Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Sep
24
2015
Nestlé V Cadbury: Is This The Break That KitKat Needs? Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
14
2020
Netac Wins Patent Infringement Case Against Micron for USB Drives Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
16
2015
Netapp Inc. v. Crossroads Systems, Inc., Denying Institution Of Second Petition By Same Petitioner Against Same Patent IPR2015-00776 Faegre Drinker
Nov
11
2015
NetApp v. Crossroads Systems: Denying Institution Under § 325(d) IPR2015-00772 Faegre Drinker
Dec
1
2022
NetEase Wins 50 Million RMB & Injunction on Appeal in Minecraft Infringement Litigation at the Guangdong Higher People’s Court Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
26
2022
Netflix Sues Bridgerton Musical Creators for Copyright and Trademark Infringement Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Dec
16
2015
Netflix v. Copy Protection: Order Regarding Withdrawal and Substitution of Counsel IPR2015-00921 Faegre Drinker
Jul
7
2014
Netflix, Inc. v. OpenTV, Inc., Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00274 Faegre Drinker
Jul
22
2014
Netflix, Inc. v. OpenTV, Inc., Denying Request for Rehearing for Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00252 Faegre Drinker
Jul
18
2014
Netflix, Inc. v. OpenTV, Inc., Denying Request for Rehearing on Decision on Institution Faegre Drinker
Aug
20
2014
Netflix, Inc. v. OpenTV, Inc.: Decision on Rehearing of Institution IPR2014-00274 Faegre Drinker
Jul
29
2015
Netflix, Inc. v. Rovi Corporation (NDCA 2015): Five TV Guide Patents Dropped by Abstract Idea Ineligibility Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
13
2015
Netsirv and Local Motion v. Boxbee: Granted Institution Of Patent Eligibility Ground But Insufficient Evidence Of Public Use PGR2015-00009 Faegre Drinker
Aug
7
2016
Netsirv et al v. Boxbee Inc.: Another patent found invalid in Post Grant Review Armstrong Teasdale
Dec
29
2009
Network Interference: A Legal Guide to the Commercial Risks and Rewards of the Social Media Phenomenon Reed Smith LLP
Sep
9
2014
Neulion, Inc. v. Filippo Costanzo, Saverio Roncolini, and Antonio Rossi: Decision Denying Institution IPR Faegre Drinker
Jul
22
2016
Nevada Supreme Court Refuses To “Blue Pencil” Unreasonable Non-Compete Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Jul
25
2016
Nevada’s High Court Won’t Get Out Its Pencil To Save Overbroad Noncompete Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Apr
25
2013
Never Bring a Knife to a Gun Fight: One Simple Weapon to Fight Economic Espionage in a Cyberspace World Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Nov
4
2015
Never Fear, Google Drone Is Here IMS Legal Strategies
May
29
2018
Never-Ending Liability Under Novartis Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Mar
23
2015
New ".SUCKS" TLD Creates Dilemma for Trademark Owners Foley & Lardner LLP
May
29
2012
New "Stuxnet"- type Virus Discovered. What are the Security Implications for You? Barnes & Thornburg LLP
May
6
2016
New (and Improved?) PTO Guidelines on Biotech Patent-Eligibility Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
19
2023
New Accelerated Patent Grant (APG) Program Enhances Opportunities for U.S. Entities K&L Gates
Apr
7
2019
New Advertising Guidance Introduced to Protect Under 18s Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Dec
30
2020
New AIA Rules Implement Hunting Titan and Preserve a Dual Role for the PTAB Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Dec
10
2020
New AIA Rules Level the Evidentiary Playing Field Pre-Institution Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jul
3
2015
New Amendments to USPTO Post-Grant Regulations McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
5
2017
New Antitrust Leader at U.S. Department of Justice Signals Return to Sound Antitrust Principles for Standard Essential Patents McKool Smith
Nov
6
2019
New Arguments In IPR Reply Are Out Of The Frying Pan, Into The Fryer McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
28
2018
New Arguments May Be Struck from Reply, but Expanded Arguments Are Not New McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
14
2019
New Artificial Intelligence Advisory Body in England and Wales – Bringing the Modern World to the Judiciary Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Feb
24
2021
New Balance Fails to Invalidate Chinese New Balance Trademark at Beijing Higher People’s Court Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
6
2014
New Balance Goes Toe-to-Toe with Karl Lagerfeld Proskauer Rose LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins