Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Mar
2
2023
China Again Top Originator of International Patent Cooperation Treaty Applications in 2022; China’s Huawei Top Filer in 2022 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
28
2018
Finjan, Inc. v ESET, LLC: Can Billing Records Evidence Intent Element of Inequitable Conduct? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
24
2023
Copyright Registrations Up 1.42% in China YoY for 2022; Software Copyright Registrations Down 19.5% Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
3
2013
Deposit of Biological Material – Impact on Validity of Priority Claim Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
13
2018
Ex parte Ho – Burden Shifting in s.101 Rejections Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
27
2023
China’s Supreme People’s Court Releases Summaries of 43 Legal Application Issues from 2022 Intellectual Property Cases Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
3
2015
Ariosa v. Sequenom – Cert. Denied Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
23
2013
Marks & Clerk Releases Life Sciences 2013 Report Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
9
2018
Kumar v. Iancu – The Dangers of an Overstuffed Preamble/Note on 37 CFR Part 4. Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
2
2023
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration to Cease Accepting Trademark Applications from Agencies that Failed to Reregister Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
6
2013
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Publishes Trial Transcript from First Covered Business Method Patent Review Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
14
2023
2022 Annual Report of the China National Intellectual Property Administration: 955,000 Patent Applications Were ‘Abnormal’ Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
19
2013
Versata: The Double Secret “Technical Effect” Standard Strikes Again Re: Patent Litigation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
6
2023
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Releases Typical Cases of Abnormal Patent Applications Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
9
2013
New Zealand Takes a Traditional Approach to Software Patents Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
27
2013
100+ Innovative American Businesses and Organizations Send Letter to Congress Opposing Expansion of America Invents Act’s “Covered Business Method Patent” Program Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
18
2019
Cutting Through the Patent Thicket – The Little Bill that Couldn’t Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
2
2013
The Unacknowledged Role of Section 112 in the Myriad Decisions Re: Patent Eligibility of Genomic DNA Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
23
2023
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration to Allow Third-Party Challenges to Pharmaceutical Patent Term Extensions Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
29
2024
Is the Patent Eligibility Act a Panacea for Claims to Diagnostics? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
3
2019
INO v. Praxair – Method-by-Selection Claims Fail Mayo/Alice Test Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
11
2020
Jaguar Land Rover Successfully Invalidates Chinese Design Patent for Landwind X7 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
26
2020
Shanghai People’s Procuratorate Launches Criminal Prosecution of Lego Block Infringers Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
12
2014
PTO (Patent and Trademark Office) section 101 Forum – Thumbs Down on Practitioners Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
5
2016
Rapid Litigation v. CellzDirect – A Break in the Section 101 Wall Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
12
2020
Chinese Intellectual Property Agency Punished for Malicious Epidemic-Related Trademark Filings Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
22
2020
Patents Required to List on the Shanghai Stock Exchange’s Science & Technology Board Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
9
2020
BASF Corp. v SNF Holding Co: Section 102 Dissected Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
15
2020
Domestic Chinese Patent Filings Surge as Coronavirus Lockdowns End in March 2020 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
17
2020
31 Million RMB Fine Shows Dual Enforcement Mechanisms for Chinese Trademark Infringement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
12
2020
Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court OKs Parallel Imports Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
28
2020
Who Are the Top Grantees of Chinese Invention Patents in 2019? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
27
2016
Patent Infringement: Method Requiring Physical Action Not Claiming Abstract Idea Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
4
2016
Patent Office Releases Comments on Standards for Patent Eligibility Examination Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
23
2020
Under Armour Defeats Uncle Martian at China’s Supreme People’s Court in Trademark Battle Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins