Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Jul
3
2020
Fifth Episode of Patent Analytics Webinar Series Discusses FTO Mapping [VIDEO] Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
26
2020
Beijing Intellectual Property Court Affirms Invalidation of Van Cleef & Arpels’ Chinese 3D Jewelry Trademark Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
11
2020
AAM v. Neapco – Part III – The Dissent Faces a “Perfect Storm” of Conflated Doctrines Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
14
2020
China’s Patent Filings Flat in July 2020 After Earlier Upsurge Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
31
2020
Fed. Cir. Panel Holds that Judge Dyk Erred in Construction of Antibody Claims Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
14
2020
China’s Threshold for Criminal Trade Secret Misappropriation to Drop to 300,000 RMB Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
20
2017
Transubstantiation of a Machine into an Abstract Idea Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
4
2014
Planet Bingo, LLC v. VKGS LLC: Bingo Invention Fails Abstract Idea Test Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
19
2020
Top 5 Changes in China’s Newly Amended Patent Law Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
30
2020
China’s Supreme People’s Court Releases Draft Patent Linkage Litigation Regulations Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
12
2020
China’s National People’s Congress Passes Amendments to Copyright Law Increasing Damages Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
18
2020
Chinese Patent Filings Down 14% in October 2020 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
15
2021
Episode 02: Data Monetization in Medical Devices, Healthcare and Insurance [WEBINAR] Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
21
2021
Shell Awarded 5.5 Million RMB in Chinese Trademark Infringement Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
24
2014
Section 101 at AIPLA - American Intellectual Property Law Association Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
27
2021
Heavier Criminal Penalties for Chinese Intellectual Property Infringement Kick in March 1, 2021 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
4
2021
China’s State Administration for Market Regulation Releases 2021 Legislative Work Plan Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
19
2017
Just When You Thought Things Couldn’t Get Worse Via Application Of 101 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
16
2021
Guest Post: Well-Known Mark Recognitions in China – Part III Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
13
2021
Chinese Invention Patent Grants Up 63% in May 2021 YoY Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
24
2017
PTAB on the Right Track in Ex parte MARK L. MORSCH, et. al. Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
12
2015
Financial Product Search System Found Patent Ineligible Under Section 101 by Delaware Court Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
17
2021
China’s Supreme People’s Court: Declaratory Judgement Actions Involving Invalidated Patents are Possible Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
3
2021
Chinese Patent Bar Applicants Hits New High in 2021 – Over 50,000 People Applied to Take the Exam Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
13
2021
How Fast is the Patent Prosecution Highway in China? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
30
2021
Chinese Patent Office Announces Record 1.04 Million RMB Fine for Unauthorized Practice of Patent Law Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
16
2015
Genetic Engineering Makes the Blacklist Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
11
2022
Shanghai’s No. 3 Intermediate Court Sentences DuPont Counterfeiter to 2+ Years in Prison Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
9
2011
Supreme Court decides Stanford v. Roche – Clarifies Scope of Bayh-Dole Act Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
30
2011
Divided Panel Finds DNA Molecules Patentable – Cancer Screening Claims Too Abstract Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
5
2017
Sea Change in IPR or Just an SOS? – Aqua Products, Inc. v. Matal Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
12
2015
Ariosa v. Sequenom – Novel Genetic Analysis Fails The Mayo Test Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
15
2022
Beijing Intellectual Property Court Announces China’s First Patent Linkage Judgment Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
10
2022
China’s Patent Office Releases Top 10 Patent Reexamination Invalidation Cases of 2021 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
19
2012
AMP Petitions for Cert. and A Look Back Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins