Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Aug
2
2019
USPTO Proposes Fee Increases Across the Board Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
16
2024
Chinese Utility Model Grants Down 25.5% in 2023, Invention Patent Grants Up 15.4% in Shift from Quantity to Quality Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
21
2019
PTO Releases New Guidelines on Subject Matter Eligibility Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
21
2014
Federal Circuit Reaffirms Cybor Standard in Lightning Ballast Rehearing Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
21
2019
Nuvo Pharms. v. Dr. Reddy’s Labs. – Catch 22 at the Federal Circuit? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
10
2019
Solicitor General Signals Supreme Court to Address the Confusion Caused by the Abstract Idea Exception to 101 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
17
2014
Broad Alliance of High Tech Start-Ups and Growing Concerns Urges Supreme Court to Preserve Critical Patent Protection for Innovative Software Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
13
2024
China’s State Administration for Market Regulation Releases Interim Provisions on Anti-Unfair Competition on the Internet Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
14
2016
Supreme Court’s Stryker/Halo Decision Makes it Easier for Courts to Award Enhanced Damages In Patent Infringement Cases Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
25
2020
Chinese Patent Filings Show Uptick in January 2020 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
12
2016
USPTO Post-Prosecution Pilot Program Launches Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
2
2020
New Edition of C.I.P.A. Guide to Patent Acts Published Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
16
2020
New Balance Scores Chinese Unfair Competition Victory Against New Barlun Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
16
2016
McRO v. Namco – Fed. Cir. Reverses s. 101 Invalidation of Animation Method Patents Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
14
2014
Todd Dickinson Resigns as Executive Director of AIPLA - American Intellectual Property Law Association Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
26
2020
China’s Ministry of Justice Releases Draft Guiding Opinions on Strengthening the Protection of Commercial Secrets in Administrative Licensing Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
15
2014
Recent Grants in Electronic Commerce Technology Group Provide Evidence that At Least “Technical Inventions” Still Pass Muster Under Alice Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
30
2014
U.S. Bancorp CBM Results in Cancellation of Retirement Capital Access Management Co.’s Patent Claims Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
28
2017
PTAB Dismisses Three IPR Petitions Based on Sovereign Immunity Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
5
2020
China Announces Completion of Their Third Generation Nuclear Reactor Backed by Over a Thousand Patents Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
4
2020
NavInfo Awarded 10 Million RMB in China Copyright Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
30
2020
Shanghai Higher People’s Court Upholds 6-Year Prison Term and 90 Million RMB Fine for Lego Chinese Copyright Infringer Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
5
2021
Amazon Hit With 76 Million RMB Verdict for Chinese Trademark Infringement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
18
2021
Illumina v. Ariosa – Ariosa Petitions for Cert. Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
25
2021
Biden was Inaugurated on January 20, 2021, His Name is Already Trademarked in China Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
12
2021
Advice: Delay Filing Chinese Design Patents Until June 1, 2021 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
23
2021
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Announces Continuation of the ‘Blue Sky’ Intellectual Property Industry Rectification Program Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
1
2021
TikTok Maker Sued for 2.274 billion RMB for Copyright Infringement and Trade Secret Misappropriation in China Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
8
2015
California District Court Refuses to Invalidate Gaming Patent as Encompassing an Abstract Idea Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
11
2017
Athena Diagnostics v. Mayo – Finessing the Correlations Trap? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
14
2021
Yu v. Apple – Transubstantiation of a Camera into an Abstract Idea Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
21
2015
Claim Construction in Patents: Teva v. Sandoz: “Just the facts, Ma’am” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
10
2021
Tackling Bad Faith Trademark Applications or Registrations in China Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
6
2015
In re Cuozzo Speed Technologies: Federal Circuit Affirms Board Finding of Unpatentability in First IPR Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
21
2021
USPTO Sanctions U.S. Patent Attorney for Renting out Bar Registration to Chinese Trademark Agency to File Trademark Applications Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins