Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Mar
21
2019
PanOptis’ Recent Victory against Huawei Demonstrates Why an International Enforcement Approach Is Advisable for Standard-Essential Patents Mintz
Dec
22
2015
Par Pharmaceutical v. Horizon Therapeutics: Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2015-01117 Faegre Drinker
Aug
12
2015
Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. and Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Parent Company Is Not Necessarily Real Party-In-Interest IPR2015-00546 Faegre Drinker
Jan
26
2015
Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Roxane Laboratories, Inc., and Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Denying Institution of Covered Business Method Review Faegre Drinker
Mar
3
2022
Paradise Lost: Art Created by AI Is Ineligible for Copyright Protection McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
4
2013
Paradise Troubled by Alleged Unfair Competition involving "Certified Social Media Strategist" Mark Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
May
25
2018
Parallel Important Law is Set to Change - Bill introduced to Parliament that will pave the way for parallel importers in Australia. K&L Gates
Jan
6
2015
Paramount Home Entertainment Inc., Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment LLC, and Universal Studios Home Entertainment LLC v. Nissim Corporation, IPR2014-00961: Denying Institution IPR2014-00961 Faegre Drinker
Apr
1
2015
Paramount, Twentieth Century Fox, and Universal Studios v. Nissim Corp: Denying Request for Rehearing IPR2014-00961, 00962 Faegre Drinker
Apr
8
2021
Pardon My French: France Wins Trademark Dispute Using Sovereign Immunity McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
29
2016
Parent Company Furnishes Cancellation of Subsidiary’s Trademark Registration Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
17
2021
Paris Court of Appeals Rejects Pharmaceutical Supplementary Protection Certificate Applications McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
1
2016
Parks’ Allegations Against “Finest” Franks Not In the “Ball Park” of False Advertising Claims Proskauer Rose LLP
Dec
14
2023
Parody of Iconic Sneaker Isn’t Entitled to Heightened First Amendment Protection McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
24
2015
PARROT S.A. and PARROT, INC. v. DRONE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Claims Not Found Unpatentable Where Cited Art Was Not Shown To Be Analogous IPR2014-00732 Faegre Drinker
Sep
1
2015
Parsing USPTO Petitions Data Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
2
2018
Part 15 of “The Restricting Covenant” Series: Non-Competes, Trade Secrets and Corporate Espionage Faegre Drinker
May
10
2021
Part 1: Prosecution History in Claim Interpretation Finnegan
Jan
19
2016
Part 2 – Foreign Filing Restrictions and Licenses in China Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
May
17
2021
Part 2: Prosecution History Under the Doctrine of Equivalents Finnegan
Jan
29
2016
Part 3 – Foreign Filing Restrictions and Licenses in India Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Sep
8
2021
Part II: The Current State of Precedential Opinions and Denials of Institution at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board – Advanced Bionics and Section 325(d) Discretionary Denials Finnegan
Mar
31
2023
Part II: When You Jump Chains, Do NFTs Stay the Same? Ordinals on the Bitcoin Blockchain Proskauer Rose LLP
Apr
26
2019
Partial Institutions not Null and Void if Modified After Institution Deadline McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
25
2020
Participation of Women Inventors in the US Patent System Is Increasing Slowly but Surely Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
24
2021
Particularity in Petitions Produces Positive Post-Grant Review Proceedings Finnegan
Jul
29
2021
Parties May Offer Differing Claim Constructions Before the PTAB and District Court Without Invoking Judicial Estoppel, District Court Finds Finnegan
Jan
26
2018
Parties Must Arbitrate Arbitrability McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
14
2013
Parties Terminate Covered Business Method (CBM) Before They Settle Dispute to Avoid Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decision Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
3
2011
Parties’ Contract Trumps Patent Act to Deny Prejudgment Interest McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
14
2021
Party May Not Veil EU Individual’s Information under GDPR at the TTAB McDermott Will & Emery
May
28
2015
Party Over for Claimed Mardi Gras Bead Dog Trademarks re: Trademark Validity McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
29
2016
Party Raising “First Sale” Defense to Copyright Infringement Bears Initial Burden of Proof McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
12
2012
Party Seeking Preliminary Injunction Must Demonstrate a Nexus Between the Patented Feature and the Consumers’ Decision to Purchase Its Product McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
26
2015
Party’s Products Must Be Found in the Forum State to Confer Jurisdiction: Celgard, LLC v. SK Innovation Co., Ltd. McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins