Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Dec
11
2015
"It Ain't Over Till It's Over" – Photographers Obtain Preliminary Injunction to Halt Infringing Sales of Memorabilia Proskauer Rose LLP
Dec
11
2015
Square v. Unwired Planet: Final Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-01165 Faegre Drinker
Dec
11
2015
Florida Federal Court Rules that Apotex Must Give Amgen Notice Upon Biosimilar Licensure Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
11
2015
Exhale…Ninth Circuit Rules Sequence of Yoga Poses Not Copyrightable Proskauer Rose LLP
Dec
11
2015
Bungie v. Worlds: Decision Instituting Inter Partes Review of All Challenged Claims IPR2015-01319 Faegre Drinker
Dec
11
2015
Running Shoe Companies Accused of Infringing Sports Apparel Patent Proskauer Rose LLP
Dec
11
2015
Keep Off (Patented) Grass Proskauer Rose LLP
Dec
11
2015
Role of Previously Considered Prior Art in Deciding to Institute Inter Partes Review Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
11
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 11, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
10
2015
Patents: Tips for Responding to New Grounds of Rejection in Examiner’s Answer Mintz
Dec
10
2015
Legacy Separators v. Halliburton Energy Services: Decision Denying Institution IPR2015-01526 Faegre Drinker
Dec
10
2015
When Prior Terminal Disclaimers Continue to Punish Subsequent Applications: Potential Danger in Filing Overly-Broad Terminal Disclaimer Mintz
Dec
10
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 10, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
10
2015
Interference Statute Does Not Require Diligence For Re-Presenting Claims Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
10
2015
Biologics and Biosimilars Bits and Bytes – December 10, 2015 Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
9
2015
North America Seoul Semiconductor v. Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha and Enplas Corp: Final Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-00879 Faegre Drinker
Dec
9
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 9, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
8
2015
Proposed Rule Changes For IPR Appeals Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
8
2015
Whatever Happened To That Federal Trade Secrets Law? Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Dec
8
2015
eBay v. Locata LBS: Final Written Decision Finding Evidence of Commercial Success Unpersuasive IPR2014-00585 Faegre Drinker
Dec
8
2015
Zhejiang Yankon Group v. Cordelia Lighting: Denying Institution for Failing to Name All Real Parties-in-Interest IPR2015-01420 Faegre Drinker
Dec
8
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 8, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
8
2015
Masterimage 3d et al. v. Reald: Denying Request to File Motion to Expunge Where Issue Could be Addressed in Sur-Reply IPR2015-00035 Faegre Drinker
Dec
8
2015
ETS-Lindgren v. Microwave Vision: Denying Institution for Lack of Identification of Corresponding Structure Faegre Drinker
Dec
8
2015
Judge Lourie (Federal Circuit) Suggests Jepson Claims For Patent Eligibility Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
7
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 7, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
6
2015
European Commission Publishes its 6th Report on the Monitoring of Patent Settlements Covington & Burling LLP
Dec
5
2015
CaptionCall, LLC v. Ultratec, Inc - Decision Denying Request For Rehearing IPR2013-00541 Faegre Drinker
Dec
4
2015
Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd and North America Seoul Semiconductor, Inc. v. Enplas Corporation: Final Written Decision Faegre Drinker
Dec
4
2015
RPX Corporation v. Applications in Internet Time: Additional Discovery into RPI Granted Where Evidence Showed Petitioner May Act as Agent or Proxy for Third Parties IPR2015-01750,01752 Faegre Drinker
Dec
4
2015
Straight Path IP Group v. Sipnet EU S.R.O.: Federal Circuit Reverses Board’s Claim Construction Based on Plain Meaning of Claim Language Faegre Drinker
Dec
4
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 4, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
4
2015
Ariosa v. Sequenom: In Search of Yes After a Decade of No Texas A&M University School of Law
Dec
3
2015
Federal Circuit Deems IPR Constitutional: Patent Office Can Correct Its Own Mistakes Mintz
Dec
3
2015
Chicago Mercantile Exchange v. 5th Market: Decision Granting Motion To Apply For A Subpoena CBM2015-00061 Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins