Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text	Title	Organization
Dec 6 2015	European Commission Publishes its 6th Report on the Monitoring of Patent Settlements	Covington & Burling LLP
Dec 5 2015	CaptionCall, LLC v. Ultratec, Inc - Decision Denying Request For Rehearing IPR2013-00541	Faegre Drinker
Dec 4 2015	Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd and North America Seoul Semiconductor, Inc. v. Enplas Corporation: Final Written Decision	Faegre Drinker
Dec 4 2015	RPX Corporation v. Applications in Internet Time: Additional Discovery into RPI Granted Where Evidence Showed Petitioner May Act as Agent or Proxy for Third Parties IPR2015-01750,01752	Faegre Drinker
Dec 4 2015	Straight Path IP Group v. Sipnet EU S.R.O.: Federal Circuit Reverses Board’s Claim Construction Based on Plain Meaning of Claim Language	Faegre Drinker
Dec 4 2015	PTO Litigation Center Report – December 4, 2015	Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec 4 2015	Ariosa v. Sequenom: In Search of Yes After a Decade of No	Texas A&M University School of Law
Dec 3 2015	Federal Circuit Deems IPR Constitutional: Patent Office Can Correct Its Own Mistakes	Mintz
Dec 3 2015	Chicago Mercantile Exchange v. 5th Market: Decision Granting Motion To Apply For A Subpoena CBM2015-00061	Faegre Drinker
Dec 3 2015	Ariosa v. Sequenom – Cert. Denied	Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec 3 2015	Vitro Packaging v. Saverglass: Denying Institution Of Design Patent Based On Distinctive Visual Appearance Of Claimed Design Over Prior Art IPR2015-00947	Faegre Drinker
Dec 3 2015	FDA Finalizes Guidance For Formal Meetings Between FDA and Biosimilars Applicants	Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec 3 2015	Eastman Kodak, Agfa Corp, Esko Software Bvba, and Heidleberg, USA v. CTP Innovations - Final Written Decision Confirming All Challenged Claims IPR2014-00788	Faegre Drinker
Dec 3 2015	Judge Dyk Would Add Reduction To Practice To Patent Eligibility Requirement	Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec 3 2015	Federal Circuit Confirms Constitutionality of IPR Proceedings in MCM Portfolio v. Hewlett-Packard	Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec 3 2015	December 2015 Update - gTLD Sunrise Periods Now Open	Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec 2 2015	Missed Connections: Seeking The Girl on the Train, Found Girl on a Train - Authorship Protection	Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec 2 2015	PTO Litigation Center Report – December 2, 2015	Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec 2 2015	Proper Claim Construction Requires Context - Atlas IP, LLC v. Medtronic, Inc.	McDermott Will & Emery
Dec 2 2015	Federal Circuit Denies Rehearing In Sequenom	Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec 2 2015	Plaintiff with Injured Reputation May Have Standing in Inventorship Correction Case	McDermott Will & Emery
Dec 2 2015	A Substantially Pure Isomer Is Obvious When the Completely Pure Isomer Is Known In The Art: Spectrum Pharms., Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.	McDermott Will & Emery
Dec 2 2015	Patent Applicant Must Provide Clear Evidence to Antedate a Prior Art Reference In re: Steed et al.	McDermott Will & Emery
Dec 1 2015	US Postal Service and USA, as represented by Postmaster General v. Return Mail: Final Written Decision Finding Standing Based on Eminent Domain Lawsuit CBM2014-00116	Faegre Drinker
Dec 1 2015	Settlement Agreement Precludes Consideration of Order Criticizing Attorney Conduct	McDermott Will & Emery
Dec 1 2015	The Medicines Company v. Hospira, Inc.: Federal Circuit to Consider On-Sale Bar En Banc	McDermott Will & Emery
Dec 1 2015	American Express Company v. Signature Systems, LLC: PTAB Decisions on Instituting CBM Review Are Based Only on the Petition and Preliminary Response	McDermott Will & Emery
Dec 1 2015	Disclaimed Claims May Be Considered When Determining Eligibility for CBM Review	McDermott Will & Emery
Dec 1 2015	Inter Partes Review – 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) One Year Bar and Exceptions	Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec 1 2015	PTAB Denies Institution Where Claim Indefiniteness Precludes Application of Prior Art to the Claims	McDermott Will & Emery
Dec 1 2015	PTO Litigation Center Report – December 1, 2015	Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec 1 2015	Citing PTO’s Intervenor Brief, PTAB Grants Rehearing and Clarifies Scope of Joinder	McDermott Will & Emery
Dec 1 2015	PTAB Finds Claims to Be Directed to Covered Business Method, but Denies Institution Anyway	McDermott Will & Emery
Dec 1 2015	Non-Litigant, You Are Not Needed in This IPR	McDermott Will & Emery
Nov 30 2015	Patent Trial and Appeal Board: No Rubber Stamp on Motions to Seal	McDermott Will & Emery

Subscribe to Intellectual Property

Trending News

Intellectual Property

Legal Disclaimer