Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
May
29
2015
Info-Hold Cases: De Novo Review Where Claim Construction Evidence Is Neither Intrinsic Nor Extrinsic and Expert Damages Testimony Unnecessary for Damages McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2015
No Competitive Injury Without Intent and Action to Enter the Market re: False Marking Statute McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2015
Quantify Versus Quality Determines Domestic Industry: Lelo Inc. v. International Trade Commission McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2015
Biodelivery Sciences International v. Monosol RX: Denying Institution Because of Insufficient Explanation of Why POSITA Would Have Found the Invention Obvious IPR2015-00167 Faegre Drinker
May
29
2015
Divided Commission Upholds ALJ’s Default Sanction and Attorney Fee Award Against Respondent and its Law Firm McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2015
An Abstract Idea by Any Other Name - Epicor Software Corp. v. Protegrity Corp., Google Inc. v. Unwired Planet, LLC McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2015
ID on Infringement and Public Interest in Remand of InterDigital Investigation McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2015
A Sucking Sound on Domain Names: .SUCKS is Open for Registration Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
29
2015
Federal Circuit Vacates Panel Decision on Disparaging Trademark and Orders En Banc Hearing McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2015
Technological Invention Exception Key to Foiling CBM McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2015
Ericsson v. Intellectual Ventures I: Publication Date on an IEEE Publication Found to Meet Exception to Hearsay Rule in Final Written Decision for IPR2014-00527 Faegre Drinker
May
28
2015
Good Faith Belief in Invalidity No Defense to Active Inducement McDermott Will & Emery
May
28
2015
What Are the Basics of the Patent Process? P.1 McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie and Kirkland, PLLC
May
28
2015
Hyundai Mobis and Mobis Alabama v. Autoliv ASP: Granting Motion for Additional Discovery IPR2014-01005 Faegre Drinker
May
28
2015
Litigants Challenging PTO Decisions in District Court Should Be Prepared to Pay PTO’s Attorneys’ Fees McDermott Will & Emery
May
28
2015
Pre-Arbitration Injunction May Only Preserve Status Quo re: Breach of a Trademark License Agreement McDermott Will & Emery
May
28
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – May 28, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
28
2015
Presumption of Validity Triumphs over a Good-Faith Belief of Invalidity Hunton Andrews Kurth
May
28
2015
NOPALEA Mark Merely Descriptive of a Product Derived from Nopalea Cactus McDermott Will & Emery
May
28
2015
Preemption of State-Law Tort Claims by the Copyright Act McDermott Will & Emery
May
28
2015
PTAB Issues ‘Quick Fix’ Rule Package, Effective Immediately Mintz
May
28
2015
Attorney’s Fees Awarded in “Nonsensical” Trade Secrets Case McDermott Will & Emery
May
28
2015
Induced Infringement in Commil USA v. Cisco Systems Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
28
2015
Party Over for Claimed Mardi Gras Bead Dog Trademarks re: Trademark Validity McDermott Will & Emery
May
28
2015
Wood Laminate Flooring Design “Not a Slavish Copy of Nature” McDermott Will & Emery
May
28
2015
Edmund Optics, Inc. v. Semrock, Inc.: Denying Motion for Live Testimony at Oral Argument IPR2014-00599 Faegre Drinker
May
27
2015
Supreme Court Rules that a Good-Faith Belief of Invalidity is Not a Defense to Indirect Infringement Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
May
27
2015
High Court Rules That Good Faith Belief Of Invalidity Is Not Defense To Induced Infringement Barnes & Thornburg LLP
May
27
2015
Supreme Court Removes Good Faith Belief of Patent Invalidity as Defense to Induced Patent Infringement Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
May
27
2015
Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.: A Good-Faith Belief of Patent Invalidity is Not a Defense to Induced Infringement Armstrong Teasdale
May
27
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – May 27, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
27
2015
Supreme Court Holds Good Faith Belief of Invalidity Not a Defense to Induced Infringement Claim Foley & Lardner LLP
May
27
2015
U.S. Supreme Court Further Clarifies Indirect Infringement Standards Proskauer Rose LLP
May
27
2015
Dependent Claims Give Rise To Improper Broadening Reissue re: Patent Applications Foley & Lardner LLP
May
27
2015
USPTO Amends Rules of Practice Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board Armstrong Teasdale
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins