Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Apr
30
2015
Why the Grace Period Restoration Act Is a Bad Idea Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
30
2015
PTAB: We Are Disinclined to Acquiesce to Your Rehearing Request McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
30
2015
Nearly Expired Is Not the Same as Expired: The Board Clarifies Claim Construction Standards for Inter Partes Review McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
30
2015
Facts Govern Real Party-in-Interest Determinations McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
30
2015
FDA Finalizes Key Guidance Documents on Biosimilars Mintz
Apr
30
2015
Cleaning Up a Trademark Damage Mess McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
30
2015
Standard Innovation v. Lelo: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00148 Faegre Drinker
Apr
30
2015
Offering of Services Alone Insufficient Basis for § 1(a) Trademark Application: David Couture v. Playdom McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
30
2015
Galderma and Q-Med AB v. Allergan: Decision on Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-01417 Faegre Drinker
Apr
30
2015
Hague Contracting Parties Design Patent Preparation and Prosecution Reference Guide Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
30
2015
I Second that e-Motion: Protecting Motion Marks Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
30
2015
Bank of America and PNC Bank v. Intellectual Ventures: Final Written Decision CBM2014-00030 Faegre Drinker
Apr
29
2015
Baxter Healthcare Corp., Apatech, Inc., and Apatech Limited v. Millenium Biologix, LLC, Final Written Decision IPR2013-00582 Faegre Drinker
Apr
29
2015
CaptionCall v. Ultratec: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00540 Faegre Drinker
Apr
29
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 29, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
29
2015
Data Breaches: Every Company Is at Risk - Part 1 – Cynthia Larose, Chair, Privacy & Security Practice Mintz
Apr
29
2015
The High Price of Challenging a Refusal to Register a Trademark in District Court Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Apr
28
2015
Apple Twitter and Yelp v. Evolutionary Intelligence: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00086 Faegre Drinker
Apr
28
2015
IT Contracts – Julie Korostoff, Co-chair, IT Transactions & Outsourcing Practice [VIDEO] Mintz
Apr
28
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 28, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
28
2015
General Electric v. Transdata: Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-01505 Faegre Drinker
Apr
28
2015
“Isolated” Natural Products Still in Purgatory Post-PTO Guidance? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
28
2015
Toyota Motor v. Leroy G. Hagenbuch: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00123 Faegre Drinker
Apr
28
2015
Approval of First Biosimilar Monoclonal Antibody in Brazil Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Apr
28
2015
EBay v. Moneycat: Granting Extension of Time to Submit Supplemental Evidence CBM2014-00091-93 Faegre Drinker
Apr
28
2015
Pre-Grant Submissions and Post-Grant Review Proceedings in Brazil – Part 6 of an 8 Part Series Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Apr
27
2015
Medtronic, Inc. v. NuVasive, Inc. Final Written Decision IPR2014-00081 Faegre Drinker
Apr
27
2015
ButamaxTM Advanced Biofuels LLC v. Gevo, Inc., Final Written Decision IPR2013-00539 Faegre Drinker
Apr
26
2015
Second Circuit to Weigh In on Copyright Owner-Digital Broadcaster Dispute Over Pre-1972 Sound Recording Performance Rights Proskauer Rose LLP
Apr
25
2015
Medtronic Vascular v. Lifeport Sciences: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00288 Faegre Drinker
Apr
24
2015
Fujitsu Semiconductor v. Zond: Decision Granting Petitioner Page Extension IPR2014-00781 Faegre Drinker
Apr
24
2015
Aruze Gaming Macau v. MGT Gaming: Decision on Institution IPR2014-01288 Faegre Drinker
Apr
24
2015
Kaspersky v. Uniloc: Denying Institution IPR2015-00178 Faegre Drinker
Apr
24
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 24, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
24
2015
Win or Lose, Trademark Applicants Must Pay PTO Attorney Fees in Appeals to District Court, Fourth Circuit Says Foley & Lardner LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins