Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
May
5
2020
IP Protection and the Open COVID Cure Chase Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
24
2014
Trending Information: The Connection Between Data Brokers and the Fashion Industry Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
11
2020
Easier Copyright Registration Coming for Blogs and Social Media Posts Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
22
2020
Clash of Game Companies: Lessons learned from GREE and Supercell Dispute Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
29
2020
USPTO Issues Guidance on Examination of Generic.com Terms Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
29
2021
The DTSA as a Tool for Foreign Entities’ Enforcement of Trade Secrets: A New Legal Frontier Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
4
2021
Practice What You Preach: Trade Secret Rules (Of Course) Apply to Lawyers Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
10
2021
Waiver Of Intellectual Property Protections For COVID-19 Vaccine Unlikely To Have Meaningful Impact In Short Term Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
30
2021
Patent Protection on AI Inventions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
15
2021
Ninth Circuit Denies Sherman Act Challenge To No-Poach Provision Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
8
2009
Does Edwards v. Arthur Anderson Bar The Use of Employee Confidentiality Agreements? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
26
2010
It's Not Over For MGA's Bratz Doll Line Yet Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
30
2015
B&B Hardware v. Hargis – U.S. Supreme Court Declares TTAB Findings Can Have Preclusive Effect on Subsequent Federal Court Decisions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
2
2011
China Revamps Its Outdated Copyright Pledges System Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
25
2011
Indirect Purchaser Plavix Class Actions Tossed for Lack of Antitrust Standing Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
3
2022
Healthcare Res. Mgmt. Grp., LLC v. Econatura All Healthy World, LLC – A Cautionary Tale: Meticulous or Careless Strategy Required to Prove Your Trade Secret Claim Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
2
2022
Money Laundering and High-Value Art: Treasury’s Study Discusses Financial Crimes and NFTs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
14
2022
Tokenization and the Law: Legal Issues with NFTs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
9
2012
The Year In Review Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
12
2023
Another Federal Agency Issues Request for Comments on AI Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
19
2013
Massachusetts District Court Finds No Inference of Conspiracy Arising From Members of Standard Setting Organization Pursuing Self Interest In Refusing To Approve Plaintiff's Competing Technology Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
3
2013
Supreme Court Hears Arguments on "Pay for Delay" Agreements Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
14
2018
The Hammer Falls on the First Major Blockchain-based Art Auction Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
6
2023
Ironburg Inventions Ltd. v. Valve Corp. 21-2296 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 3, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
19
2023
The After Effects of the Music Modernization Act in the Digital Streaming Sphere Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
19
2016
Copyright Is Nothing To Joke About Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
29
2023
Design Patents Milestone Announced Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
6
2023
SNIPR Tech. Ltd. v. Rockefeller Univ., No. 22-1260 (Fed. Cir. July 14, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
24
2023
Sisvel International S.A. v. Sierra Wireless, Inc., No. 2022-1387, 2022-1492 (Fed. Cir. Sept 1, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
15
2013
United States Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Two Cases That Could Potentially Deter Non-Practicing Entities From Filing Frivolous Suits Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
15
2016
Federal Circuit Won’t Review USPTO’s Alice Guidelines Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
13
2023
Federal Circuit Evaluates Impact of the Final Written Decision (FWD) in a Parallel Inter-Partes Review (IPR) on District Court’s decision of Invalidity and Infringement Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
21
2023
PTAB’s Authority to Issue a Final Written Decision After a Statutory Deadline Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
14
2024
AI-Assisted Inventions: Are They Patentable? Who is the Inventor? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
16
2016
Artist Sued for Denying He Created Art Piece - I Swear It’s Not Mine Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins