Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
May
22
2018
Recent Blockchain Patents of Note : May 22, 2018 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
15
2013
The Architecture of Copyright Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
2
2023
In re Couvaras, No. 2022-1489 (Fed. Cir. June 14, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
18
2013
No Avoiding BPCIA (Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act) For Biosimilars: No Patent Declaratory Judgment Action Before Biosimilars Application Is Filed Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
15
2023
Petitioner Failed to Establish Standing in IPR Appeal Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
17
2019
Don’t Spill Your Trade Secrets: Protecting Your Competitive Advantage in the Food and Beverage Industry (Part 1 of 2) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
8
2014
Bitcoins and Liability in the Wake of Recent Silk Road Arrests Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
18
2024
Federal Circuit Affirms Skinny Label Carve Outs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
26
2019
“Addressing Video Game Claims Under the Phillips Standard at the PTAB” Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
7
2024
George Carlin Was Funny – Copying His Likeness AIn’t – Estate Settles AI-based Copyright Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
24
2020
Limited Relief for Patent and Trademark Applicants Affected by COVID-19 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
25
2020
Intellectual Property Outlook: Cases and Trends to Follow in 2020 — PART 4 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
2
2020
USPTO Permitting Patent Applicants to Extend Certain Deadlines Due to COVID-19 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
27
2014
USPTO Issues Preliminary Examination Instructions in Light of Alice Corp. - U.S. Patent And Trademark Office Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
10
2016
Supreme Court and the Lanham Act: Lee v Tam Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
25
2017
Suing The United States Government For Patent Infringement And Defending Against A Claim Of Obviousness Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
22
2020
Fifth Circuit Affirms Attorney’s Fee Award of $2.3 million in Misappropriation Case Against Former Employee who Failed to Comply with Court’s Objections Order Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
10
2021
Federal Circuit Agrees to Reconsider Ruling in GSK v. Teva Drug Patent Case Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
16
2021
Diminution in Value As A Measure of Damages for Trade Secret Misappropriation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
26
2015
Teva v. Sandoz (USSC) – Standard for Appellate Review of Claim Construction Rulings Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
28
2009
Brave New Web: Trademark Rights in the Expanding Internet Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
30
2021
Trade Secret vs. Patent – a False Dichotomy Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
9
2010
Adjusting the Inequitable Conduct Doctrine: Federal Circuit Hears Oral Arguments En Banc in Therasense Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
19
2021
New York State Employers to Require Transparency in Electronic Monitoring Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
29
2022
California Labor Code Section 925: A Word of Caution for Out-of-State Employers of California Employees Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
14
2022
The Legit Ledger Episode 1: Intellectual Property Considerations for Licensing NFTs with Yasamin Parsafar and Jim Gatto [PODCAST] Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
15
2023
SEC Seeks To Update Privacy Act of 1974 Regulations Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
6
2023
FDA Clarifies Approach to Pediatric Drug Development Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
27
2023
Yita LLC v. MacNeil IP LLC 2022-1373, 2022-1374 (Fed. Cir. June 6, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
8
2013
Dang v. San Francisco Forty Niners - Consumers Can Challenge Reebok's Exclusive NFL Apparel Deal Based Just on a Market of Garments Bearing NFL Team Logos Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
27
2023
HIP Inc. v. Hormel Foods Corp. No. 2022-1696, _ F.4th ___ (Fed. Cir. May 2, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
8
2019
Supreme Court Holds that a Copyright Claimant May Commence an Infringement Suit Only AFTER the Copyright Office Registers the Copyright Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
6
2023
Trinity Info Media, LLC, fka Trinity Intel Media, LLC, v. Covalent, Inc., No. 2022-1308 (Fed. Cir. July 14, 2023) (“Opinion”) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
2
2013
Kraft v. Cracker Barrel: A Summary of Judge Posner’s Opinion and an Alternative Reverse Confusion Theory of Liability Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
7
2019
Today’s Special: Validity Goulash – Serving Up 101 in the Mechanical Arts Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins