Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Oct
25
2011
Safe-Harbor Provision of Hatch-Waxman Act Does Not Protect Post-Approval Research Activities Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
28
2022
Federal Circuit Deems Algorithm Potentially Valid Trade Secret Notwithstanding Prior Publication Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
4
2022
Dairy, LLC v. Milk Moovement, Inc.: Identifying Software Trade Secrets With Particularity to State a Claim for Trade Secret Misappropriation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
23
2023
SCOTUS: “The More a Party Claims for Itself the More it Must Enable” Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
4
2023
Generative AI and Copyright – Some Recent Denials and Unanswered Questions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
3
2019
The U.S. Trademark Office Opens The Door to Registering Certain Cannabis Trademarks Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
4
2023
Computer Love: Beijing Court Finds AI-Generated Image is Copyrightable in Split with United States Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
10
2023
Will Supreme Court Consider Whether to Allow an Alternative to In-App Purchasing on the App Store? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
14
2023
Federal Circuit Vacates District Court’s Claim Construction of the Term “Pipette Guiding Mechanism” Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
23
2019
Don’t Spill Your Trade Secrets: Protecting Your Competitive Advantage in the Food and Beverage Industry (Part 2 of 2) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
22
2024
Identifying Protocols by Name May Disclose Sufficient Structure for Computer-Implemented Means-Plus-Function Limitations Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
29
2019
Italian Film Composer “Scores” for Authors Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
16
2016
Artist Sued for Denying He Created Art Piece - I Swear It’s Not Mine Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
29
2020
Recent Case Law May Open New Celebrity Dance Suits Against Game Publishers Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
6
2015
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Sides With PTAB in Inter Partes Review Appeal Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
15
2009
UMG v. Augusto: Allowing the Sale of Promotional CDs Under the First Sale Doctrine Could Affect Much More than the Music Industry Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
26
2010
The Southern District Of New York Sends A Clear Message To Retailers Selling Counterfeits That Failing To Exercise Due Diligence In Purchasing Products After An Injunction May Result In Trebled Damages Of Millions Of Dollars Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
1
2010
Sometimes "Compare To" Packaging Means Just What it Says Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
17
2015
Venture Capitalists Running Scared – HBO's Hooli Suing Pied Piper Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
3
2022
SEC Targets NFTs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
9
2012
The Year In Review Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
27
2022
One Bad Apple Won’t Spoil the Rest of the Bunch’s Ability to Fairly Compete in Matthews International Corp. v. Lombardi Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
8
2023
To Be, or Not to Be? Considerations for A.I.- Generated Art Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
19
2013
Massachusetts District Court Finds No Inference of Conspiracy Arising From Members of Standard Setting Organization Pursuing Self Interest In Refusing To Approve Plaintiff's Competing Technology Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
3
2013
Supreme Court Hears Arguments on "Pay for Delay" Agreements Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
19
2016
Copyright Is Nothing To Joke About Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
3
2019
Challenges in Filing Successful IPR Petitions for Video Game Patents Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
15
2013
United States Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Two Cases That Could Potentially Deter Non-Practicing Entities From Filing Frivolous Suits Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
15
2016
Federal Circuit Won’t Review USPTO’s Alice Guidelines Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
1
2019
Yes, UCANN! Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
10
2023
Second Circuit Finds Art Collective Can’t Use First Amendment to Skate Out of Injunction Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
16
2019
Perils of Waiting: PTAB’s Precedential Opinion Panel Designates Two More Decisions Rejecting 315(b) Arguments Regarding Time Bars Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
11
2014
French Court Supports Freedom of Authentication: A Win for Art Experts Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
23
2016
Virtual Porn – Real Patent Lawsuit Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
15
2016
Don’t Lose Your Digital Millennium Copyright Act Safe Harbor Protection! Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins