Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Dec
1
2022
NetEase Wins 50 Million RMB & Injunction on Appeal in Minecraft Infringement Litigation at the Guangdong Higher People’s Court Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
21
2011
Caraco – The Little Counterclaim That Could? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
18
2011
Judge Michel Takes “Patent Reform” Bills To Task Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
16
2023
Chinese Invention Patent Grants Up 14.7% in 2022 YoY; Utility Model Grants Down 10.1% Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
17
2023
Mattel Defeats Chinese Trademark Applicant Attempting to Register “Barbie” for Services Including Artificial Insemination (For Animals) Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
18
2011
Infringement by Unobvious Changes – A Look (Way) Back Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
22
2015
Board Limits Multiple IPR Challenges in Samsung Electronics v. Rembrandt Wireless Technologies Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
11
2023
China’s Supreme People’s Court Releases Annual Report of the Intellectual Property Court for 2022 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
2
2023
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Releases Top 10 Patent Reexamination Invalidation Cases of 2022 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
21
2012
Indian Patent Office Grants Compulsory License To Bayer Drug Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
27
2012
Handbook of Quality Procedures Before the EPO Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
8
2019
USTPO Releases Proposed Revised Section 101 Eligibility Guidelines Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
17
2012
Why Myriad Should Drop Its Appeal Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
17
2019
Is the “Blocking Patent” Doctrine Part of the Obviousness Analysis? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
24
2019
Bipartisan “Draft Bill” to Amend ss. 100, 101 and 112 Released for Comment Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
27
2023
4.5-Year Prison Sentence in Shanghai for Counterfeiting of Anchor Butter Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
8
2015
Physiology/Medicine Nobels Awarded for Discoveries of “Natural Products” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
21
2013
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Software Patent Hearing in San Jose Shows Difference of Opinions Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
12
2019
Genotyping Patent Claims Do Not Escape The Reach of s. 101 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
4
2019
Federal Circuit Rules that PTAB Judges are Unconstitutionally Appointed Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
6
2013
Early Patent Trial and Appeal Board Orders Demonstrate Differences Between America Invents Act (AIA) Patent Trials and District Court Trials Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
14
2013
En (many) Banc(s) Federal Circuit Decides CLS Bank v. Alice Corp. Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
18
2013
CLS Bank v. Alice: Chasing the Rabbit Down the Bilski Hole Re: Patent Litigation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
12
2024
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Joins the Patent Prosecution Highway Improvement Initiative in Cooperation with the IP5 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
17
2024
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration to Revise Patent Certificates Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
3
2013
SAP Joins Patent and Trade Office against Versata in Eastern District of Virginia Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
30
2016
Patent Trends to Watch in 2016 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
25
2013
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Authorizes SAP to file Opposition to Versata’s Rehearing Request Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
16
2020
INO v. Praxair – Time for the Supreme Court to Step Up to the Plate? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
15
2016
IPRs And Settlement of Patent Infringement Cases Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
30
2020
Trademark Applicant & Chinese IP Agency Fined for Malicious Registration of Coronavirus Related Trademarks Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
9
2013
Divided Federal Circuit Panel Finds Computer System Claims Not Patent-Eligible Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
13
2013
Software Entrepreneur Calls New Zealand’s Software Ban ‘Worst Advice in History of Capitalism’ Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
26
2020
Chinese Rail System for Restaurant Meal Delivery Patent Infringed Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
27
2020
G S Cleantech Petitions Fed. Cir. for Rehearing En Banc Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins