Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Mar
19
2021
Shanxi Fines 7 Chinese Intellectual Property Firms for Unauthorized Practice of Law Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
22
2021
China’s Supreme People’s Court Releases 5-Year Intellectual Property Judicial Protection Plan Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
27
2021
China Joins EUIPO’s TMview Enabling Easier Searching of Chinese Trademarks Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
4
2021
China’s Supreme People’s Court Clarifies That Defendant May Be Entitled to Attorney Fees and Expenses in IP Litigation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
8
2021
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Releases Patent Linkage Administrative Adjudication Measures Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
1
2021
China’s Supreme People’s Court Rules Utility Model Patent Unenforceable if Corresponding Invention Patent Application Fails to Grants Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
29
2021
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Releases Patent Agency Industry Status Report (2020): Chinese Patent Attorneys File 222 Patent Applications Per Year on Average Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
10
2011
Use Petitions to Reverse Determination of No SNQ (Substantial New Questions of Patentability) in Inter Partes Reexamination Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
21
2021
China’s Supreme People’s Court Submits Report to the National People’s Congress on Judicial Work on the People’s Courts in Intellectual Property Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
4
2021
China’s Supreme People’s Court Rules Unintentional Short Payment of Annuity Fee Causes Termination of Patent Rights Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
1
2011
Report From Bio International Convention in DC– Everyone In the Patent Pool! Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
25
2011
Inequitable Conduct in Canada – Disarming the “Atomic Bomb” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
3
2011
Wegner Paper Probes Myriad Decisions Flaws Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
31
2011
Obviousness Objections Based On Combinations Of References – Consistent Warnings From The CAFC Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
29
2015
“If Wishes Were Horses” – Roberts’ Dissent from Myriad Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
20
2012
Supreme Court Reverses In Prometheus v. Mayo! Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
26
2012
Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) To Biotech Examiners – We’ll Get Back To You! Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
20
2012
Eurand v. Mylan –A “School Of Obviousness" Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
11
2012
USPTO Institutes “QUICK PATH” IDS Pilot Program Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
4
2017
“An Unusual Case” – Promega Corp. v. Life Technologies Corp. Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
23
2022
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Releases Guidelines for Intellectual Property Protection at Exhibitions Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
26
2012
Akami/McKesson Decision Re-defines Induced Infringement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
23
2022
Reminder: Extended CNIPA Closure for Chinese National Day Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
28
2018
Cleveland Clinic – Time to Purport an Inventive Concept in a Diagnostic Invention? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
19
2018
In re Urvashi Bhagat – The Slippery Slope of Natural Product Claims Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
26
2018
A Split Panel of the Federal Circuit Reverses PTAB Finding of Unpatentability Without Remand in DSS v. Apple Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
13
2023
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration to Close from January 21, 2023 to January 27, 2023 for Lunar New Year Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
21
2013
In Re Hubbell (Patent Litigation) Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
13
2023
China’s Supreme People’s Court and Supreme People’s Procuratorate Submit 5-Year Work Reports to the National People’s Congress Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
29
2013
Software Patents Too Slow To Keep Up With Software Innovation? NOT! Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
22
2013
Recent Board Decisions on § 101 Show Generally Consistent Approach (and some inscrutability with respect to business-related processes) Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
16
2023
Chinese Live Streamer Sentenced to 1 Year 10 Months Prison Term for Selling Counterfeit Disney Plush Toys Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
14
2018
Ex parte Parenteau – PTAB Skips Step One of the Mayo/Alice Test? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
25
2023
Chinese Utility Model Grants Down Over 21% in 2023 Q1 YoY; Trademark Grants Down Almost 53% Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
18
2013
Early Termination of Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Proceeding Shows Versatility of PTAB Patent Trials Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins