Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
May
3
2018
Ex Parte Buck: Can a Composition Claim be a Natural Phenomenon? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
29
2013
ACLU Files Petitioners’ Brief in AMP v. Myriad Appeal Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
23
2015
Australian Patent Office Proposes “Coding Only” Sequence Ban Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
16
2023
China to Grade Patent Agencies Nationwide Starting May 1, 2023 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
15
2018
PTAB Reverses 101 Rejection on Authentication Invention for MasterCard Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
30
2023
USTR Releases 2023 Special 301 Report on Intellectual Property – China Remains on Priority Watch List Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
16
2015
Prometheus v. Roxane – A Glimpse of Christmas Future? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
18
2018
The Abstract Idea Defense in a Patent Infringement Suit Jumped the Shark in Nike v Puma Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
20
2013
Dial-in Info to Hear the First Covered Business Method Patent Trial Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
28
2019
Barry v. Medtronic – Be Careful What You Use and Sell! Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
7
2019
Athena v. Mayo Part II – Iancu v. The Federal Circuit(?) Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
20
2023
China’s State Administration for Market Regulation Releases Draft Anti-monopoly Guidelines in the Field of Standard Essential Patents for Comment Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
29
2013
Wyeth v. Abbott Labs. – Picking Plaintiff’s Poison re: Patent Infringement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
25
2019
Ex parte Hazokaki – Big Data Correlations in Abstract Idea “Clothing” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
21
2013
Optimizing the Quality to Cost Ratio for Patent Portfolio Development Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
12
2013
Bayh-Dole Act Has Stood the Test of Time Re: Technological Innovation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
21
2013
European Patent Office Abolishes Prior “Short” Divisional Guidelines Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
30
2013
Canada’s ‘’Sister” Prior Art Law Differs From Ours, Eh! Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
27
2023
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Releases Third Batch of Guiding Cases for Administrative Protection of IP Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
12
2013
Supreme Court takes up CLS Bank v. Alice – Clarification or More Obfuscation To Come? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
10
2024
4.5 Year Prison Sentence and 5.5 Million RMB Fine in China Disney Criminal Trademark Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
23
2024
China Trademark Registrations Down 29% in 2023 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
21
2014
Federal Circuit Reaffirms Cybor Standard in Lightning Ballast Rehearing Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
11
2024
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Issues Annual Work Guidelines for Promoting High-Quality Development of IP Rights (2024) Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
13
2020
Supreme Court Denies Cert. in Vanda, Berkheimer and Athena Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
6
2024
China IP Trademark News - China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Releases Typical Cases of Administrative Enforcement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
28
2020
China National Intellectual Property Administration to Close for Additional Days Due to Wuhan Virus Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
11
2014
Advocates in Alice v. CLS Bank Debate “In the Cloud” in FCBA (Federal Circuit Bar Association) Webinar Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
9
2020
Advocacy vs. Candor Paves the Road to Inequitable Conduct Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
29
2020
China National Intellectual Property Administration Confirms Coronavirus Missed Deadline Policies Apply to non-Chinese Applicants Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
29
2016
Alice v. CLS Bank Software Patents Scorecard, Two Years Later Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
1
2016
Apotex v Wyeth Explores Structural Obviousness Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
3
2020
Chinese Patent Application for Coronavirus Vaccine Published Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
11
2020
The China National Intellectual Property Administration Aims to Speed Up Patent Prosecution Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
31
2016
Chisum and Mueller Dissect The Recent En Banc Decision In Apple v Samsung – “Smartphone Wars: Federal Circuit Shenanigans?” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins