Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Jan
20
2013
USPTO Publishes Final Rules for Micro-Entity Status and Fee Schedule Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
13
2018
Ex parte Ho – Burden Shifting in s.101 Rejections Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
27
2023
China’s Supreme People’s Court Releases Summaries of 43 Legal Application Issues from 2022 Intellectual Property Cases Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
22
2013
Is Software Different than other Technologies? Yes and No Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
9
2018
Kumar v. Iancu – The Dangers of an Overstuffed Preamble/Note on 37 CFR Part 4. Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
2
2023
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration to Cease Accepting Trademark Applications from Agencies that Failed to Reregister Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
14
2023
2022 Annual Report of the China National Intellectual Property Administration: 955,000 Patent Applications Were ‘Abnormal’ Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
9
2013
NOVARTIS A.G. v. UOI – What is Novelty in Indian Courts? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
25
2013
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Inter Partes Review (IPR) Petition Joinder Practice Gains Momentum Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
6
2023
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Releases Typical Cases of Abnormal Patent Applications Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
1
2013
WildTangent Files its Supreme Court Certiorari Petition in Patent Infringement Case – Part 1 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
18
2019
Cutting Through the Patent Thicket – The Little Bill that Couldn’t Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
18
2013
Another Software Patent Horror Story Unmasked and Debunked: This One You Won’t Believe Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
23
2023
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration to Allow Third-Party Challenges to Pharmaceutical Patent Term Extensions Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
2
2013
Novozymes Looses “Possession” Of Its Enzyme Re: Patent Litigation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
29
2024
Is the Patent Eligibility Act a Panacea for Claims to Diagnostics? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
3
2019
INO v. Praxair – Method-by-Selection Claims Fail Mayo/Alice Test Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
11
2016
The Biggest Technology Give-Away in History? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
26
2016
Myriad vs. Mayo – Detection vs. Processing at the Federal Circuit Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
10
2014
CLS v. Alice Bank And The Cult Of The “Abstract Idea” Re: Patent Litigation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
7
2014
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Patent Eligibility Guidelines – A Step Too Far For Natural Products? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
11
2020
Jaguar Land Rover Successfully Invalidates Chinese Design Patent for Landwind X7 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
27
2014
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) s.101 Guidelines – How to “Eviscerate Patent Law” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
1
2014
Supreme Court Oral Arguments – Can Alice Get Out Of “Wonderland”? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
26
2020
Shanghai People’s Procuratorate Launches Criminal Prosecution of Lego Block Infringers Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
16
2014
USPTO Forum to Discuss the Guidance on Subject Matter Eligibility of Claims Reciting Laws of Nature - U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
12
2020
Chinese Intellectual Property Agency Punished for Malicious Epidemic-Related Trademark Filings Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
22
2020
Patents Required to List on the Shanghai Stock Exchange’s Science & Technology Board Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
9
2020
BASF Corp. v SNF Holding Co: Section 102 Dissected Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
15
2020
Domestic Chinese Patent Filings Surge as Coronavirus Lockdowns End in March 2020 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
17
2020
31 Million RMB Fine Shows Dual Enforcement Mechanisms for Chinese Trademark Infringement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
2
2014
Splitting a KSR Hair - K/S HIMPP v. Hear-Ware Technologies, LLC Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
12
2020
Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court OKs Parallel Imports Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
28
2020
Who Are the Top Grantees of Chinese Invention Patents in 2019? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
26
2014
Drafting Software Patent Applications to Meet Section 101 after the Alice Decision Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins