Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Oct
19
2018
Yeda Res. and Dev. v. Mylan – “We don’t need no Stinkin’ Prior Art” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
27
2013
Federal Court Affirms Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) in Dawson v. Dawson and Bowman Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
26
2013
Progressive Casualty Litigation Stayed Pending Outcome of Liberty Mutual Covered Business Method Patents Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
16
2013
CLS Bank v. Alice Corp. (Part 2) Re: Patent Litigation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
13
2013
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Covered Business Method: Versata Patent Claims Unpatentable Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
10
2013
Supreme Court Decision Myriad Brings Out Its “Reserve Claims” To Challenge Ambry Re: Patent Eligibility Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
17
2019
Is the “Blocking Patent” Doctrine Part of the Obviousness Analysis? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
31
2013
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Grants Motion for Early Termination of Proceeding Before Covered Business Method Trial Institution Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
24
2019
Bipartisan “Draft Bill” to Amend ss. 100, 101 and 112 Released for Comment Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
27
2023
4.5-Year Prison Sentence in Shanghai for Counterfeiting of Anchor Butter Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
3
2013
Dr. Watson, Genomics and the Law Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
12
2013
Cert. Denied in Intema Ltd. v. PerkinElmer, Inc. Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
12
2019
Genotyping Patent Claims Do Not Escape The Reach of s. 101 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
28
2016
PTAB hits delete key on Intellectual Ventures patent for electronic content distribution Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
4
2019
Federal Circuit Rules that PTAB Judges are Unconstitutionally Appointed Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
18
2016
Limelight Networks v. Akamai Tech. – Supreme Court Cert. Denied Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
23
2014
Why the Bilski Analytical Framework is Fundamentally Flawed, and Why Diehr’s 101 Test is Better Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
12
2024
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Joins the Patent Prosecution Highway Improvement Initiative in Cooperation with the IP5 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
12
2014
Patent Office Board Clarifies Petitioner Role for Single Petition by Several Companies Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
3
2014
Amici Curiae Brief of Microsoft, Adobe and Hewlett-Packard: Alice Corp’s Patent Does Not Claim a Technological Innovation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
17
2024
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration to Revise Patent Certificates Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
23
2016
Due May 24 — Comments On Improving Patent Quality Metrics Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
16
2020
INO v. Praxair – Time for the Supreme Court to Step Up to the Plate? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
30
2020
Trademark Applicant & Chinese IP Agency Fined for Malicious Registration of Coronavirus Related Trademarks Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
16
2014
United States Patent Trademark Office (USPTO) Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance – 9th May Forum – Outcome and Opportunities Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
26
2020
Chinese Rail System for Restaurant Meal Delivery Patent Infringed Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
2
2014
Supreme Court Decision Nautilus v. Biosig – Solving Insoluble Ambiguity? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
4
2014
Consumer Watchdog v. Wis. Alumni Res. Foundation – Plaintiff Lacks Standing To Appeal Reexamination Loss Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
27
2020
G S Cleantech Petitions Fed. Cir. for Rehearing En Banc Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
28
2020
China’s New Civil Code Includes Punitive Damages in Intentional Intellectual Property Infringement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
4
2020
China’s Black People’s Toothpaste (Darlie) to be Renamed HYMULA? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
8
2016
Barrier to Business Patents Softening in China Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
12
2020
China Punishes Another Trademark Agency for Malicious Registration of Coronavirus-Related Trademarks Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
25
2020
China Releases Q3 2020 Patent Application Filing Data Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
2
2020
China’s 4th Intellectual Property Law Court May Be Arriving Soon Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins