Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Aug
31
2017
District Court: Network Gaming Patent Claims Not Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
18
2011
Infringement by Unobvious Changes – A Look (Way) Back Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
13
2022
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Issues Notice on Continuing to Severely Crack Down on Malicious Registration of Trademarks Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
22
2022
China Releases Report on Status of Judicial Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in Chinese Courts Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
22
2015
Board Limits Multiple IPR Challenges in Samsung Electronics v. Rembrandt Wireless Technologies Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
18
2017
Smart Sys v. Chicago Transit: One More Sorry Decision From The Federal Circuit Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
5
2022
Shijiazhuang Market Supervision Bureau Fines Trademark Agency 50,000 RMB for Attempting to Trademark Olympic Gold Medalist’s Social Media Account Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
21
2012
Indian Patent Office Grants Compulsory License To Bayer Drug Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
27
2012
Handbook of Quality Procedures Before the EPO Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
26
2018
Chinese Team Reports Cloning Two Monkeys Using the Same Nuclear Donor – But Don’t Try to Patent Them! Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
9
2022
USPTO Issues Yet Another Show Cause Order Against a Chinese Firm for Fraudulent TM Filings Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
17
2012
Why Myriad Should Drop Its Appeal Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
18
2022
China’s Supreme People’s Court Again Affirms Right to Set Global FRAND Rates in Standard Essential Patents in Nokia/OPPO Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
31
2023
The Office of the United States Trade Representative Releases 2022 Review of Notorious Markets for Counterfeiting and Piracy Naming 6 Chinese Online Markets Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
8
2015
Physiology/Medicine Nobels Awarded for Discoveries of “Natural Products” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
21
2013
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Software Patent Hearing in San Jose Shows Difference of Opinions Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
5
2018
Is the Abstract Idea Exclusion A Big Mistake for Software, or is There Something Important To It? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
10
2023
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration to Continue Cracking Down on IP Agency Misbehavior in “Blue Sky” Rectification Campaign Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
4
2023
Drop in Chinese Utility Model Grants Accelerates in April 2023 in Shift from Quantity to Quality Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
6
2013
Early Patent Trial and Appeal Board Orders Demonstrate Differences Between America Invents Act (AIA) Patent Trials and District Court Trials Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
14
2013
En (many) Banc(s) Federal Circuit Decides CLS Bank v. Alice Corp. Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
18
2013
CLS Bank v. Alice: Chasing the Rabbit Down the Bilski Hole Re: Patent Litigation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
26
2023
Does the “Patent Eligibility Restoration Act of 2023” Revive Diagnostic Claims? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
7
2019
Mayo Wins in Another s. 101 Appeal – Discovery of a Useful Natural Correlation is not Patent Eligible Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
25
2023
15 Rolex Counterfeiters Sentenced to up to 6.5 Years Prison in 300 Million RMB Counterfeit Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
3
2013
SAP Joins Patent and Trade Office against Versata in Eastern District of Virginia Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
30
2016
Patent Trends to Watch in 2016 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
25
2013
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Authorizes SAP to file Opposition to Versata’s Rehearing Request Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
15
2016
IPRs And Settlement of Patent Infringement Cases Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
9
2013
Divided Federal Circuit Panel Finds Computer System Claims Not Patent-Eligible Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
13
2013
Software Entrepreneur Calls New Zealand’s Software Ban ‘Worst Advice in History of Capitalism’ Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
23
2023
China’s Supreme People’s Court Releases the 39th Batch of Guiding Cases Covering Intellectual Property Law Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
22
2024
Beijing Internet Court Releases Translation of Li vs. Liu Recognizing Copyright in Generative AI Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
30
2024
China’s Supreme People’s Court Upholds 79 Million RMB Win for Château Lafite Rothschild in Wine Trademark Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
11
2019
OSI v. Apotex – Christmas in October! Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins