Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Apr
4
2021
China’s State Administration for Market Regulation Releases 2021 Legislative Work Plan Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
16
2021
Guest Post: Well-Known Mark Recognitions in China – Part III Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
18
2014
Mayo Meet Alice Meet Myriad – Fed. Cir. Appreciates “Abstract Art” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
13
2017
Strong Intellectual Property Protection Encourages Innovation, according to Congressman Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
13
2021
Chinese Invention Patent Grants Up 63% in May 2021 YoY Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
17
2021
China’s Supreme People’s Court: Declaratory Judgement Actions Involving Invalidated Patents are Possible Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
3
2021
Chinese Patent Bar Applicants Hits New High in 2021 – Over 50,000 People Applied to Take the Exam Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
13
2021
How Fast is the Patent Prosecution Highway in China? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
9
2011
Petitions Practice for SNQ Findings in Inter Partes Reexaminations Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
30
2021
Chinese Patent Office Announces Record 1.04 Million RMB Fine for Unauthorized Practice of Patent Law Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
21
2011
Federal Circuit Decision in In re Tanaka Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
12
2011
TiVo’s Reexamination Strategy Helps Win a Stay in the Northern District of California Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
11
2022
Shanghai’s No. 3 Intermediate Court Sentences DuPont Counterfeiter to 2+ Years in Prison Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
30
2011
“Particular Machine” not required: Ex Parte Dietz et al., Appeal 2009-008029, BPAI Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
12
2011
Boston Scientific Corp. v. Johnson & Johnson: Written Description Requirement Spreads its Wings Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
5
2017
Sea Change in IPR or Just an SOS? – Aqua Products, Inc. v. Matal Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
18
2015
Federal Circuit Interprets Board’s Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Standard – Part II Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
15
2022
Beijing Intellectual Property Court Announces China’s First Patent Linkage Judgment Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
10
2022
China’s Patent Office Releases Top 10 Patent Reexamination Invalidation Cases of 2021 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
24
2022
Beijing IP Court Dismisses First Trademark Case Under New Supreme People’s Court Jurisdictional Rules Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
22
2012
Supreme Court Declines To Review “New And Improved” Written Description Requirement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
20
2012
Eurand v. Mylan –A “School Of Obviousness" Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
11
2012
USPTO Institutes “QUICK PATH” IDS Pilot Program Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
14
2022
China’s Supreme People’s Court: Incorrect PCT Applicant Has Good Faith Duty to Actual Rightsholder Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
26
2012
Akami/McKesson Decision Re-defines Induced Infringement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
2
2022
Chinese Trademark Office Cracks Down on World Cup Trademark Squatting Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
8
2023
CNIPA Releases Interim Measures for Handling Examination Business Related to the Implementation of the Revised Patent Law Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
19
2023
China’s Supreme People’s Court & Supreme People’s Procuratorate Release Draft Interpretation of Handling Criminal Cases of Intellectual Property Infringement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
25
2018
Ex parte Galloway – Two Correlations are Better than One Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
23
2018
Interval Licensing v. AOL — Judge Plager’s Concurring Dissent Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
9
2018
Ex Parte Young – Expanding the Scope of an “Abstract Idea.” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
20
2018
Ex Parte Schwartz – A Pyrric Reversal of a 101 Rejection Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
10
2018
Bhagat v. Iancu – Did the Myriad Decision Overrule Funk Bros.? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
21
2013
In Re Hubbell (Patent Litigation) Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
29
2013
Software Patents Too Slow To Keep Up With Software Innovation? NOT! Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins