Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Jul
21
2014
Advantages of Filing More Than One IPR (Inter Partes Review) Against A Single Patent Armstrong Teasdale
Jan
14
2015
PTAB Grants First Opposed Motion to Amend Claims--Patent Trial and Appeal Board Armstrong Teasdale
Apr
14
2015
Can Priority Be Established Through Incorporation By Reference? Armstrong Teasdale
Apr
29
2014
U.S. Supreme Court Eases Rules for Attorneys’ Fees Awards in Patent Cases Armstrong Teasdale
Oct
12
2016
Supreme Court Refuses to Consider Constitutionality of IPR Review Armstrong Teasdale
Jan
27
2017
USPTO Amendment Requires Additional Proof of Use for Trademarks Armstrong Teasdale
Oct
20
2014
IPR (Inter Partes Review) Challenge to Pharmaceutical Compound Patent Denied Armstrong Teasdale
May
26
2017
Supreme Court Limits Venue Shopping in Patent Infringement Lawsuits Armstrong Teasdale
Jul
2
2015
IPR Institution Can Be Denied Based on Petition Length or Failure to Identify Related Matters Armstrong Teasdale
Jun
21
2012
Number of gTLD Applications Nearly Quadruples Expectations 7 Month Objection Period Opens Armstrong Teasdale
Sep
9
2012
Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc.: Federal Circuit Makes Proving Induced Infringement Easier Armstrong Teasdale
May
21
2013
CLS Bank v. Alice Corp. Leaves Rules for Patent-Eligibility of Computer-Implemented Inventions Unclear Armstrong Teasdale
Sep
16
2014
Do PTAB Final Decisions Addressing a Portion of the Challenged Claims Create Work for Overburdened Courts? Armstrong Teasdale
Jul
19
2013
How Intellectual Property (IP) Counsel Can Capitalize on Technological Advances Marcus Evans
Feb
17
2013
Building a Ready for Action Intellectual Property Portfolio Strategy for In-House Counsel Marcus Evans
Jun
1
2015
Unprecedented Move: Vox Populi Extends Sunrise Deadline for “.sucks” Domain Registration Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Feb
21
2023
It’s Official: European Unitary Patent And Unified Patent Court Arrive On June 1, What You Should Know And Do To Prepare Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Nov
19
2015
Pennsylvania Supreme Court “Considers” Noncompetes: Mere Continued Employment Not Enough Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Feb
11
2019
In Surprising Ruling, McDonald’s Loses BIG MAC Trademark Registration In The EU Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Aug
3
2023
Estoppel Pursuant To Section 315(E)(1): Ongoing USPTO Developments Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mar
18
2019
New Rules Issued For Reporting Disclosures And Filing Patent Applications Funded By A Federal Agency Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Feb
24
2014
Federal Circuit Retains Non-Deference Standard for Claim Construction Barnes & Thornburg LLP
May
12
2020
USPTO Revises Deadlines For Some Patent And Trademark Matters Delayed By COVID-19 Challenges Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jan
21
2015
Supreme Court Alters the Standard of Review For Patent Claim Construction Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
30
2015
USPTO Provides Meaningful Direction on Patentable Subject Matter Eligibility Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Oct
12
2015
Think Before You Shoot on Noncompete: Why The Threatening Letter May Not Be Your First Move Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Feb
1
2019
Revised Guidance Provides More Objective Paradigm For Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Apr
14
2016
EU Updates Community Trade Mark System, Warns of Potential Imposters Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
16
2016
Four Big Questions to Help You Understand the Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Dec
18
2014
2014 Interim Guidance on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Provide Limited Direction for Software Implemented Inventions Barnes & Thornburg LLP
May
27
2015
High Court Rules That Good Faith Belief Of Invalidity Is Not Defense To Induced Infringement Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Aug
5
2013
The Trademark Clearinghouse: Safeguard Your Trademark Online Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mar
17
2014
U.S. to Hand Over Control of Domain Naming System by September 2015 Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
16
2016
PTAB’S First Post-Grant Review Decisions Invalidates Livestock Patents Under Alice Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
12
2016
Federal Circuit Provides Guidance on When Outsourcing Manufacturing Constitutes a Patent-Invalidating Sale Barnes & Thornburg LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins