Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Jun
5
2015
SCHOTT Gemtron Corporation v. SSW Holding Company, Inc.: Final Written Decision Finding Non-Analogous Art Faegre Drinker
Jun
18
2015
SDI Technologies v. Bose Corporation: Final Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-00343 Faegre Drinker
Jun
26
2015
Samsung v. Rembrandt Wireless: Denying Institution of Petition Based on Previously Submitted Art IPR2015-00555 Faegre Drinker
Jun
30
2015
Sure-Fire Electrical Corp v. Yongjiang Yin and Shenzhen EL Lighting Co: Granting Request for Rehearing Based Upon Showing That Secondary Ground Would Defeat Swear-Behind Defense IPR2014-01448 Faegre Drinker
Jul
9
2015
Sharp Corporation v. Surpass Tech Innovation: Denying Request for Rehearing Where a Drafting Error Within a Claim is Not Shown IPR2015-00021 Faegre Drinker
Jul
24
2015
Denying Request to File Corrected Patent Owner Response Removing Citations to Expunged Exhibit Faegre Drinker
Aug
17
2015
AL-KO Kober v. Lippert Components Manufacturing - Final Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-00313 Faegre Drinker
Aug
20
2015
Arris Group v. C-Cation Tech: Indemnitor Merely Sending Advice Does Not Result in Privity IPR2015-00635 Faegre Drinker
Sep
22
2012
The Federal Circuit’s Recent “Safe Harbor” Ruling Could Impact Biosimilars Drug Development Faegre Drinker
Sep
10
2015
TRW Automotive US v. Magna Electronics Inc: Final Written Decision Confirming All Challenged Claims IPR2014-00251 Faegre Drinker
Sep
26
2015
PURDUE PHARMA L.P. v. DEPOMED, INC.Final Written Decision Finding No Claims Unpatentable Because Lack of Reason for Combining Known Features IPR2014-00377 Faegre Drinker
Oct
9
2015
Kingbright Electronics v. Cree: Decision on Institution Denied IPR2015-00748 Faegre Drinker
Oct
14
2015
ServiceNow, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard, Co., Patent Claims Not Eligible for CBM Review CBM2015-00108 Faegre Drinker
Oct
26
2015
Ford Motor Company v. Signal IP: Granting Motion to Stay Reexamination where Board is Considering a Motion to Consolidate IPR2015-00860 Faegre Drinker
Nov
4
2015
Coalition for Affordable Drugs II LLC v. NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Granting Institution of Petition By Coalition For Affordable Drugs IPR2015-01093 Faegre Drinker
Nov
18
2015
Apple v. Smartflash: Dismissing Petitioner Due to the Board Finding Estoppel under Section 325(e)(1) CBM2015-00015 Faegre Drinker
Nov
23
2015
Kinetic Tech v. Skyworks Solutions: Final Written Decision Finding Evidence of “Printed Publication” Insufficient IPR2014-00690 Faegre Drinker
Dec
5
2015
CaptionCall, LLC v. Ultratec, Inc - Decision Denying Request For Rehearing IPR2013-00541 Faegre Drinker
Dec
22
2015
Par Pharmaceutical v. Horizon Therapeutics: Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2015-01117 Faegre Drinker
Jan
10
2016
AVX Corporation v. Greatbatch: Final Written Decision Denying Motion to Amend IPR2014-01361 Faegre Drinker
Jan
12
2016
Johns Manville Corp v. Knauf Insulation: Expert Testimony Missing Underlying Facts or Data Receives Little Or No Weight IPR2015-01633 Faegre Drinker
Jul
18
2013
Supreme Court Ruling on Human Gene Patenting Faegre Drinker
Feb
16
2016
BMC Medical, 3B Products, and 3B Medical v. ResMed: Final Written Decision Finding Some Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-01363 Faegre Drinker
Feb
22
2016
CHUMS and CROAKIES v. CABLZ: No Nexus When Commercial Success Is Dependent On Element In Prior Art IPR2014-01240 Faegre Drinker
Mar
2
2016
Mangrove Partners Master Fund Apple and Black Swamp IP v. VirnetX: Request For Rehearing Granted-In-Part IPR2015-01047 Faegre Drinker
Mar
7
2016
Jiawei Tech v. Simon Nicholas Richmond: Decision Denying Petitioner’s Motions to Expunge IPR2014-00935, -00936, -00938 Faegre Drinker
Mar
11
2016
Runway Safe LLC v. Engineered Arresting Systems: Denying Institution Where Obviousness Rationale Was Already Addressed in Prior Art IPR2015-01921 Faegre Drinker
Mar
20
2016
Continental Automotive GmbH, Kia Motors Corporation, and Kia Motors America, Inc. v. Netlach, LLC, Patent Owner’s Request for Adverse Judgment Granted IPR2015-00481 Faegre Drinker
Apr
18
2016
Ubisoft, Inc. v. Guitar Apprentice, Inc.: Final Written Decision Revising Previous “Means” Construction In View of Williamson v. Citrix IPR2015-00298 Faegre Drinker
Apr
21
2016
Boston Scientific Corporation v. UAB Research Foundation: Request For Rehearing Granted and IPR Instituted IPR2015-00918 Faegre Drinker
May
27
2016
Steadymed Ltd. v. United Therapeutics Corp. - Motion to Submit Supplemental Information as to Translation Accuracy Granted IPR2016-00006 Faegre Drinker
Jun
20
2016
Ubisoft, Inc. v. Uniloc USA, Inc. Denying Joinder With Terminated Proceeding and Denying Institution Faegre Drinker
May
21
2014
Callidus Software Inc. v. Versata Development Group, Inc., Denying Leave to File a Motion to Expedite Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response Faegre Drinker
May
28
2014
Avaya Inc., Dell Inc., Sony Corp. of America, and Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc., Final Written Decision (Motion to Amend) IPR2013-00071 Faegre Drinker
Jul
26
2016
Trademark Professionals - Are You Brand Obsessed? Take This Quiz to Find Out! Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins