Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Oct
24
2023
Sisvel International S.A. v. Sierra Wireless, Inc., No. 2022-1387, 2022-1492 (Fed. Cir. Sept 1, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
13
2023
Federal Circuit Evaluates Impact of the Final Written Decision (FWD) in a Parallel Inter-Partes Review (IPR) on District Court’s decision of Invalidity and Infringement Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
21
2023
PTAB’s Authority to Issue a Final Written Decision After a Statutory Deadline Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
14
2024
AI-Assisted Inventions: Are They Patentable? Who is the Inventor? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
7
2016
TTAB Precedential Decision: Time Limit for Adding Claims Is Tolled by Filing of Cancellation Within Registration’s Fifth Anniversary Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
29
2016
Parent Company Furnishes Cancellation of Subsidiary’s Trademark Registration Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
16
2016
Consumers Are Unlikely to Confuse Yelp with Local Property Management Company Using Same Tagline in Ads, Court Rules Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
11
2014
Amgen/Sandoz Disputes Will Clarify BPCIA (Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act) Issues Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
24
2017
100 Million Reasons For Open Source Compliance Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
29
2021
Is Lawful Possession of a Trade Secret Enough for Standing to Sue for Misappropriation? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
29
2009
What To Do When Your .CN Domain Name Is Already Taken Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
11
2011
The Ninth Circuit's Holding in Levi Strauss v. Abercrombie & Fitch - "Degree of Similarity" Is But One of Six TDRA Factors, Not the Threshold Test -- Marks An Important Decision Elucidating The Proper Dilution Standard Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
25
2017
Deadline Approaching: Action Required by December 31 To Avoid Losing DMCA Safe Harbor Protection Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
27
2018
UPDATE: The Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act vs. The California Uniform Trade Secrets Act Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
11
2023
Early 2023 Update: Where Are Plaintiffs Filing Patent Cases Now? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
15
2023
Copyright Office Guidance on AI Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
13
2023
Copyright Office Artificial Intelligence Initiative and Resource Guide Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
31
2023
Inguran, LLC, DBA STGenetics V. ABS Global, INC., Genius PLC, No. 2022-1385 (July 5, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
8
2016
He’s got 99 Problems, But a Breach Might NOT be One Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
5
2019
Do NOT Give NDAs the Short Shrift Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
17
2023
United Cannabis Corporation v. Pure Hemp Collective Inc. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
24
2023
In Re: Cellect, LLC No. 2022-1293 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 28, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
18
2016
Federal Circuit Reaffirms Its Longstanding Patent Exhaustion Precedents in Lexmark. v. Impression Products (Fed. Cir. Feb. 12, 2016) (en banc) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
18
2023
Federal Circuit Vacates Invalidity Judgement Based on Collateral Estoppel from a Case Subsequently Vacated and Rebukes Plaintiff’s About-Face on Its Stipulated Claim Construction Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
21
2023
Anticipation and Obviousness in Patent Law: An Analysis of Recent IPR Decisions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
14
2024
Federal Circuit Rules on Inventor-as-Lexicographer Definitions and the Proper Scope of Reply and Sur-Reply Briefing Following Patent Owner Responses to IPR Institution Decisions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
27
2014
Are Circuit Courts of Appeal Split as to the Preclusive Impact Accorded to Prior Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Decisions? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
6
2019
Left Empty Handed: Value Shut Down on Written Prior Art, Highlighting Importance of System Art Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
20
2014
FTC (Federal Trade Commission) Targets Reporting of Licensing of Pharmaceutical Patents With Special Rules for Premerger Notification: What You Need to Know Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
7
2020
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Patents – Will the Patent Office Change the Rules? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
10
2024
How to Recover Attorneys’ Fees in a Schedule A Trademark Case in the Northern District of Illinois Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
25
2020
COVID-19 and Trade Secrets: Is Your Business Prepared to Protect its Trade Secrets While Your Employees Work From Home? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
9
2020
4 Steps to More Effectively Use NDAs to Protect Confidential Information Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
16
2020
Delaware 101 Pleading Analysis Leaves Parties Guessing and Prosecutors Moving to Adapt Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
14
2020
Ixchel v. Biogen: California B2B Noncompetes Do Not Per Se Violate B&P Section 16600, and Are Instead Subject to Rule of Reason Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins