Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Oct
15
2015
Ninth Circuit “Twists” Things Up for IP Protection in Yoga Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
25
2016
Ninth Circuit: Claims Proceed in California Despite French Forum Selection Clause Jackson Lewis P.C.
Nov
30
2022
Ninth Circuit: Commercial Brand Names Can Be Expressive Speech Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Sep
9
2020
Ninth Circuit: Under the “Asserted Truth Doctrine” (f/k/a “Copyright Estoppel”) Authors of Nonfiction Cannot Later Claim a Work is Fictional to Pursue a Copyright Case Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Feb
2
2017
Ninth Circuit’s Recent Patent Local Rules Amendments: Elevating Damages Considerations to Same Level as Infringement and Invalidity Contentions Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Sep
15
2015
Nissan North America v. Norman IP Holdings: Final Written Decision Finding Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-00564 Faegre Drinker
Oct
7
2015
Nissan North America, Inc. v. Hitachi Automotive Systems, LTD., and Hyundai Motor America: Denying Motion to Submit Supplemental Information Attempting to Change the Type of Evidence Relied On in the Petition IPR2014-01548 Faegre Drinker
Sep
2
2015
Nissan North America, Inc. v. Norman IP Holdings, LLC, Final Written Decision Finding Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-00563 Faegre Drinker
Sep
17
2014
Nissan North America, Inc. v. Norman IP Holdings, LLC: Order Denying Authorization for Motion to Stay IPR2014-00563 Faegre Drinker
Jul
6
2015
Nissan, Toyota, Subaru, Honda, Ford, Jaguar, Land Rover, and Volvo v. Cruise Control Technologies: Final Written Decision Faegre Drinker
Jul
5
2023
NIST’s AI Risk Management Framework Helps Businesses Address AI Risk Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
13
2023
Nitpicking Allowed When Determining Statutory Damages McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
22
2017
NJ Court Grants Exceptional Case Fees Based on Speculative Infringement Suit McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
19
2019
NLRB Aligns With Supreme Court Precedent On Nonemployee Union Organizer Access To Company Property Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Aug
28
2018
NLRB Clarifies Key Developing Issues for Union and Non-Union Employers Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
31
2023
NLRB General Counsel Issues Memo Targeting Noncompete Agreements for Nonmanagerial and Nonsupervisory Employees Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Jun
12
2018
NLRB Guides Employers on Handbook Rules Post-Boeing Ballard Spahr LLP
Sep
14
2023
NNCO Will Host Symposium on “Enabling the Nanotechnology Revolution” on October 10, 2023 Bergeson & Campbell, P.C.
Aug
26
2022
No (More) Bites at the mRNA Apple: Pfizer and BioNTech Seek Declaratory Judgment of Noninfringement Relating to Their COVID-19 Vaccine in New Suit K&L Gates
Mar
26
2015
No Acquiescence Defense in Fifth Circuit Without Significant Investment in Reliance: Pennzoil-Quaker State Co. v. Miller Oil & Gas Operations McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
25
2018
No Amount of Prior Art Obviates Inquiry of Secondary Considerations of Non-Obviousness McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
30
2013
No Anti-Suit Injunction Where Foreign Arbitration Controls Resolution of Licensing Dispute McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
1
2013
No Appellate Jurisdiction over Clarifications of Existing Injunction Re: Intellectual Property Litigation McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
21
2021
No Appellate Jurisdiction to Review Post-Verdict Appeal of Previously Denied SJ Motion McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
1
2016
No Approval for Generic Product for Treatment of Rosacea McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
18
2013
No Avoiding BPCIA (Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act) For Biosimilars: No Patent Declaratory Judgment Action Before Biosimilars Application Is Filed Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
9
2020
No Bite on Parties’ Unenforceable Agreement to Agree to Sell Apple Trees McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
27
2019
No Brainer: Summary Judgment Based On Non-asserted Grounds Procedurally Improper McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
14
2022
No Breach of Contract Where Company Disclosed Its Own Non-Public Information McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
28
2018
No Bright Line for Determining Real Parties in Interest McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
1
2013
No Case or Controversy in Declaratory Judgment Against Patentee Who Sued Manufacturer’s Customers McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
12
2022
No Claim of Conversion for Intellectual Property or LLC Membership Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Oct
30
2013
No Claims, No Drawings, No Problems Re: Patent Applicants Bracewell LLP
Apr
3
2017
No Clear Consensus on Patent Venue During TC Heartland Oral Argument Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
30
2015
No Clear Notice, No Contempt: U.S. Polo Ass’n v. PRL USA Holdings - Trademark Litigation McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins