Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Jul
13
2023
Personal Jurisdiction? Selling Products via Interactive Website Will Do It McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2017
Personal Web Technologies v. Apple: Obviousness Does Not Speak for Itself McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
16
2019
Personalized Cancer Therapy Found Nonobvious Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
24
2010
Personalized Medicine and Patentability: Important Considerations After Healthcare Reform Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
19
2018
Personalized Medicine Gets a Boost from Federal Circuit’s Vanda Pharma Decision Mintz
May
10
2018
Personalized Medicine Gets a Boost from Federal Circuit’s Vanda Pharma Decision – PART II: Enforcement Mintz
Mar
24
2012
Personalized Medicine Patents Rejected by U.S. Supreme Court Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Sep
26
2012
Personalized Medicine Takes Off While Diagnostic Assays are Grounded Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
10
2019
Personalized Therapy Patent Falls as Patent-Ineligible Foley & Lardner LLP
May
10
2016
Pescetarian’s Delight: Ninth Circuit Extends Non-Compete Term Beyond Contractual Period Mintz
Mar
23
2016
PETA Isn’t Monkeying Around With Copyright Ownership Rights Mintz
Apr
4
2024
Peter Rabbit Discovers Compliance! Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
21
2015
Petition Denied For Failing To Name Real Party-In-Interest: Inter Partes Review Armstrong Teasdale
Apr
25
2011
Petition Granted for Rehearing en banc of Akamai Technologies v. Limelight Networks Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
21
2013
Petitioner Allowed to Submit Supplemental Information After Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Trial and Appeal Board Trial Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
3
2014
Petitioner Barred from Raising Arguments Not in Petition, TRW Automotive US LLC v. Magna Elecs., Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
15
2022
Petitioner Estopped Due to Final Written Decisions in Parallel IPR Proceedings with Petitions Filed Simultaneously Finnegan
Dec
15
2023
Petitioner Failed to Establish Standing in IPR Appeal Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
24
2023
Petitioner Reply May Include New Evidence if Responsive to Patent Owner and Based on Original Legal Contentions McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
7
2022
Petitioner Succeeds in Wiping Out Challenged Claims at PTAB Finnegan
Sep
30
2015
Petitioner Wins Uncontested Alice Fight McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
5
2017
Petitioners Bear the Burden of Proving Invalidity of Amended Claims in IPR Proceedings K&L Gates
Mar
1
2015
Petitioners Cannot Respond to Substantive Issue Raised in Preliminary Response McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
2
2015
Petitioners Denied Second Bite at IPR (Inter Partes Review) Petition McDermott Will & Emery
May
1
2015
Petitioners Must Present Sufficient Evidence to Establish Inherency Mintz
Feb
25
2015
Petitioners v. Simon Nicholas Richmond: Order Granting Motion to Expedite IPR2015-00580 Faegre Drinker
Feb
27
2020
Petitioner’s Reply Argument in IPR Is Not an Impermissible New Theory McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
9
2011
Petitions Practice for SNQ Findings in Inter Partes Reexaminations Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
31
2017
Petitions Seeking CBM Review Continue Uphill Battle After Unwired Planet McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
20
2014
Petroleum Geo-Services Inc. v. WesternGeco LLC, Decision on Institution IPR2014-00689 Faegre Drinker
Dec
19
2014
Petroleum Geo-Services Inc. v. WesternGeco LLC, Denying Institution IPR2014-00678 Faegre Drinker
Feb
27
2015
Petroleum Geo-Services Inc. v. WesternGeco LLC: Reduced Deposition Time in Related AIA Proceedings McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
25
2016
Petroleum Geo-Services v. WesternGeco - Request for Rehearing of Final Written Decision Denied IPR2014-00688 Faegre Drinker
Jul
21
2015
Petroleum Geo-Services v. WesternGeco: Denying Motion for Live Testimony to Respond to Lack of Nexus Assertions IPR2014-00687 Faegre Drinker
Apr
3
2015
Petroleum Geo-Services v. WesternGeco: Granting Institution of Review IPR2014-01475 Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins