Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
May
28
2014
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. and PNC Bank, N.A. v. Intellectual Ventures, Decision Denying Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Review Faegre Drinker
May
7
2021
Podcast Series: Last Month at the Federal Circuit - April 2021 Finnegan
Feb
24
2021
Podcast Series: Last Month at the Federal Circuit - February 2021 Finnegan
Oct
19
2022
Podcast: Spilling Secrets: Non-Compete Agreements for In-House and Outside Lawyers – Employment Law This Week Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Mar
5
2013
Point of novelty Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jun
25
2014
Polaris Wireless, Inc. v. TruePosition, Inc., Granting Leave to File Revised Motion for Observations Faegre Drinker
Nov
7
2014
Polaris Wireless, Inc. v. TruePosition, Inc.: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00323 Faegre Drinker
Jun
11
2014
Polaris Wireless, Inc. v. TruePosition, Inc.: Order Authorizing Motion for Observations and Denying Motion to Strike Faegre Drinker
Aug
25
2022
Police Raids Crack Two Cases Valued at More than 110 Million RMB in Counterfeit e-Cigarettes in Hezhou, China Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
2
2012
Politician Settling Case for Unauthorized Use of Music at Campaign Events Mintz
Nov
28
2016
Poly-America v. API Industries: Disavowal of Claim Scope in Trash Bag Patent McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
26
2019
Polymorphic Patent Survives Obviousness Challenge McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
23
2014
Pom Wonderful and Coke in a Juicy Battle at the U.S. Supreme Court Mintz
Feb
1
2015
Pom Wonderful Likely to Succeed in Infringement Claim Against “pŏm”-Branded Beverage: Pom Wonderful LLC v. Hubbard McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
31
2015
Poor Litigation Conduct by Prevailing Party Not Enough to Obviate Exceptional-Case Doctrine McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
12
2013
Poor Quality is No Defense to Trademark Infringement Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Dec
23
2019
POP Provides Clarity Regarding Level of Proof for Printed Publications Before the PTAB K&L Gates
Apr
27
2018
Pornography Dispute Sheds Light on DMCA Safe Harbor Defense: Ventura Content v. Motherless, Inc. and Joshua Lang McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
30
2015
Portion of California Resale Royalty Act Struck Down as Unconstitutional McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
21
2015
Positec USA, Inc. and RW Direct, Inc. v. Black & Decker Inc., Final Written Decision IPR2013-00502 Faegre Drinker
Feb
10
2013
Positioning a Finger Flap Between Cans in a Carton Is Non-Obvious McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
15
2023
Positioning for the Exit at the Entrance Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
5
2017
Positive Developments – EUTM Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
10
2016
Positive FDA Advisory Committee Vote for First Monoclonal Antibody Biosimilar – But Will Patent Dispute Delay Launch? Mintz
Aug
12
2012
Posner to Apple/Motorola: No Damages, No Injunction, No Trial McDermott Will & Emery
May
27
2016
Possible, Probable Features of Prior Art Do Not Establish Inherency McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
3
2015
Post Exclusivity Issues For Biologics Hunton Andrews Kurth
Dec
17
2014
Post Holiday Trademark Sale!!!!!!! Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, P.C.
Dec
16
2021
Post-AIA Patents Are Not Shielded from Interferences McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
25
2014
Post-Alice Federal Circuit Finds Internet Advertising Method Not Patent Eligible McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
4
2015
Post-Alice—Claims Directed to an Abstract Idea Must Have Meaningful Limitations McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
16
2021
Post-Brexit Considerations for Trade Mark Owners - February 2021 Finnegan
May
20
2021
Post-Brexit UK Intellectual Property Protection Katten
Dec
2
2011
Post-eBay Demise of the Presumption of Irreparable Harm for Awarding Injunctive Relief McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
26
2015
Post-Expiration Royalties Remain Stuck in Web of 50-Year Precedent Hunton Andrews Kurth
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins