Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Dec
1
2014
Arizona Supreme Court Holds That The Uniform Trade Secrets Act Only Preempts Claims for Misappropriation of Trade Secrets, Not Other Confidential Information Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP
Dec
1
2014
Covered Business Method (CBM) Patents: Claims Directed to a Mental Task Are Abstract, but Computerizing an Old Practice Is Not McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
1
2014
Federal Circuit Invalidates Online Advertising Patent As Unpatentable Abstract Idea Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP
Nov
30
2014
No Joinder Without Proof That Grounds Could Not Have Been Raised Previously McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
30
2014
U.S. Federal Trade Commission Settles First Ever Enforcement Action Against Patent Troll And Its Lawyers Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP
Nov
30
2014
Patent Owner’s General Counsel Allowed to Substitute Designated Counsel at Oral Hearing McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
30
2014
White House Calls On Congress Again To Make Illegal Online Streaming A Felony Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP
Nov
29
2014
Joint Motions to Terminate Pre-Institution IPRs Should Explain Why Termination Is Appropriate McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
29
2014
Federal Circuit Says District Courts Should Freely Grant Stays When CBM Proceeding Instituted Mintz
Nov
29
2014
President Obama Names Federal Circuit Nominee To Fill Rader Vacancy Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP
Nov
29
2014
Independent Corroboration Required To Prove Conception McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
28
2014
Play Nice in the Deposition Sandbox McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
28
2014
SAP America, Inc. v. Lakshmi Arunachalam: Denying Rehearing Request IPR2013-00194 Faegre Drinker
Nov
28
2014
No Cross-Examination of Expert at the Close of Evidence McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
28
2014
Prior Art-Related Submissions That Go to the Merits Are Supplemental “Evidence,” Not Supplemental “Information” McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
28
2014
PTAB Expands Discovery for Inter Partes Review McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
28
2014
Brazil: An Update of the Most Relevant Events for Pharmaceutical Companies in 2014: Part 3 of a 5-Part Series Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Nov
28
2014
High Evidentiary Threshold for Diligence in Reducing Invention to Practice McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
28
2014
Contract Prohibiting Patent Challenges Does Not Preclude Standing to File IPR Petition McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
28
2014
Look Beyond the Registration to Determine Likelihood of Confusion Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
28
2014
To Be A Real Party-In-Interest Entity Must Control or Fund the Litigation McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
27
2014
Patentee May Cancel but May Not Substitute Claims when Proposed Amended Claims Are Not Shown To Be Unobvious McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
27
2014
Not So “Routine Discovery” in AIA (American Invents Act) Proceedings McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
27
2014
Good(s) Intentions – What's Enough to Establish Bona Fide Intent to Use Trademark? Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
27
2014
Motion for Observation Must Follow Guidelines re: Patent Litigation McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
26
2014
Warning: No Sandbagging Experimental Evidence: Baxter Healthcare Corp. v. Millenium Biologix, LLC McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
26
2014
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to Rehear Suprema: Disposition Could Have Significant Repercussions for ITC Jurisdiction Mintz
Nov
26
2014
Ineligible Subject Matter in One Court Is Still Ineligible in Another McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
26
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – November 26, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
26
2014
No En Banc Review for Use of Post Invention Information in Obviousness Analysis McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
26
2014
Generic Top Level Domains - Current Sunrise Periods Open--December 2014 Update Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
26
2014
Getting It Right the First Time: United States Postal Service v. Return Mail, Inc.; Conopco, Inc. v. The Proctor & Gamble Co. McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
26
2014
Federal Government May Be Liable for Patent Infringement by Private Companies Performing Quasi-Governmental Functions McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
26
2014
Federal Circuit: District Courts Should Not Nit-PIC (Patents) McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
26
2014
Federal Circuit Addresses Plethora of Issues in Affirming $19.5 Million Damage Award McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
26
2014
Claim Differentiation Fails to Save Patentees from Their Own Words McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
25
2014
Actual Negotiations Trump 40-Year Georgia-Pacific Test to Determine Type of Patent Licensing Royalties McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
25
2014
Corresponding Structure (Patents) Required to Avoid Indefiniteness McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
25
2014
U.S.-Centered Negotiations for Product Made and Sold Outside United States Do Not Constitute Sale or Offer for Sale in United States McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
25
2014
Post-Alice Federal Circuit Finds Internet Advertising Method Not Patent Eligible McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
25
2014
Patent Co-Owners Are Necessary Parties to Infringement Suits, but Cannot Ordinarily Be Involuntarily Joined McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
25
2014
Ralph Lauren Succeeds In Opposing “Parody Trademark” Before EU Court Covington & Burling LLP
Nov
25
2014
Trade Secret Misappropriation: Tell Me Your Secret Before I Tell You Whether I Have It Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Nov
25
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – November 25, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
24
2014
ALJ Lord Amends Ground Rules to Permit Reply Briefs Mintz
Nov
24
2014
Versata Software, Inc. v. Callidus Software, Inc.: Guidance on Stays Pending Post-Issuance Proceedings Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
24
2014
Ford Motor Company v. Paice LLC & The Abell Foundation, Inc., Decision Denying Institution IPR2014-00852 Faegre Drinker
Nov
24
2014
Atlas Copco Airpower N.V. v. Kaesar Kompressoren AG, Decision Denying Institution IPR2014-00776 Faegre Drinker
Nov
24
2014
Hewlett-Packard Co. v. MPHJ Technology Investments, LLC, Final Written Decision IPR2013-00309 Faegre Drinker
Nov
24
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – November 24, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins