Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort ascending
Jul
11
2022
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Registers China Manned Space Logo Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
28
2012
Lilly Files Amicus Brief in Myriad Remand – With Friends Like This… Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
2
2018
A Vibration Dampener Fails Mayo/Alice Test in D. Delaware – Is the Decision as Shaky as it Seems? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
17
2022
Mirati Therapeutics Sues China’s InventisBio for 99 Million RMB in Trade Secret Theft Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
20
2022
Shanghai Third Intermediate Court Affirms 5-Year Prison Sentence for Counterfeit Alpenliebe Candy in Criminal Trademark Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
30
2015
Shire v. Amneal Pharma – Adjusting the Rearview Mirror Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
30
2018
Fed. Cir. Affirms Unclean Hands Defense in Gilead v. Merck Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
3
2023
Decathlon Wins Almost 3 Million RMB in Chinese Trade Dress Dispute for Store Design Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
9
2013
Supreme Court Denies Cert. in Sherley v. Sebelius Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
23
2023
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited (CATL) Scores 35.8 Million RMB Patent Infringement Victory Against CALB Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
22
2013
Supreme Court Hears “Replicant Soy Bean” Appeal Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
9
2013
NOVARTIS A.G. v. UOI – What is Novelty in Indian Courts? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
16
2018
UCB, Inc. v. Accord Healthcare, Inc. – Can a Racemic Mixture be a “Lead Compound.” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
22
2023
Supreme Court Voids Amgen’s Patents using “Undue Experimentation” Standard Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
25
2013
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Inter Partes Review (IPR) Petition Joinder Practice Gains Momentum Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
28
2023
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Releases “Guidelines for the Determination of Abnormal Patent Applications and the Handling of Matters after the Determination” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
1
2023
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Releases Guidelines for Delayed Examination of Invention Patent Applications Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
1
2013
WildTangent Files its Supreme Court Certiorari Petition in Patent Infringement Case – Part 1 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
18
2013
Another Software Patent Horror Story Unmasked and Debunked: This One You Won’t Believe Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
2
2023
China’s Supreme People’s Court Adjusts Jurisdiction of their IP Tribunal Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
9
2023
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Releases Guidelines on Subject Matter Eligibility of Utility Model Patents Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
2
2013
Novozymes Looses “Possession” Of Its Enzyme Re: Patent Litigation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
10
2023
China Releases Second Batch of Warning Cases in ‘Blue Sky’ Special Rectification Program of the Patent Agent Industry Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
11
2016
The Biggest Technology Give-Away in History? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
26
2016
Myriad vs. Mayo – Detection vs. Processing at the Federal Circuit Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
27
2024
China’s Supreme People’s Court Clarifies Conditions Needed to Prove Patent Infringement Lawsuit Filed in Bad Faith Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
10
2014
CLS v. Alice Bank And The Cult Of The “Abstract Idea” Re: Patent Litigation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
21
2019
Why a Machine Readable Computer Instruction is not Abstract Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
7
2014
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Patent Eligibility Guidelines – A Step Too Far For Natural Products? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
10
2019
Solicitor General Signals Supreme Court to Address the Confusion Caused by the Abstract Idea Exception to 101 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
27
2014
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) s.101 Guidelines – How to “Eviscerate Patent Law” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
1
2014
Supreme Court Oral Arguments – Can Alice Get Out Of “Wonderland”? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
16
2014
USPTO Forum to Discuss the Guidance on Subject Matter Eligibility of Claims Reciting Laws of Nature - U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
13
2024
China’s State Administration for Market Regulation Releases Interim Provisions on Anti-Unfair Competition on the Internet Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
25
2020
Chinese Patent Filings Show Uptick in January 2020 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins