Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Feb
24
2022
Series: Economic Espionage and Theft of Trade Secrets Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Aug
23
2022
Series: How to Respond to the Threat of Trade Secret Loss Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Oct
28
2021
Server Test Showdown? The Conflicting Rulings Over Whether Embedding a Social Media Post Violates the Copyright Act Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Oct
4
2012
Service Mark Cancelled Because Services Listed in the Registration Were Not “Good in Trade” McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
17
2015
Servicenow Inc. v. Bmc Software, Inc.: Institution Denied Because No Claim Directed To Financial Product or Service CBM2015-00107 Faegre Drinker
Jan
8
2016
ServiceNow v. BMC Softward: Authorization Denied to File Motion to Submit Supplemental Information IPR2015-01176; -01211 Faegre Drinker
Dec
31
2015
ServiceNow, Inc. v. BMC Software, Inc.: Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review Faegre Drinker
Oct
14
2015
ServiceNow, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard, Co., Patent Claims Not Eligible for CBM Review CBM2015-00108 Faegre Drinker
Jul
27
2023
Serving a Perfect 10: No Protection for Embedding McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
1
2021
Set Phase to Subject Matter Ineligible: More Accurate Haplotype Phase Method Still Abstract McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
14
2013
Setback for Apple in iPhone Multi-District Litigation (MDL) Mintz
Jan
22
2021
Setting the Stage: Court Sets Oral Argument in Arthrex Cases Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
1
2017
Setting Up the Scope of IPR Estoppel for the Federal Circuit K&L Gates
Dec
25
2015
Settle with All Stakeholders Before Trying to Terminate an IPR: Qualcomm Inc. v. Bandspeed, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
1
2015
Settlement Agreement Precludes Consideration of Order Criticizing Attorney Conduct McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
28
2014
Settlement and Termination in IPR Proceedings: What You Need to Know [VIDEO] Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
12
2014
Settlement Does Not Guarantee Termination of IPR (Inter Partes Review) Proceedings Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jul
27
2017
Settling the Hawkwind Trademark Flap: Dave Brock v. Nik Turner McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
4
2014
Seven Key Takeaways from ICANN 51 in Los Angeles Katten
Nov
2
2016
Seven Strategies for Speedy Service Mark (and Trademark) Registration Faegre Drinker
Jun
5
2020
Seven Tips for IP Portfolio Management in Turbulent Times Godfrey & Kahn S.C.
Dec
1
2014
Seventh Circuit Cites Petrella to Save Copyright Suit from Dismissal McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
8
2014
Seventh Circuit Confirms "Image Advertising" is Commercial Speech ArentFox Schiff LLP
Jun
20
2017
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals' Decision Reins in Copyright Infringement Claims Relating to Home Designs von Briesen & Roper, s.c.
Nov
16
2016
Seventh Circuit Finds General Description of Trade Secret Sufficient to Satisfy Pleading Standard under Defend Trade Secrets Act Mintz
Dec
26
2019
Seventh Circuit Formally Adopts Octane Fitness Standard for Trademark Cases McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
26
2018
Seventh Circuit Hands the Ball to State Supreme Court McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
14
2014
Seventh Circuit Rules on Trade Mark Abandonment Katten
Oct
25
2019
Seventh Circuit Snapshots Hole in Groupon’s Notice of Removal of Instagram User Suit Carlton Fields
Oct
29
2015
Several Hedge Fund-linked IPR Petitions Instituted: PTAB Finds No Abuse of Process Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
29
2022
Sexy Little Claims: Declaratory Judgments in Trademark Infringement Claims Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Aug
20
2021
SEYIDOGLU: Even “Incontestable” Trademark Registrations Are Vulnerable to Cancellation Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Dec
5
2018
Shades of Gray: Color Marks Can Never Be Inherently Distinctive Stark & Stark
Apr
6
2020
Shades of Green: TTAB Allows Registration of Color Mark Stark & Stark
Aug
12
2014
Sham Hatch-Waxman Infringement Suits And FDA Citizen Petitions; A Potential For New Liability For Innovators? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
1
2014
Sham-Wow! Antitrust Liability May Attach to Sham Administrative Petitions: Tyco Healthcare Group LP v. Mutual Pharm. Co., Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
11
2022
Shanghai Administration for Market Supervision Announces Success in Iron Fist Campaign in Head & Shoulders, Pantene Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
25
2022
Shanghai Administration for Market Supervision Releases Typical Cases Including Counterfeit Nike and Champion Brand Children’s Clothing Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
23
2021
Shanghai Fines Chinese Patent Firm for Filing ‘Irregular’ Patent Applications Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
30
2020
Shanghai Higher People’s Court Upholds 6-Year Prison Term and 90 Million RMB Fine for Lego Chinese Copyright Infringer Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
15
2022
Shanghai Intellectual Property Court: Continued Trademark Infringement After Notice Can Lead to Punitive Damages Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
25
2022
Shanghai No. 3 Intermediate People’s Court Affirms Prison Sentence in 61 Million RMB Cartier Counterfeit Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
26
2020
Shanghai People’s Procuratorate Launches Criminal Prosecution of Lego Block Infringers Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
6
2020
Shanghai Police Announce Arrests in Hasbro Transformers Criminal Copyright Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
10
2022
Shanghai Pudong Court Issues Preliminary Injunction in Chinese World Cup Streaming Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
20
2022
Shanghai Third Intermediate Court Affirms 5-Year Prison Sentence for Counterfeit Alpenliebe Candy in Criminal Trademark Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
2
2020
Shanghai Third Intermediate Court Announces Sentencing of Criminal Lego Infringers Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
4
2023
Shanghai Third Intermediate People’s Court Affirms 3-Year Prison Sentence for Counterfeiting “Bordeaux” Collective Trademark Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
24
2024
Shanghai to Subsidize Construction of Standard Essential Patent Pools Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
3
2020
Shanghai Zhizhen Intelligent Network Technology Co., Ltd. Sues Apple for $1.4 Billion USD After Supreme People’s Court Affirms Validity of Patent Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins