Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
May
15
2023
No Non-Competes for Lawyers? Trade Secret Misappropriation Lawsuits against Big Law Lawyers and Firm Management on the Rise Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
4
2014
No Non-Organic Mushrooms Welcome Here! - Hokto Kinoko Co. and Hokuto Co., Ltd. v. Concord Farms, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
23
2023
No One Likes a Sore Winner: IPR Prevailing Party Can’t Appeal McDermott Will & Emery
May
9
2015
No One Told John Oliver About the America Invents Act: Last Week Tonight Stuck in 2012 Mintz
Feb
28
2019
No Parking: Source of Anticipating Disclosure Determines if it's "Of Another” McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
3
2014
No Patent; No Federal Jurisdiction McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
19
2020
No Patent? No Problem! The Federal Circuit Paves The Way For Non-Patent Owners To Sue Infringers Vedder Price
Dec
21
2018
No Penalty: Fantasy Football Does Not Violate Players’ Right of Publicity McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
25
2012
No Permanent Injunction if Plaintiff and Defendant Did Not Directly Compete; Ongoing Royalty to Be Applied Instead McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
29
2016
No Place Like Home: Supreme Court to Review Whether § 1400(b) Alone Governs Venue in Patent Infringement Actions McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
13
2020
No Pleading, No Problem: Court Denies Motion to Dismiss and Bifurcates Willful Infringement Determination, in Absence of Affirmative Willful Infringement Claim Mintz
Sep
29
2016
No Post-Trial “Bait-and-Switch” on Legal Theory in Trademark Infringement McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
1
2013
No Preliminary Injunction Over Commercial Hopping McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
2
2015
No Presumption, but Inference of Irreparable Harm Permissible Under Lanham Act McDermott Will & Emery
May
5
2013
No Prior Conception Where Contemporaneous Disclosures Failed to Show Knowledge of Complete and Operative Method of Making Invention McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
3
2020
No Refunds: Cancellation of Patent Claims in IPR Isn’t a Taking McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
19
2015
No Rehearing Of Biosimilar Patent Dance Decision Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
27
2016
No Rehearing on Dual Use PTAB Panels McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
26
2018
No Rehearing on Inequitable Conduct McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
29
2018
No Rehearing on No Copyrights for Digital Remasters McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
9
2020
No Remix: Copyright Act Preempts Right of Publicity Claim McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
2
2015
No Review of PTAB Determination to Not Institute an IPR, Again McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
30
2017
No Right to a Jury for Award of Attorneys’ Fees McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
30
2017
No Right to Discovery of Unidentified Patents During BPCIA Litigation McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
28
2018
No Safe Harbor Shelter for ISP, but No $25 Million Payout Either McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
22
2022
No Second Bite at the Apple: Dismissal under Duplicative-Litigation Doctrine McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
15
2021
No Second Bite at the Apple: Injury Must Be Imminent and, Non-Speculative to Support Standing McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
22
2017
No Second Chances for Promega Damages Claim McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
28
2016
No Second Life for Fetal Test McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
2
2019
No Shelter for Willful Infringement of Distributor’s Trademarks McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
3
2022
No Similarity Between Water and Alcoholic Beverages in the European Union McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
6
2023
No Smoking Gun Here: Soliciting Input Sufficient to Satisfy Commission’s Statutory Obligation McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2023
No Snipe Hunting: AIA Adherence Means No Interference (Proceedings) McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
23
2014
No Sovereign Immunity: Targeting University Patents in Inter Partes Review Armstrong Teasdale
Apr
27
2023
No Spark Here: TTAB Refuses to Register Similar Mark for Real Estate Services McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins