Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Aug
29
2022
Supreme People’s Court Upholds China’s First Patent Linkage Ruling – Decision Released Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
3
2015
Another Claim Bites the Dust left by Teva v. Sandoz Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
16
2012
Bard v. Gore: Joint Inventors or Just One? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
17
2022
Mast-Jägermeister SE Wins 10 Million RMB at Beijing IP Court for Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
20
2013
USPTO Publishes Final Rules for Micro-Entity Status and Fee Schedule Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
22
2013
Is Software Different than other Technologies? Yes and No Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
6
2023
China’s Supreme People’s Court Releases “Summary of Judgments of the Intellectual Property Tribunal of the Supreme People’s Court (2022)” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
9
2013
NOVARTIS A.G. v. UOI – What is Novelty in Indian Courts? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
25
2013
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Inter Partes Review (IPR) Petition Joinder Practice Gains Momentum Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
24
2018
“Big Data” Claims Meet Mayo/Alice Rule Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
1
2013
WildTangent Files its Supreme Court Certiorari Petition in Patent Infringement Case – Part 1 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
18
2019
Split Federal Circuit Panel Holds That Method of Medical Treatment Claims are Patent Eligible Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
18
2013
Another Software Patent Horror Story Unmasked and Debunked: This One You Won’t Believe Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
2
2013
Novozymes Looses “Possession” Of Its Enzyme Re: Patent Litigation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
7
2023
The Tyranny of Large Numbers: Their Grip on s. 102 Inquiries Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
7
2019
Athena III – Should the Discovery of a Naturally-Occurring Correlation Encompass Recognition of its Practical Utility? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
6
2023
China’s National People’s Congress Releases Translation of Criminal Law Including IP Provisions Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
11
2016
The Biggest Technology Give-Away in History? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
26
2016
Myriad vs. Mayo – Detection vs. Processing at the Federal Circuit Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
10
2014
CLS v. Alice Bank And The Cult Of The “Abstract Idea” Re: Patent Litigation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
15
2024
China’s Supreme People’s Court Sets Low FRAND Rate in Another OPPO Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
19
2024
Huawei U.S. Patent Grants Drop 24% in 2023; BOE Drops Out of the Top 10 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
27
2019
Nalproprion v. Actavis: WDR met by Substantially Equivalent Claim Elements(?) Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
7
2014
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Patent Eligibility Guidelines – A Step Too Far For Natural Products? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
20
2024
Chinese Copyright Registrations Up 40% in 2023 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
27
2014
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) s.101 Guidelines – How to “Eviscerate Patent Law” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
1
2014
Supreme Court Oral Arguments – Can Alice Get Out Of “Wonderland”? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
16
2014
USPTO Forum to Discuss the Guidance on Subject Matter Eligibility of Claims Reciting Laws of Nature - U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
15
2024
France’s Arkema S.A. Sues Shanghai Huayi Group Co., Ltd. for 430 Million RMB Patent Infringement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
16
2020
Trump Signs Economic and Trade Agreement with China Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
2
2014
Splitting a KSR Hair - K/S HIMPP v. Hear-Ware Technologies, LLC Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
26
2014
Drafting Software Patent Applications to Meet Section 101 after the Alice Decision Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
22
2020
China’s Supreme People’s Court Releases Top 10 Intellectual Property Cases for 2019 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
14
2020
Netac Wins Patent Infringement Case Against Micron for USB Drives Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
18
2014
Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. v. RPost Communications Ltd. – PTAB Finds Electronic Messaging a “Technological Invention” Outside Ambit of Covered Business Method Review Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins