Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Aug
1
2017
Sports Bras and Tires - What Do They Have In Common? Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
23
2022
Sports in the Metaverse: Key Considerations ArentFox Schiff LLP
May
10
2016
Spotify, NMPA Accused of Concerted Effort to Taint Class Pool Proskauer Rose LLP
May
31
2016
Spotlight on the Highlights - Clarifications and Changes in the April 2016 TMEP - Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
26
2021
Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments - March 2021 Finnegan
Nov
1
2021
Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments - November 2021 Finnegan
Apr
1
2021
Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – April 2021 Finnegan
Aug
2
2021
Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – August 2021 Finnegan
Dec
8
2021
Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – December 2021 Finnegan
Feb
9
2022
Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – February 2022 Finnegan
Jul
6
2021
Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – July 2021 Finnegan
May
27
2021
Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – June 2021 Finnegan
Apr
26
2021
Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – May 2021 Finnegan
Sep
30
2021
Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – October 2021 Finnegan
Aug
25
2021
Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – September 2021 Finnegan
Nov
18
2019
Spreading The Influence: FTC Issues New Guidance for Influencers Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
14
2015
Square Inc v. J. Carl Cooper: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00158 Faegre Drinker
Jul
31
2015
Square Inc. v. Protegrity Corp. - What Constitutes a Covered Business Method Patent? McDermott Will & Emery
May
19
2015
Square v. J. Carl Cooper: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00157 Faegre Drinker
Apr
14
2016
Square v. Protegrity Corp: CBM2014-00182 Challenged Claims Unpatentable Faegre Drinker
May
1
2015
Square v. Protegrity Corp: Decision on Institution CBM2014-00182 Faegre Drinker
Jul
21
2015
Square v. REM Holdings 3: Final Written Decision Finding Claims Unpatentable as Obvious Over Evidence of Copying Faegre Drinker
Dec
30
2015
Square v. REM Holdings 3: Partially Granted Request For Rehearing Of Final Written Decision IPR2014-00312 Faegre Drinker
Jul
13
2015
SQUARE v. THINK COMPUTER CORP: PTAB Used Discretion to Deny CBM For Submitting Redundant Grounds CBM2015-00067 Faegre Drinker
Dec
11
2015
Square v. Unwired Planet: Final Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-01165 Faegre Drinker
Jan
8
2016
Square v. Unwired Planet: Final Written Decision Finding Challenged Claims Eligible for CBM Review and Unpatentable Under Section 101 CBM2014-00156 Faegre Drinker
Nov
30
2015
Square v. Unwired Planet: Final Written Decision holding that Board’s Authority not limited to Grounds Alleged in Petition IPR2014-01164 Faegre Drinker
Jun
10
2014
Square, Inc. v. J. Carl Cooper, Order Denying Authorization to Oppose Request for Rehearing IPR2014-00156 Faegre Drinker
Jun
9
2014
Square, Inc. v. J. Carl Cooper: Order Denying Request for Rehearing of Institution of Inter Partes Review Faegre Drinker
Jun
26
2014
Square, Inc. v. J. Carl Cooper: Order Regarding Claim Construction Standard Faegre Drinker
Feb
13
2015
Square, Inc. v. Protegrity Corporation: Order on Request to Expunge Evidence or Argument CBM2014-00182 Faegre Drinker
Sep
19
2014
Square, Inc. v. REM Holdings 3, LLC, Denying Motion for Leave to File Motion for Additional Discovery Faegre Drinker
Dec
15
2014
Square, Inc. v. REM Holdings 3, LLC, IPR2014-00312: Order Regarding Deposition IPR2014-00312 Faegre Drinker
Jul
20
2015
Square, Inc. v. Think Computer Corporation, Decision Authorizing Motion for Sanctions Based on Ex Parte Communication CBM2014-00159 Faegre Drinker
Mar
16
2015
Square, Inc. v. Unwired Planet, LLC: Denying Request for Rehearing CBM2014-00156 Faegre Drinker
Apr
16
2019
St. Regis Mohawk Tribe Petition for Centiorari Denied K&L Gates
Apr
30
2020
Staggering Amount of Spoliation Leads to Quick Conclusion of Trade Secrets Lawsuit Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Oct
6
2022
Standard Computer Equipment Can Support Inventive Concept under Alice Step 2 McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
27
2020
Standard Essential Patent Licensing Practices Do Not Violate Antitrust Laws McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
20
2020
Standard Essentiality Is a Question for the Fact Finder McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2017
Standard for Claim Indefiniteness Virtually Relaxes: One-E-Way v. Sony McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2017
Standard for Inventorship: Five Things Academic Scientists Should Know When Pursuing Their First Patent – Part II of V Mintz
Aug
29
2014
Standard Innovation Corporation v. Lelo, Inc., Granting Motion for Leave to File Motion for Extension of Time: IPR2014-00148 Faegre Drinker
Sep
19
2014
Standard Innovation Corporation v. Lelo, Inc.: Granting Motion to Deem Response Timely Filed IPR2014-00148 Faegre Drinker
Apr
30
2015
Standard Innovation v. Lelo: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00148 Faegre Drinker
Sep
28
2023
Standard Practice: The Public Has Right to Copyrighted Material Incorporated Into Law McDermott Will & Emery
May
30
2014
Standards and Injunctions Under EU Competition Law McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
4
2021
Standing Challenge Brews Trouble in Trademark Dispute McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
1
2015
Standing Conferred Only to a Privy of the Petitioner McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2015
Standing for CBM Proceeding Only Necessary at Time of the Petition McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins