Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Jun
21
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – June 21, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
21
2016
Lessons For Persuading the Patent Board: Straight From Judges’ Mouths Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
21
2016
Supreme Court Confirms PTAB Claims Construction Rules: Standard Remains the Same Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
21
2016
Supreme Court Defers Certiorari Decision In Amgen Sandoz Biosimilar Patent Dance Dispute Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
20
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – June 20, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
20
2016
Federal Circuit Affirms Refusal to Register “Churrascos” Based on Genericness, Despite Prior Federal Registration of the Mark Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
20
2016
Ubisoft, Inc. v. Uniloc USA, Inc. Denying Joinder With Terminated Proceeding and Denying Institution Faegre Drinker
Jun
19
2016
WesternGeco, L.L.C. v. PGS Geophysical AS, Final Written Decision Finding Certain of the Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2015-00309 Faegre Drinker
Jun
17
2016
Supreme Court Loosens Standard for Willful Infringement/Enhanced Damages Polsinelli PC
Jun
17
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – June 17, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
17
2016
Supreme Court Clarifies Standards Governing the Attorneys’ Fees Awards In Copyright Litigation Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
17
2016
Band Led Zeppelin Says Song Chords Too Common to Copyright IMS Legal Strategies
Jun
16
2016
Patent Prosecution: “Unclean Hands” Doctrine Erases Merck’s Damage Award Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
16
2016
Securus Tech v. Global Tel*Link Corp: Petition for Inter Partes Review Denied IPR2016-00267 Faegre Drinker
Jun
16
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – June 16, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
16
2016
PTAB’S First Post-Grant Review Decisions Invalidates Livestock Patents Under Alice Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
16
2016
Four Big Questions to Help You Understand the Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
16
2016
Delay in Bringing Suit Is No Bar to Copyright Infringement Claims Stark & Stark
Jun
16
2016
Federal Circuit Emphasizes Reason In Application Of Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
16
2016
US Supreme Court Adds to District Court's Ability to Award Enhanced Patent Damages Katten
Jun
15
2016
California Federal Court Grants TRO Under New Federal Trade Secrets Law Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jun
15
2016
Patent Infringement: Amendment Moots Motions for Both Parties without Specific Adoption of Prior Filings Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jun
15
2016
Overview of United States Trade Representative’s 2016 Special 301 Report on State of IPR in Venezuela Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
15
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – June 15, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
15
2016
Supreme Court Makes It Harder for Willful Infringers to Escape Punishment Mintz
Jun
14
2016
SCOTUS Paves the Way for Enhanced Damages with Halo Ruling Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
14
2016
Supreme Court Relaxes Standard for Enhancing Patent Damages in Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc. Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
14
2016
Supreme Court Lowers the Standard for Obtaining Enhanced Damages for Patent Infringement Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Jun
14
2016
Supreme Court Changes Standard to Obtain Enhanced Damages for Patent Infringement Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
14
2016
Supreme Court Ruling Gives District Courts Increased Flexibility to Award Enhanced Damages in Patent Litigation Vedder Price
Jun
14
2016
Give Your Brand Some Love - Use or Lose Your Trademark Faegre Drinker
Jun
14
2016
Modest Patent Portfolios: IP for Start-Ups, Part II [VIDEO] Mintz
Jun
14
2016
CoreLogic v. Boundary Solutions: Disclaimed Claims Will Not Be Considered In Eligibility of Business Method Review CBM2016-00016 Faegre Drinker
Jun
14
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – June 14, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
14
2016
Supreme Court’s Stryker/Halo Decision Makes it Easier for Courts to Award Enhanced Damages In Patent Infringement Cases Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins