Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort ascending Organization
Jan
2
2012
ITC Issues General Exclusion Order Based on Respondents’ “Willful Blindness” and Potential to Evade Order McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
5
2017
ITC Issues First Exclusion Order on SEPs and Upcoming Opinion Expected To Provide Important Guidance on FRAND and SEPs Mintz
Apr
5
2019
ITC Investigates JinkoSolar, LONGi Solar and REC Group for Patent Infringement Foley & Lardner LLP
May
13
2021
ITC Initiates Pilot Program to Allow ALJs to Issue Interim Initial Determinations Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Sep
8
2016
ITC Grants Exclusion Order Modification to Include Components Imported for Assembling the Infringing Device Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jan
13
2021
ITC Finishes 2020 with a Flurry of New Complaints Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Aug
16
2018
ITC Doubles Down On Its Interpretation Of Section 337’s Domestic Industry Requirement Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
11
2016
ITC Designates Newly-Instituted Section 337 Investigation For Fast-Track Hearing On Section 101 Issues Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jul
28
2017
ITC Denies Suspension or Temporary Rescission of Remedial Orders after PTAB Invalidates Patents at Issue Mintz
Nov
1
2016
ITC Denies Motion to Stay Enforcement of Modified Exclusion Order Covering Components Imported For Assembling Infringing Device Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Nov
17
2022
ITC Denies Competing Motions for Sanctions For Failure to Comply with the Rules Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Aug
1
2016
ITC Declines To Reach Question Of Whether Laches Is An Available Defense In Section 337 Investigations Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Sep
1
2016
ITC Declines to File Petition for Certiorari – CAFC Holding ITC Does Not Have Jurisdiction over Digital Imports Stands Mintz
May
21
2019
ITC ALJ McNamara in Apple-Qualcomm Investigation: Exclusion Orders Are Incentives to Design-Around Mintz
May
24
2016
ITC Affirms Summary Determinations of Patent Invalidity Based on Indefiniteness in Wireless Headsets and Automated Teller Machines Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
13
2016
ITC Adopts Summary Determination of Section 101 Invalidity In Tracking Devices and Finds Asserted Patent Claims Invalid Under Section 112 In Brewing Capsules Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
4
2014
ITC (International Trade Commission) Says the Importation of Digital Data Can Constitute Importation of a Patent-Infringing Product Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
16
2010
ITAR License Exemption Amended To Allow Hand-Carrying Of Technical Data Outside The United States Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
20
2017
Italy Ratifies Unified Patent Court Agreement, Introduces Provisions Against Indirect Counterfeiting K&L Gates
Jun
27
2011
Italian patent data now in EPO database McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
1
2016
Italian Patent Box and Its (Non-) Compliance with OECD Recommendations McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2019
Italian Film Composer “Scores” for Authors Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
24
2011
Italian Competition Authority Finds Abusive Conduct in Withholding Data and Internal Communications Praising Company Strategy McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
26
2010
It's Not Over For MGA's Bratz Doll Line Yet Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
16
2020
It Takes Two to Tango: The German Federal Supreme Court Acknowledges that Infringer Hold-Out Is a Real Problem Mintz
Jan
31
2024
It Takes Two to Tango: Gilstrap Frames Implementer Holdout as Bad Faith Justifying “Suspension” of SEP Licensing Discussions Mintz
May
9
2024
It May Be a Hairy Situation, but Detailed Declaration Sufficient Evidence of Prior Use McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
1
2014
It Is “Quite Clear” that USPTO’s Decision Not To Institute an IPR Is “Final and Nonappealable” McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
28
2016
It Ends Not with a Bang but a Whimper in Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
28
2015
IT Contracts – Julie Korostoff, Co-chair, IT Transactions & Outsourcing Practice [VIDEO] Mintz
Sep
22
2022
It Can Take Three Appeals to Make a Claim Construction Go “Right”—or Three Bites by Apple McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
23
2015
It Can Happen: PTAB Alters Final Written Decision on Rehearing McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
15
2015
It Can Be A Tough Road For Trade Secrets Plaintiffs In The North Carolina Business Court Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, LLP
May
1
2012
Issues from an Initial Determination that Are “Noticed” but Not Reviewed by the ITC May Be Appealed to the Federal Circuit McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
4
2021
Issue Preclusion Can Apply to Prior Inter Partes Reexamination Determinations Finnegan
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins