Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Jul
23
2020
Patent Marking: The Proper Method to Display Protection Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
14
2013
Patent Mediation [VIDEO] Mintz
Jul
15
2016
Patent Office Adds Another After Final Option for Applicants – P3 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
12
2014
Patent Office Board Clarifies Petitioner Role for Single Petition by Several Companies Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
19
2013
Patent Office Board Takes a Bite out of Apple’s IPR (inter partes review) Challenge of VirnetX Patents Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
18
2011
Patent Office Broadens “First Action Interview” Pilot Program Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
21
2012
Patent Office Finalizes Rules on Preissuance Submissions by Third Parties Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
May
26
2010
Patent Office Jumps into Social Media with Both Feet Bracewell LLP
May
11
2010
Patent Office Ombudsman to the Rescue! Bracewell LLP
Jul
26
2011
Patent Office Proposes New Materiality Rules Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
30
2015
Patent Office Publishes Subject Matter “Update” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
31
2013
Patent Office Reexamination Nullifies District Court Damages Award: Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter International, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
4
2016
Patent Office Releases Comments on Standards for Patent Eligibility Examination Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
29
2014
Patent Owner Bears Burden of Proving Proposed Claims Patentable McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
28
2014
Patent Owner Cannot Assert a Claim That Is Missing a Material Limitation McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
1
2017
Patent Owner Extinguishes IPR by Amending Claims McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
1
2021
Patent Owner Loses Everything at PTAB Finnegan
Jul
28
2017
Patent Owner Must Be Subject to Personal Jurisdiction for Declaratory Judgment McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
3
2015
Patent Owner Must Distinguish Universe of All Known Prior Art to Substitute a New Claim McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
1
2014
Patent Owner Must Prove Patentability of Proposed Amended Claims (Including Prior Art Date) McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2017
Patent Owner Must Receive Notice of References Against Each Challenged Claim McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2014
Patent Owner Practicing the Patent Not Necessary to Secure Preliminary Injunction McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
31
2011
Patent Owner Reexamination Requests with Parallel Litigation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
23
2015
Patent Owner Should Have Left “Good Enough” Alone McDermott Will & Emery
May
25
2011
Patent Owner Stay Motion Successful Based on Defendants’ Reexam Requests Filed on Eve of Markman Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
8
2021
Patent Owner Tip #1 For Surviving An Instituted IPR: Approach IPR Depositions Like A Cross-Examination Mintz
Jun
24
2021
Patent Owner Tip #10 for Surviving an Instituted IPR: Address Claim Construction and Public Availability Mintz
Jul
1
2021
Patent Owner Tip #11 for Surviving an Instituted IPR: Use It or Lose It (in the POR) Mintz
Jul
29
2021
Patent Owner Tip #12 for Surviving an Instituted IPR: Address Individual Claims – Dependent Claims Can Save the Day Mintz
Aug
6
2021
Patent Owner Tip #13 for Surviving an Instituted IPR: When to Amend Claims in an IPR Mintz
Aug
12
2021
Patent Owner Tip #14 for Surviving an Instituted IPR: When Not to Amend Claims in an IPR Mintz
Aug
19
2021
Patent Owner Tip #15 for Surviving an Instituted IPR: Procedure for Motions to Amend Mintz
Aug
26
2021
Patent Owner Tip #16 for Surviving an Instituted IPR: Improve Your Chances of Getting Amendments Mintz
Sep
2
2021
Patent Owner Tip #17 for Surviving an Instituted IPR: Alternatives to Motions to Amend in IPR Proceedings Mintz
Sep
23
2021
Patent Owner Tip #18 for Surviving an Instituted IPR: Defending Depositions Mintz
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins