Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort ascending Organization
Aug
13
2014
Iron Dome LLC v. Chinook Licensing DE LLC: Order Expunging Preliminary Response IPR2014-00674 Faegre Drinker
Oct
20
2014
Iron Dome LLC v. Chinook Licensing DE LLC: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00674 Faegre Drinker
Sep
16
2014
Iron Dome LLC v. Chinook Licensing DE LLC: Denying Authorization to File a Motion for Sanctions IPR2014-00674 Faegre Drinker
Oct
27
2016
Iqbal/Twombly Pleading Standard Governs Joint Patent Infringement Claims McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
3
2013
Iqbal and Twombly Notwithstanding: Form 18 Is the Standard for Pleading Direct Patent Infringement Allegations McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
15
2016
IPRs And Settlement of Patent Infringement Cases Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
30
2021
IPR, CBM, and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in June and July 2021 Finnegan
Nov
24
2021
IPR, CBM, and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in August, September, and October 2021 Finnegan
Jul
9
2021
IPR, CBM, and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in April and May 2021 Finnegan
Jan
29
2016
IPR Survives Despite Petitioner Failure to Name All Real Parties of Interest McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
28
2016
IPR Stay Factors and Explaining Preliminary Injunction Rationale McDermott Will & Emery
May
31
2016
IPR Proactive Defense Measures – Strategies And Considerations For Patent Owners Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
30
2015
IPR Privity Analysis Includes Post-Complaint Period McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2015
IPR Petition Denied where Challenger Failed to Prove Operating Manual was “Printed Publication” Armstrong Teasdale
Feb
10
2022
IPR Petition Cannot Be Based on Applicant Admitted Prior Art McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
29
2016
IPR One-Year Time Bar Does Not Apply to Government Contractor McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
9
2021
IPR on Written Description? Claims Found Unpatentable Based on Lack of Entitlement to Priority Date McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
31
2019
IPR of Pre-AIA Patent Not an Unconstitutional Taking K&L Gates
May
7
2022
IPR Jeopardy: Estoppel Pitfalls for Multiple Concurrently Filed Petitions Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
22
2020
IPR Institution Requires Reasonable Likelihood that Reference Is Printed Publication McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
13
2020
IPR Institution Limited By the Petition, But Not Limited as to the Express Teachings of the Prior Art McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2016
IPR Institution Decisions Not Appealable, Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Remains Standard McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
2
2015
IPR Institution Can Be Denied Based on Petition Length or Failure to Identify Related Matters Armstrong Teasdale
Sep
1
2022
IPR Estoppel Applies to Claim Not Addressed During Pre-SAS Proceeding McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
3
2014
IPR Clock Runs Until Allegations Are Nullified McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
17
2020
IPR and Fast-Moving District Court Litigation: PTAB Formalizes the Analysis for Balancing Efficiency and Fairness Mintz
Mar
2
2021
IPR and CBM Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in October and November 2020 Finnegan
May
7
2021
IPR and CBM Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in February and March 2021 Finnegan
Mar
10
2021
IPR and CBM Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in December 2020 and January 2021 Finnegan
Oct
20
2014
IPR (Inter Partes Review) Challenge to Pharmaceutical Compound Patent Denied Armstrong Teasdale
May
18
2017
IPO, AIPLA and ABA IP Section Propose Legislative Fixes for Section 101 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
5
2012
IP: Phase 2 implementation of the America Invents Act provides new “patent attack” tools Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Oct
8
2012
IP: A boon for patent trolls Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Jul
20
2021
IP Waiver for COVID-19 Vaccines: What the United States’ Support Means in Practice Proskauer Rose LLP
Feb
26
2024
IP Tribunal of the Supreme People’s Court Releases Top 10 Influential Cases at 5-Year Anniversary of Founding Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins