Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort ascending Organization
Dec
5
2014
Inventor Testimony in Patent Litigation IMS Legal Strategies
May
3
2021
Inventor Assignments – Problems on the Horizon Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Apr
22
2021
Inventions Not Made Under Employment Agreement McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
23
2018
Invention Assignment Agreements – How to Avoid Pitfalls Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
6
2019
Invasion of the Copyright Trolls: What to Do If You Have Been Sued by Strike 3 Holdings or Malibu Media over Alleged BitTorrent Downloads Stark & Stark
Oct
6
2021
Invalidity of Terminal Patents Not Tied to Disclaimed Patent-in-Suit’s Expiration Mintz
Oct
23
2018
Invalidity Of Copaxone Patents Supported By Statements To FDA Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
11
2015
Invalidity Argument Without a Home? PTAB's Discretion to Ignore Grounds for Invalidity Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
27
2014
Invalidating Means Plus Function Claim Requires Expert Testimony -- Elcommerce.com, Inc. v. SAP AG, et. al McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
29
2015
Invalidating a Patent on a Motion to Dismiss Is Proper: Content Extraction and Transmission LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
28
2013
Invalidating a Copyright Registration? Not So Fast McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
12
2017
Invalidated patents being burned in protest – a new milestone in recent American history. Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
13
2016
Int’l Business Machines Corp. v. Intellectual Ventures I: Denying Institution where Petition Found to be Based on Mere Probability or Possibility in Prior Art Reference IPR2015-01543 Faegre Drinker
May
14
2021
Introduction of a Patent Box K&L Gates
Jun
30
2016
Intrinsic Feature in All Described Embodiments Makes Patent Claim Insurmountable McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
25
2021
Intrinsic Evidence Seals the Deal for Seabed Finnegan
Aug
31
2014
Intri-Plex Techs and MMI Holdings v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Rencol: Order on Motions to Seal and for Entry of Protective Order Faegre Drinker
Sep
10
2014
Intri-Plex Technologies. and MMI Holdings. v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Rencol: Denying Motion for Discovery IPR2014-00309 Faegre Drinker
Apr
1
2015
Intri-Plex Technologies, Inc. v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Rencol Ltd: Final Written Decision 20150323 Faegre Drinker
Oct
12
2015
Intri-Plex Technologies v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Rencol: Denying Motion to Expunge Information Regarding Manufacturing Practices and Customers IPR2014-00309 Faegre Drinker
Aug
30
2013
Intra-Corporate Trademark Transfers: Beware of the Intent-To-Use Trap Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Nov
30
2011
Intra-Circuit Split Continues as Federal Circuit Denies Rehearing En Banc McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
21
2012
Intervening Rights Limited to Text-Based Amendments McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
6
2011
Intervening Rights Can Apply to an Original Claim Based on Arguments Made During Reexamination McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
2
2015
Intervening Reissue Still Bound by Earlier Claim Construction - ArcelorMittal France v. AK Steel Corp. McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
23
2018
Interval Licensing v. AOL — Judge Plager’s Concurring Dissent Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
14
2023
Interoperability of Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Law Examined by Congress Proskauer Rose LLP
Nov
1
2015
Internet-Centric Solution Is More than Moving Online: eBay v. PAID McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
12
2020
Internet Service Provider (ISP) Cox Communications Found Liable to the Tune of $1 Billion For Allowing Users to Illegally Share Music Files on Peer-to-Peer Networks Stark & Stark
Mar
12
2020
Internet Sales Lead to Personal Jurisdiction Despite No Physical Presence McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
5
2010
Internet Merchants owe a Greater Duty of Care to their European Clients - Louis Vuitton v. eBay [France] in contrast see Tiffany v. eBay [NY, US] Vedder Price
Feb
7
2013
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Publishes Pricing for Trademark Clearinghouse Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Apr
7
2023
Internet Archive’s Unauthorized Lending of Copyrighted eBooks is Not Fair Use Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Aug
2
2013
Internet Advertising Method Found to Be Patent-Eligible... Again McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
14
2016
International Trademarks: Arctic Chill Remains in ICELAND Dispute Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins