Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Jan
4
2016
Washington Redskins Haven’t Won Yet: Why Constitutionality of Section 2(a) is Not Yet Final Mintz
Jan
4
2016
Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics: Final Written Decision Concluding Nexus Not Established IPR2014-01102 Faegre Drinker
Jan
4
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – January 4, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
4
2016
Cheaper EU Trade Marks Available from March 2016 Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jan
4
2016
Did PTAB Dose AIA Poison Pill Incorrectly Against Premium Genetics? Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
2
2016
FTC Releases Agenda for First-Ever PrivacyCon Covington & Burling LLP
Jan
1
2016
Arris Group and Cox Communications v. C-Cation Technologies: Order Expunging Supplemental Evidence Exhibits IPR2015-00635 Faegre Drinker
Jan
1
2016
K.J. Pretech Co., Ltd. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLC: Motion for Additional Discovery Authorized Faegre Drinker
Dec
31
2015
District Judge Finds Some Claims Precluded, Others Not – By A Degree Proskauer Rose LLP
Dec
31
2015
ServiceNow, Inc. v. BMC Software, Inc.: Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review Faegre Drinker
Dec
31
2015
Top Patent Law Stories In 2015 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
31
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 31, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
31
2015
Inguran, LLC d/b/a Sexing Technologies v. Premium Genetics (UK) Ltd: Institution of Post-Grant Review of a Patent Issuing from a Transition Application Faegre Drinker
Dec
31
2015
Hewlett-Packard Co. v. U.S. Philips Corp., et al.: Order Denying Authorization to File Reply to Preliminary Response Faegre Drinker
Dec
31
2015
Altaire Pharmaceuticals v. Paragon Bioteck: Decision Denying Institution In Part Where Petitioner Had Not Alleged Unpatentability With Sufficient Particularlity Faegre Drinker
Dec
30
2015
Contract Corner: Drafting to Protect Your IP Rights in Licensor’s Bankruptcy Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Dec
30
2015
Use of Priority Denial to Subject Apparent "Pre-AIA" Patents to PGR: Inguran v. Premium Genetics Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
30
2015
TTAB Finds MEAT CANDY to be Too Sweet Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
30
2015
Year End 2015 Update - gTLD Sunrise Periods Now Open Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
30
2015
Square v. REM Holdings 3: Partially Granted Request For Rehearing Of Final Written Decision IPR2014-00312 Faegre Drinker
Dec
29
2015
Review of 2015 Federal Circuit Decisions Addressing IPR Claim Construction and Procedural Issues Mintz
Dec
29
2015
Starbucks Corporation v. Ameranth: Instituting Review of Challenged Claims CBM2015-00091 Faegre Drinker
Dec
29
2015
Can the California Secretary Of State Reject Disparaging Business Entity Names? Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Dec
29
2015
Don't Blame Patents For High Drug Prices Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
28
2015
Five Tips for Retaining Employees in Competitive Business Climate Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
28
2015
Actifio v. Delphix Corp: Authorized To Cross-Examine After Declaration Was Filed Regardless Of Service Date IPR2015-00014 Faegre Drinker
Dec
28
2015
Wegner to Lee: Four-Step Program to Resolve Section 101 IP Questions Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
28
2015
Mangrove Partners Master Fund v. VIRNETX: Additional Discovery Regarding Real-Party-In-Interest Denied IPR2015-01046 Faegre Drinker
Dec
28
2015
Lowe's Home Centers v. Maureen Reddy: Authorization To File Motion For Late Submission of Supplemental Information After Oral Argument IPR2015-00306 Faegre Drinker
Dec
28
2015
MotionPoint Corp v. TransPerfect Global: Reply to Preliminary Response Authorized To Address Standing CBM2015-00168, 178 Faegre Drinker
Dec
25
2015
The USPTO’s Holiday Gift: Late Filings Allowed! Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Dec
25
2015
Massachusetts Court Clears Patent Prosecutors of Malpractice Claims Arising From Representation of Clients in Same Technology Area Proskauer Rose LLP
Dec
25
2015
Settle with All Stakeholders Before Trying to Terminate an IPR: Qualcomm Inc. v. Bandspeed, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
25
2015
Factual Inc. v. Locata LBS LLC: Granting Motion to Strike Objections for Being Untimely Faegre Drinker
Dec
24
2015
Federal Circuit Limits the Safe Harbor Provision and the Scope of § 271(g) McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins