Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
May
23
2017
Supreme Court Unanimously Changes Where Patents May Be Litigated Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
4
2021
Practice What You Preach: Trade Secret Rules (Of Course) Apply to Lawyers Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
10
2021
Waiver Of Intellectual Property Protections For COVID-19 Vaccine Unlikely To Have Meaningful Impact In Short Term Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
30
2021
Patent Protection on AI Inventions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
15
2021
Ninth Circuit Denies Sherman Act Challenge To No-Poach Provision Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
3
2011
Brands and Video Games: Three Steps for Finding a Perfect Match Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
3
2022
Healthcare Res. Mgmt. Grp., LLC v. Econatura All Healthy World, LLC – A Cautionary Tale: Meticulous or Careless Strategy Required to Prove Your Trade Secret Claim Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
12
2011
Patent Holder Takes a Shot at Nintendo over DSi Cameras Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
29
2022
California Labor Code Section 925: A Word of Caution for Out-of-State Employers of California Employees Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
14
2022
The Legit Ledger Episode 1: Intellectual Property Considerations for Licensing NFTs with Yasamin Parsafar and Jim Gatto [PODCAST] Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
15
2023
SEC Seeks To Update Privacy Act of 1974 Regulations Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
6
2023
FDA Clarifies Approach to Pediatric Drug Development Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
16
2015
Urock Network v. Umberto Sulpasso – Claim Preclusion Rocked Cancellation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
27
2023
Yita LLC v. MacNeil IP LLC 2022-1373, 2022-1374 (Fed. Cir. June 6, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
27
2023
HIP Inc. v. Hormel Foods Corp. No. 2022-1696, _ F.4th ___ (Fed. Cir. May 2, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
8
2019
Supreme Court Holds that a Copyright Claimant May Commence an Infringement Suit Only AFTER the Copyright Office Registers the Copyright Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
6
2023
Trinity Info Media, LLC, fka Trinity Intel Media, LLC, v. Covalent, Inc., No. 2022-1308 (Fed. Cir. July 14, 2023) (“Opinion”) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
3
2016
Federal Circuit Case Law Summary of High Point SARL v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., No. 15-1235 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 16, 2016) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
30
2016
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Institutes 17 Inter Partes Reviews for TCL Communication Technology Holdings Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
7
2019
Today’s Special: Validity Goulash – Serving Up 101 in the Mechanical Arts Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
25
2019
Blockchain Technology Continues to Support a Flourishing Music Industry Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
5
2016
Rah! Rah! Sis Boom Bah! Supreme Court to Decide Whether Copyright Act Protects Cheerleader Uniform Designs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
9
2016
Defend Trade Secrets Act – Coming to Federal Court Near You Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
5
2019
3 Steps in Furtherance of Avoiding Devastating Spoliation Sanctions in Trade Secret Misappropriation Litigation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
10
2024
M&A Transactions: Drafting AI Representations and Warranties for Non-AI Companies Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
3
2020
Intellectual Property Outlook: Cases and Trends to Follow in 2020 — PART 2 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
5
2020
IP Protection and the Open COVID Cure Chase Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
10
2014
Allegations that Defendants Provided Product for “Free” State Claims Under California’s Unfair Practices Act (UPA) and Unfair Competition Law (UCL), Notwithstanding that “Cost” of Product Was Recouped by Overcharging for Shipping Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
24
2014
Versata Software, Inc. v. Callidus Software, Inc.: Guidance on Stays Pending Post-Issuance Proceedings Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
29
2021
Is Lawful Possession of a Trade Secret Enough for Standing to Sue for Misappropriation? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
15
2021
Trade Secret Misappropriation: Denial of Motion for Attorneys’ Fees under CUTSA is Not an Appealable Order Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
16
2010
ITAR License Exemption Amended To Allow Hand-Carrying Of Technical Data Outside The United States Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
11
2011
Protecting Trade Secrets In A Post-WikiLeaks World Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
18
2015
There’s No Such Thing As a Free Sample Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
2
2022
Money Laundering and High-Value Art: Treasury’s Study Discusses Financial Crimes and NFTs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins