Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
May
8
2015
Weekly Data Privacy Alert – 4 May 2015 Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
8
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – May 8, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
8
2015
LevelUp’s Pursuit of Attorney’s Fees Goes Up to the Federal Circuit Level Proskauer Rose LLP
May
8
2015
Google v. Unwired Planet: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00036 Faegre Drinker
May
8
2015
FTC and DOJ: The PTO’s Efforts to Enhance Patent Quality Will Promote Competition, Innovation and Consumer Welfare Mintz
May
7
2015
Greene’s Energy Group v. Oil States Energy Services: Final Written Decision (Motion to Amend) IPR2014-00216 Faegre Drinker
May
7
2015
Opportunity for Equivalents in Claim Amendments Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
May
7
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – May 7, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
7
2015
Federal Circuit Grants Injunction Keeping Sandoz’s Biosimilar Version of Neupogen Off Market Until Appeal Decided Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
7
2015
Maximizing Use of the USPTO’s Patent Application Alert Service Mintz
May
7
2015
SkyHawke Technologies v. L&H Concepts: Denying Motion for Joinder IPR2014-01485 Faegre Drinker
May
6
2015
Beware Of Petitions And Claim Charts Having Conclusory Statements On The Teachings Of The Prior Art Armstrong Teasdale
May
6
2015
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. v. DataTreasury Corp., Final Written Decision CBM2014-00020 Faegre Drinker
May
6
2015
Foreign Corporations and the Long Arm of the Law Proskauer Rose LLP
May
6
2015
An Easier Way to Protect Your Designs Globally Armstrong Teasdale
May
6
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – May 6, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
6
2015
QSC Audio Products, Inc. v. Crest Audio, Inc., Final Written Decision IPR2014-00127 Faegre Drinker
May
6
2015
Federal Circuit Keeps Sandoz Biosimilar Off The Market For Now Foley & Lardner LLP
May
6
2015
Securus Technologies v. Global Tel*Link Corporation: Denying Institution IPR2015-00153 Faegre Drinker
May
6
2015
Neste Oil OYJ v. REG Synthetic Fuels: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00578 Faegre Drinker
May
5
2015
Second Circuit Explains (Again) Why Courts Should Not Interfere With Arbitration Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
5
2015
Keeping Up With Kyle Bass: Pharma Patents Post Foley & Lardner LLP
May
5
2015
Temporal Power v. Beacon Power: Denying Institution IPR2015-00147 Faegre Drinker
May
5
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – May 5, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
5
2015
Bipartisan Congressional Reforms Seek to Deter Abusive Patent Demand Letters Vedder Price
May
4
2015
A Scandalous Mark to Some, Free Speech to Others: Federal Circuit to Decide Whether Controversial Limit on Trademark Registrations Violates First Amendment Mintz
May
4
2015
Sharp Corp. v. Surpass Tech Innovation LLC, Decision Denying Institution IPR2015-00022 Faegre Drinker
May
4
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – May 4, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
4
2015
Are Your Patent Procurement Guidelines Outdated? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
3
2015
No Interlocutory Review of Pre-Institution Stay Motion’s in CBM Proceedings McDermott Will & Emery
May
3
2015
Anticipation Found Even Where the Prior Art Did Not Disclose Limitations Arranged the Same Way as in the Claim McDermott Will & Emery
May
2
2015
Use of “Antithesis” of Claim Element Does Not Bar Application of Doctrine of Equivalents McDermott Will & Emery
May
2
2015
Lost Profits Are Hard to Come By: Warsaw Orthopedic v. NuVasive Patent Litigation McDermott Will & Emery
May
2
2015
SCOTUS Opts Not To Remand Case Raising Preclusion Question Answered in B&B Hardware Proskauer Rose LLP
May
2
2015
Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement of a Disclaimed Patent Warranted in Hatch-Waxman McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins