Litigation / Trial Practice

Litigation actions brought in the United States at the federal and state levels, cases in front of the  US Supreme Court (SCOTUS), and cases litigated before the different courts that comprise the US Court of Special Jurisdiction are among the different stories, news, and litigation, visitors to the National Law Review will read about on the litigation trial practice area of law.

Special jurisdictions including Federal Circuits, the Court of Special Jurisdictions, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), US Tax Court, the Patent and Trademark Appeals Board (PTAB), and other agency-related litigation and trial news is analyzed by the legal experts at the National Law Review. Actions and litigation brought to these special courts, coverage of tax appeals, bankruptcy proceedings, and international litigation which arise in the United States, Canada, China, the United Kingdom, and the European Union are also covered by the National Law Review.

Business and commercial litigation, patent litigation including inter partes reviews (IPRs), class action lawsuits, government actions, multi-party and multi-jurisdiction litigation, communications, environmental law, products liability claims, and trust and estate litigation, are topics that are covered on the site. Visitors can also read about the latest litigation in product liability claims, insurance claims, intellectual property, mergers and acquisition litigation, real estate development, and white-collar criminal actions, which involve prominent C-level executives and highly paid board members, on the National Law Review. Whistleblower litigation and stories of employees reporting high-level executives are also highly covered on the site. The impact of court cases across a variety of legal areas is analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review.

Along with breaking down the court’s decisions and opinions, NLR also covers information related to the trial and appellate-level practice in the United States. Evidentiary rules and hearings, eDiscovery claims, tort reform lawsuits, disputes arising out of the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA), and other state and federal appeals are covered online by the National Law Review.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Oct
28
2011
OFAC, BIS Double Up Flow Serve: What the Flowserve Settlement Says About Corporate Compliance Programs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
23
2022
Los Angeles Superior Court Invalidates California Law Requiring Gender Diversity on Company Boards Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
12
2011
California Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument In Key Meal/Rest Period Case Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
22
2011
In Ninth Circuit, Whistleblowers Not Exempt From Confidentiality Agreements Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
25
2022
Supreme Court Discrimination Case Narrows Scope of Restitution for Individuals Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
5
2019
Ninth Circuit Holds That Statutes Do Not Constitute “Rules or Regulations of the SEC” for Purposes of Sarbanes-Oxley Act Whistleblower Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
16
2011
Cherchez les Catalogues Raisonné Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
30
2011
RIM Defeats Sherman Act Section 2 Claims At Pleading Stage Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
31
2012
The Ninth Circuit Applies the Brakes to Runaway Nationwide Class Actions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
25
2014
Everyone Gets To See The Evidence: The California Court Of Appeal Rejects an Attorneys’ Fee Award Based On The Trial Court’s In Camera Review Of Class Counsel’s Billing Records Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
29
2020
(Cheer)Leading By Example: UK’s Cheerleading Scandal and Lessons for Leaders Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
3
2017
California Supreme Court Holds Rest Periods Must Be Free From Duties And Employer Control Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
16
2015
Urock Network v. Umberto Sulpasso – Claim Preclusion Rocked Cancellation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
30
2023
Think Twice Before Closing the Shop Doors Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
18
2014
Review – U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Subject Matter Eligibility Guidelines Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
28
2018
Federal Court Curbs FCC Robocall Restrictions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
29
2020
DC Circuit Repudiates SEC Program for Testing Exchange Fee Structures Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
7
2023
Getty Image’s AI Model Training Lawsuit in UK Against Stability to Proceed Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
2
2020
High Risk of Second Requests in the Cannabis Industry Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
17
2019
NLRB Limits Union Access Rights to “Public Spaces” of Employers Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
16
2022
Ninth Circuit Grants Rehearing on California Law Banning Mandatory Employment Arbitration Agreements Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
20
2018
Ninth Circuit Holds National Park Service Has the Authority to Regulate Navigable Waters in Alaska’s National Parks and Prohibit the Use of Hovercraft (Again) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
13
2020
Maybe the FTC Can’t Take That to the Bank: The Supreme Court’s Decision in Liu v. SEC and Its Implications for the FTC’s Ability to Seek Equitable Monetary Relief Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
2
2017
New York Appellate Division Revives Non-Monetary Class Action Settlement in M&A Class Action with Revised Standard of Review Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
29
2014
North Carolina Court Issues First Decision Controlling Coop Pole Attachment Rates Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
22
2024
The Importance of Reasonable Particularity in a Doctrine of Equivalents Argument Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
4
2014
Pennsylvania Appellate Court Finds Uniform Written Obligations Act Inapplicable to Covenants Not to Compete Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
25
2022
The Developing “Avoided Costs” Remedy in Trade Secret Litigation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
24
2016
Quick Take on Justice Scalia’s Legacy on Antitrust Law Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
6
2024
Florida Joins California in Adopting Ethical Guidelines for Attorney’s Use of Generative AI Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
8
2022
Up In Smoke – CA Court of Appeal Dismisses Prop 65 Case Against Water Pipe Manufacturer Narrowly Construing The Term “Expose” Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
15
2015
Baker v. Microsoft Corporation: Game Companies Beware, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Decision May Make It More Difficult to Defeat Class Actions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
26
2013
False Press Release Leads To Exclusion From Federal Programs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
8
2013
U.S. Supreme Court Holds that Class Action Securities Fraud Plaintiffs Need Not Prove the Materiality of the Alleged False Statements or Omissions to Support Certification of a Class, Resolving Circuit Split Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
9
2020
Delaware Court of Chancery Clarifies that Management Cannot Unilaterally Curtail a Director’s Access to Corporation’s Privileged Information Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins