Litigation / Trial Practice

Litigation actions brought in the United States at the federal and state levels, cases in front of the  US Supreme Court (SCOTUS), and cases litigated before the different courts that comprise the US Court of Special Jurisdiction are among the different stories, news, and litigation, visitors to the National Law Review will read about on the litigation trial practice area of law.

Special jurisdictions including Federal Circuits, the Court of Special Jurisdictions, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), US Tax Court, the Patent and Trademark Appeals Board (PTAB), and other agency-related litigation and trial news is analyzed by the legal experts at the National Law Review. Actions and litigation brought to these special courts, coverage of tax appeals, bankruptcy proceedings, and international litigation which arise in the United States, Canada, China, the United Kingdom, and the European Union are also covered by the National Law Review.

Business and commercial litigation, patent litigation including inter partes reviews (IPRs), class action lawsuits, government actions, multi-party and multi-jurisdiction litigation, communications, environmental law, products liability claims, and trust and estate litigation, are topics that are covered on the site. Visitors can also read about the latest litigation in product liability claims, insurance claims, intellectual property, mergers and acquisition litigation, real estate development, and white-collar criminal actions, which involve prominent C-level executives and highly paid board members, on the National Law Review. Whistleblower litigation and stories of employees reporting high-level executives are also highly covered on the site. The impact of court cases across a variety of legal areas is analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review.

Along with breaking down the court’s decisions and opinions, NLR also covers information related to the trial and appellate-level practice in the United States. Evidentiary rules and hearings, eDiscovery claims, tort reform lawsuits, disputes arising out of the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA), and other state and federal appeals are covered online by the National Law Review.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Nov
17
2020
Texas v. California: SCOTUS Hears Oral Arguments About the Constitutionality of the ACA Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
19
2023
Supreme Court Hears Arguments on False Claims Act Scienter Standard Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
30
2020
Don’t Neglect Forum Selection and Choice of Law Provisions When Drafting or Litigating Restrictive Covenants Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
4
2023
NLRB General Counsel Issues Memo Updating Prosecutorial Priorities Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
21
2017
California Supreme Court Reaffirms Broad Right to Discovery in PAGA Actions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
11
2013
New York State Court of Appeals Backs Starbucks Policy on Tip-Pooling Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
21
2020
Ninth Circuit Applies the “Continued Use” Doctrine to the Defend Trade Secrets Act Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
1
2023
Supreme Court Narrows Scope of Waters Protected by the Clean Water Act in Sackett v. EPA Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
9
2016
California Supreme Court Approves Attorney Fee Awards Calculated Based Upon Percentage of Class Action Common Fund Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
9
2013
Still Standing: U.S. Court Upholds Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Conflicts Minerals Rule Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
14
2013
Second Circuit Holds That The Fair Labor Standards Act Does Not Bar The Enforcement of Class Action Waivers Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
15
2023
NLRB Overturns Standard for Independent Contractor Status Under the NLRA Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
3
2020
California State Court Declines to Expand Standing for Claims Under 1933 Act Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
6
2013
Delaware Chancery Court Finds Merger "Entirely Fair" to Common Stockholders Despite the Merger Leaving Common Stockholders With No Consideration for Their Shares Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
12
2013
Ninth Circuit Fumbles The Ball In Videogame Likeness Cases Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
20
2010
Time Out: California Court of Appeal Enforces Statute of Limitations in Class Action Brought Under the UCL Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
18
2010
Implied False Certification Theory Gains Support In Ninth Circuit Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
17
2023
Delaware Court of Chancery Clarifies Heightened Standard for Recovery of Attorneys’ Fees in Disclosure-Based Deal Litigation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
8
2010
Did A Butterfly Just Flap Its Wings? The Potential Industry-Wide Consequences Of The SBA's Recent Suspension Of A Premier IT Contractor Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
8
2014
Sixth Circuit Narrows Scope of Liability Under ICA (Investment Company Act) Sections 36(a) and (b) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
11
2022
Fintech Flips Script, Sues California Regulator Over 36% Rate Cap Law Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
30
2013
First Department Refuses to Expand Jurisdiction over Foreign Entities Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
25
2015
District Court for the EDNY Denies Motion to Dismiss Selective Enforcement Gender Discrimination and Retaliation Claims Related to Enforcement of Employer’s Hair Policy Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
22
2011
The Year 2010 In Review: Contractor Licensing Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
11
2021
Strengthening the TCPA’s Sovereign Immunity Shield—Fourth Circuit Rules Federal Employees Are Not Liable for Government-Mandated Robocalls Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
23
2022
Preserving Trade Secrets By Taking Additional Protective Measures In Your Licensing Agreement Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
25
2020
The New York State Courts Have Suspended Most Court Filings as of March 22, 2020 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
26
2011
Court Throws Out Antitrust Claims Against Netflix Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
6
2022
California Court of Appeal Addresses Derivative Standing and Failure of Oversight Claims Under Delaware Law Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
31
2023
Inguran, LLC, DBA STGenetics V. ABS Global, INC., Genius PLC, No. 2022-1385 (July 5, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
7
2020
AIPLA’s Updated Model Patent Jury Instructions Address “Clear and Convincing” Standard of Proof & Streamline Case Citations Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
8
2022
Los Angeles Superior Court Invalidates California Board Diversity Statute, Rendering It Ripe for Review by the California Court of Appeal Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
11
2014
Amgen/Sandoz Disputes Will Clarify BPCIA (Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act) Issues Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
21
2017
Second Circuit Affirms Class Certification Holding that Direct Evidence of Price Impact is Not Always Necessary to Demonstrate Market Efficiency Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
13
2011
Wal-Mart v. Dukes: Implications For Antitrust Class Actions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins