Litigation / Trial Practice

Litigation actions brought in the United States at the federal and state levels, cases in front of the  US Supreme Court (SCOTUS), and cases litigated before the different courts that comprise the US Court of Special Jurisdiction are among the different stories, news, and litigation, visitors to the National Law Review will read about on the litigation trial practice area of law.

Special jurisdictions including Federal Circuits, the Court of Special Jurisdictions, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), US Tax Court, the Patent and Trademark Appeals Board (PTAB), and other agency-related litigation and trial news is analyzed by the legal experts at the National Law Review. Actions and litigation brought to these special courts, coverage of tax appeals, bankruptcy proceedings, and international litigation which arise in the United States, Canada, China, the United Kingdom, and the European Union are also covered by the National Law Review.

Business and commercial litigation, patent litigation including inter partes reviews (IPRs), class action lawsuits, government actions, multi-party and multi-jurisdiction litigation, communications, environmental law, products liability claims, and trust and estate litigation, are topics that are covered on the site. Visitors can also read about the latest litigation in product liability claims, insurance claims, intellectual property, mergers and acquisition litigation, real estate development, and white-collar criminal actions, which involve prominent C-level executives and highly paid board members, on the National Law Review. Whistleblower litigation and stories of employees reporting high-level executives are also highly covered on the site. The impact of court cases across a variety of legal areas is analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review.

Along with breaking down the court’s decisions and opinions, NLR also covers information related to the trial and appellate-level practice in the United States. Evidentiary rules and hearings, eDiscovery claims, tort reform lawsuits, disputes arising out of the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA), and other state and federal appeals are covered online by the National Law Review.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Jun
15
2011
Former Student Athletes' Right of Publicity and Antitrust Claims Will Proceed Against the NCAA and Electronic Arts Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
15
2011
Supreme Court Upholds Inventor's Ownership of Patent Rights Under the Bayh-Dole Act Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
15
2011
Patent Law Unchanged by Microsoft Supreme Court Decision Vedder Price
Jun
15
2011
U.S. Supreme Court Decision May Dramatically Affect California Employee Arbitration Agreements Much Shelist, P.C.
Jun
14
2011
Supreme Court Upholds Clear and Convincing Standard for Invalidity but with a Twist Armstrong Teasdale
Jun
14
2011
Supreme Court Unanimously Maintains High Hurdle for Invalidity Defense Bracewell LLP
Jun
14
2011
Personal Jurisdiction Lacking Despite Twenty Internet Users from Forum State Signing Up for Defendant’s Website McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
14
2011
What Third-Party Retaliation Means for Your Business Much Shelist, P.C.
Jun
13
2011
The Need for a Detailed Procedure of Judicial Review of Civil Rights Arbitration Awards after Rent-A-Center West, Inc. v. Jackson American University Washington College of Law
Jun
13
2011
Supreme Court: Evidence Of Invalidity Must Be “Clear And Convincing” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
12
2011
Common Sense Variation Is Unpatentable McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
12
2011
California Court of Appeal Holds That State Courts Have Jurisdiction Over Securities Act Class Actions Unless the Action Is a "Covered Class Action" and Involves a "Covered Security" Under SLUSA Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
12
2011
Joint (Direct) Infringement Still Requires Control … But Stay Tuned McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
11
2011
A Four-Step Guide for Securing Patent Portfolios after Stanford v. Roche Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.
Jun
10
2011
Supreme Court: Bayh-Dole Act Does Not Eclipse Inventor's Rights Bracewell LLP
Jun
10
2011
Nonanalogous Art Lives! In Re Klein Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
10
2011
No Seventh Circuit Rehearing in Kraft ERISA "Excessive Fees" Case McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
10
2011
Agree to Assign vs. Hereby Assign: In Stanford v. Roche, the Wording of Assignment Agreements Determines Patent Ownership Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
9
2011
Supreme Court Leaves Standard for Patent Invalidity Unchanged Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Jun
9
2011
Supreme Court Attempts to Clarify Bayh-Dole Act Vedder Price
Jun
9
2011
Supreme Court Unanimously Rejects Fifth Circuit’s Loss Causation Standard Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jun
9
2011
Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership et al.: Supreme Court Observations Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
9
2011
Supreme Court decides Stanford v. Roche – Clarifies Scope of Bayh-Dole Act Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
8
2011
U.S. Supreme Court: Investors Can Seek Class Action Status Without Proving Loss Causation Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Jun
8
2011
ARB Ruling Takes Broad View of Scope of Protected Activity Under SOX Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Jun
7
2011
Even Under Bayh-Dole, Employee Inventor Has First Dibs McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
7
2011
Reexamination Practice: One Size Does Not Fit All Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
7
2011
Perils of Reissue - Recapture Doctrine Has Teeth! Bracewell LLP
Jun
7
2011
Workplace Fatalities and OSHA Investigations - Questions & Concerns Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jun
6
2011
New Standards for Litigants in Patent Cases: Inequitable Conduct is No Longer a Boiler Plate Defense Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.
Jun
6
2011
ALJ finds parts supplier unlawfully discharged 20 immigrant employees in Minnesota after they refused to sign away NLRA and other rights National Labor Relations Board
Jun
6
2011
False Advertising Injunction Upheld; It’s All Good … And Good for You McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
4
2011
Federal Circuit Attempts to Eradicate the Plague of Inequitable Conduct, Sets New Standards Vedder Price
Jun
3
2011
European Court of Justice Extends Injunction Granted in One Jurisdiction to Entirety of European Union McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
3
2011
Making Therasense of the Inequitable Conduct Doctrine Bracewell LLP
Jun
2
2011
Seventh Circuit: Policyholder Is Entitled to Independent Counsel at Insurer’s Expense Where Excess Judgment Is Likely Vedder Price
Jun
2
2011
Yahoo! Expands Policy on Maintaining User Data Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.
Jun
2
2011
Turning a Blind Eye to Critical Facts leads to Induced Infringement Under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b) Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
2
2011
U.S. Supreme Court Rules Arbitration Clauses May Waive Class Action Rights McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
1
2011
The Hacker Who Avoided a False Marking Claim McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
1
2011
Standing and In Pari Delicto Issues Arising in Bankruptcy Cases The University of Iowa College of Law
Jun
1
2011
Federal Circuit Significantly Restricts the Doctrine of Inequitable Conduct in Therasense v. Becton Dickenson Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
31
2011
U.S. Supreme Court Establishes State-of-Mind Requirement for Inducing Infringement Liability Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
May
31
2011
Federal Judge Orders California Waste Hauling Firm to Reinstate Two Drivers and Cease Anti-Union Activity National Labor Relations Board
May
31
2011
10 Things Every Small Business Owner Should Know About Contract Law Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
May
30
2011
Spectrum Healthcare Settles Charges with NLRB and Union, Agrees to Reinstate Employees with Backpay and Sign Collective Bargaining Agreement National Labor Relations Board
May
30
2011
Therasense Makes Sense of Inequitable Conduct Defense Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
30
2011
Texas, We Have A Problem: E-Filing In The Wild West Hunton Andrews Kurth
May
29
2011
Prevailing Antitrust Defendants Recover $367,000 in e-Discovery Costs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
27
2011
Therasense Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Company—The Federal Circuit tightens the standards necessary to establish the inequitable conduct defense by requiring a “but-for” showing of materiality Hunton Andrews Kurth
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins