Litigation / Trial Practice

Litigation actions brought in the United States at the federal and state levels, cases in front of the  US Supreme Court (SCOTUS), and cases litigated before the different courts that comprise the US Court of Special Jurisdiction are among the different stories, news, and litigation, visitors to the National Law Review will read about on the litigation trial practice area of law.

Special jurisdictions including Federal Circuits, the Court of Special Jurisdictions, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), US Tax Court, the Patent and Trademark Appeals Board (PTAB), and other agency-related litigation and trial news is analyzed by the legal experts at the National Law Review. Actions and litigation brought to these special courts, coverage of tax appeals, bankruptcy proceedings, and international litigation which arise in the United States, Canada, China, the United Kingdom, and the European Union are also covered by the National Law Review.

Business and commercial litigation, patent litigation including inter partes reviews (IPRs), class action lawsuits, government actions, multi-party and multi-jurisdiction litigation, communications, environmental law, products liability claims, and trust and estate litigation, are topics that are covered on the site. Visitors can also read about the latest litigation in product liability claims, insurance claims, intellectual property, mergers and acquisition litigation, real estate development, and white-collar criminal actions, which involve prominent C-level executives and highly paid board members, on the National Law Review. Whistleblower litigation and stories of employees reporting high-level executives are also highly covered on the site. The impact of court cases across a variety of legal areas is analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review.

Along with breaking down the court’s decisions and opinions, NLR also covers information related to the trial and appellate-level practice in the United States. Evidentiary rules and hearings, eDiscovery claims, tort reform lawsuits, disputes arising out of the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA), and other state and federal appeals are covered online by the National Law Review.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Sep
10
2013
In the wake of the California Supreme Court's Harris Decision, A FEHA Claimant Must Show Discrimination was a "Substantial Motivating Factor" and An Employer Waives its Mixed-Motive Defense by Failing to Assert It in Its Answer Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
31
2020
United States v. Blaszczak: Second Circuit Ruling Creates Opening for Significant Increase in Insider Trading Prosecutions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
8
2010
California Court of Appeal Extends Wrongful Termination Cause of Action Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
3
2010
Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies Law Regarding Standing of Plaintiff-Shareholders to Bring a Post-Merger Double Derivative Action Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
19
2010
Fifth Circuit Rejects Section 10(B) Scheme Liability in Absence of Explicit Attribution of Conduct or Statements to Defendant Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
28
2015
District Court Enjoins Federal Regulations Revising Scope of Clean Water Act Jurisdiction Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
14
2020
California Court Sets High Bar For Class Certification In False Advertising Cases Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
26
2022
Are You Ready for Web3.0 and the Legal Issues it Will Bring? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
12
2021
A “Culture Of Concealment” – Scrutinizing Overbroad NDAs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
23
2013
Tenth Circuit Finds that Jury Must Determine Whether “Notes Are Securities” in a Securities Fraud Action Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
5
2013
Proposed New York Law Would Extend State Anti-Discrimination Protections to Unpaid Interns Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
30
2011
NFL Fans - Are You Ready for Some... Antitrust Litigation? Players Sue, Claiming Lockout is a Group Boycott Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
24
2021
Delaware Court of Chancery Holds that a Contractual Delaware Choice of Law Provision Did Not Waive Plaintiff’s Claim Under the California Securities Act Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
1
2023
Parus Holdings, Inc. v. Google LLC, No. 2022-1269, 2022-1270 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 12, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
4
2020
Machine Learning Patentability in 2019: 5 Cases Analyzed and Lessons Learned Part 3 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
11
2011
Final Decision Suspends California's AB 32 GHG Regulations: What Now? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
10
2023
Sanderling Management v. Snap Inc. No. 21-2173 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2023) Alice – 35 U.S.C. § 101 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
10
2014
Allegations that Defendants Provided Product for “Free” State Claims Under California’s Unfair Practices Act (UPA) and Unfair Competition Law (UCL), Notwithstanding that “Cost” of Product Was Recouped by Overcharging for Shipping Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
6
2013
$2.3 Million Trial Verdict Against Newegg Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
10
2016
Supreme Court and the Lanham Act: Lee v Tam Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
26
2011
Ninth Circuit Rejects Consumer Antitrust Challenge To Cable Television Bundling Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
6
2011
June Proves To Be A Busy Month For ARB And Its Proposed Cap-and-Trade Program Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
19
2013
Plaintiffs Hit an Illinois Brick Wall: Indirect Purchasers of iPhone Apps Lack Standing to Bring Antitrust Suit Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
30
2014
Unlawful California Development Permit Conditions Not Binding On Second Permit Applicant When Original Permit Expires Without Use – Second District Changes Mind On Changed Facts Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
18
2022
Sow What Now?: Cal. Hispanic Chambers of Commerce et. al. v. Ross et. al., The U.S. Supreme Court, and California’s Proposition 12 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
19
2017
The End of Union-Dictated Micro-Units: NLRB Overturns Specialty Healthcare Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
15
2023
CFPB Reaches $2.6 Billion Settlement with Credit Repair Company Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
26
2011
A Case Where CEQA Worked Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
7
2011
Court Upholds ESOP's Change in Investment Conversion Rules Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
13
2019
California Supreme Court Announces a Win for Payroll Outsourcing Industry Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
25
2011
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Holds That Bad Foreclosure = Bad Title For Bona Fide Purchaser Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
24
2016
Texas Federal Court Blocks New Salary Restrictions for Exempt Employees Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
14
2011
Netflix Wins Summary Judgment Dismissal Of Consumer Class Antitrust Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
31
2022
Securities and Exchange Commission V. LBRY; Is Your Crypto Project Illegal? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
6
2012
Court of Appeal Reminds Litigants That Settling With Named Plaintiff Does Not Necessarily End Putative Class Action Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins