Litigation / Trial Practice

Litigation actions brought in the United States at the federal and state levels, cases in front of the  US Supreme Court (SCOTUS), and cases litigated before the different courts that comprise the US Court of Special Jurisdiction are among the different stories, news, and litigation, visitors to the National Law Review will read about on the litigation trial practice area of law.

Special jurisdictions including Federal Circuits, the Court of Special Jurisdictions, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), US Tax Court, the Patent and Trademark Appeals Board (PTAB), and other agency-related litigation and trial news is analyzed by the legal experts at the National Law Review. Actions and litigation brought to these special courts, coverage of tax appeals, bankruptcy proceedings, and international litigation which arise in the United States, Canada, China, the United Kingdom, and the European Union are also covered by the National Law Review.

Business and commercial litigation, patent litigation including inter partes reviews (IPRs), class action lawsuits, government actions, multi-party and multi-jurisdiction litigation, communications, environmental law, products liability claims, and trust and estate litigation, are topics that are covered on the site. Visitors can also read about the latest litigation in product liability claims, insurance claims, intellectual property, mergers and acquisition litigation, real estate development, and white-collar criminal actions, which involve prominent C-level executives and highly paid board members, on the National Law Review. Whistleblower litigation and stories of employees reporting high-level executives are also highly covered on the site. The impact of court cases across a variety of legal areas is analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review.

Along with breaking down the court’s decisions and opinions, NLR also covers information related to the trial and appellate-level practice in the United States. Evidentiary rules and hearings, eDiscovery claims, tort reform lawsuits, disputes arising out of the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA), and other state and federal appeals are covered online by the National Law Review.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Jan
27
2018
DOJ’s Blue Book Partially Unsealed Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
5
2019
Ninth Circuit Holds That Statutes Do Not Constitute “Rules or Regulations of the SEC” for Purposes of Sarbanes-Oxley Act Whistleblower Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
23
2022
Los Angeles Superior Court Invalidates California Law Requiring Gender Diversity on Company Boards Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
25
2022
Supreme Court Discrimination Case Narrows Scope of Restitution for Individuals Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
11
2014
County of San Diego’s Adopted Climate Action Plan Violates CEQA: Fails to Include Enforceable GHG Reduction Measures Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
6
2012
New York High Court Holds That State Blue Sky Law Does Not Preempt Common Law Claims Involving Securities Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
20
2014
Delaware Court of Chancery Applies Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing to Prohibit An Acquiring Entity From Diverting Revenues to Depress Payouts Under a Contingent Purchase Price Provision Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
23
2014
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Clarifies “Patent Eligible Subject” Matter in its Recent Guidance in Light of Alice Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
5
2015
AFL-CIO’s Industry Wide Agreement May Have Wide Reach in Hospitality Industry Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
9
2015
Contracts: No Change Of Position, No Estoppel Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
26
2014
Proceed with Caution: D.C. District Court Says Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Doctrine Do Not Survive Internal Fraud Investigation Conducted by Non-Attorneys Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
29
2020
(Cheer)Leading By Example: UK’s Cheerleading Scandal and Lessons for Leaders Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
31
2014
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA): Seeking Safe Harbor in a Sea of Troubles Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
19
2017
Delaware Supreme Court Confirms Dilution Claims Typically Are Derivative and Are Extinguished After Merger Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
14
2018
Healthcare Industry Beware: The Use of Statistical Sampling to Establish Damages and Liability Under the False Claims Act Remains a Viable Option for Plaintiffs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
24
2023
Sisvel International S.A. v. Sierra Wireless, Inc., No. 2022-1387, 2022-1492 (Fed. Cir. Sept 1, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
3
2023
Federal Court Issues Nationwide Injunction of CFPB’s Small Business Lending Rule Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
18
2014
J.M. Smucker Company Gets Out of a Jam in Food Labeling Case Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
25
2016
Warren Distribution v. Royal Purple – What’s in a Name? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
7
2018
California Sues Sutter Health Alleging Anti-Competitive Practices Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
29
2020
DC Circuit Repudiates SEC Program for Testing Exchange Fee Structures Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
10
2023
Federal Circuit Vacates PTAB’s Decision Based on an Overly Narrow Claim Construction Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
2
2020
High Risk of Second Requests in the Cannabis Industry Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
17
2019
NLRB Limits Union Access Rights to “Public Spaces” of Employers Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
26
2018
Labor Board Back to Five Member Composition – What Obama-Era Precedent Is Next on the Chopping Block? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
2
2017
Proposed Legislation May Significantly Limit Class Action Litigation in Federal Court Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
16
2022
Ninth Circuit Grants Rehearing on California Law Banning Mandatory Employment Arbitration Agreements Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
13
2020
Maybe the FTC Can’t Take That to the Bank: The Supreme Court’s Decision in Liu v. SEC and Its Implications for the FTC’s Ability to Seek Equitable Monetary Relief Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
16
2017
California Court of Appeal Affirms Validity of Hospital Meal Period Waivers Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
31
2018
“Ban the Box” Laws & Workplace Violence: An Employer’s Failure to Sufficiently Perform Background Checks Could Lead To Costly Negligence Liability Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
25
2022
The Developing “Avoided Costs” Remedy in Trade Secret Litigation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
5
2018
Court Expands Reach of California PAGA Representative Actions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
31
2017
“Oh Yes [the Court] Did” — District Court Grants Motion to Dismiss ADA Complaint Until the DOJ Issues Implementing Regulations and Renders Technical Assistance Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
15
2018
Following Repeal of the Individual Mandate, Twenty States Challenge the Affordable Care Act Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
8
2022
Up In Smoke – CA Court of Appeal Dismisses Prop 65 Case Against Water Pipe Manufacturer Narrowly Construing The Term “Expose” Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins