Litigation / Trial Practice

Litigation actions brought in the United States at the federal and state levels, cases in front of the  US Supreme Court (SCOTUS), and cases litigated before the different courts that comprise the US Court of Special Jurisdiction are among the different stories, news, and litigation, visitors to the National Law Review will read about on the litigation trial practice area of law.

Special jurisdictions including Federal Circuits, the Court of Special Jurisdictions, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), US Tax Court, the Patent and Trademark Appeals Board (PTAB), and other agency-related litigation and trial news is analyzed by the legal experts at the National Law Review. Actions and litigation brought to these special courts, coverage of tax appeals, bankruptcy proceedings, and international litigation which arise in the United States, Canada, China, the United Kingdom, and the European Union are also covered by the National Law Review.

Business and commercial litigation, patent litigation including inter partes reviews (IPRs), class action lawsuits, government actions, multi-party and multi-jurisdiction litigation, communications, environmental law, products liability claims, and trust and estate litigation, are topics that are covered on the site. Visitors can also read about the latest litigation in product liability claims, insurance claims, intellectual property, mergers and acquisition litigation, real estate development, and white-collar criminal actions, which involve prominent C-level executives and highly paid board members, on the National Law Review. Whistleblower litigation and stories of employees reporting high-level executives are also highly covered on the site. The impact of court cases across a variety of legal areas is analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review.

Along with breaking down the court’s decisions and opinions, NLR also covers information related to the trial and appellate-level practice in the United States. Evidentiary rules and hearings, eDiscovery claims, tort reform lawsuits, disputes arising out of the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA), and other state and federal appeals are covered online by the National Law Review.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Mar
18
2013
Update: Crane Decision is Overturned by The United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois Much Shelist, P.C.
Mar
24
2011
Racial Discrimination and the Hostile Work Environment: Employers May Be Responsible for the Actions of Their Customers and Vendors Much Shelist, P.C.
Feb
17
2012
Landlords' Rights in Chapter 11: Protecting Your Post-Petition Rent Stream Much Shelist, P.C.
Jun
26
2014
Piercing the Corporate Veil: What You Find on the Other Side May Surprise You Much Shelist, P.C.
Jul
20
2009
Voluntary Binding Arbitration Agreements? Think Before You Act Fairfield and Woods P.C.
Jul
24
2009
Colorado Employee Fired for Protesting Lack of Breaks May Sue for Wrongful Discharge - Sometimes! Fairfield and Woods P.C.
Feb
7
2022
Illinois Supreme Court Rules BIPA Claims Are Not Preempted by the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Act Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
29
2023
Buyer Beware: Delaware Courts Continue to Refuse to Enforce Deal-Based Non-Competes Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
20
2017
Court Denies Motion for Conditional Certification Based Upon Deficient Allegations, Reminding Employers of the Value of Testing the Sufficiency of Allegations Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
10
2013
In the wake of the California Supreme Court's Harris Decision, A FEHA Claimant Must Show Discrimination was a "Substantial Motivating Factor" and An Employer Waives its Mixed-Motive Defense by Failing to Assert It in Its Answer Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
18
2020
Machine Learning Patentability in 2019: 5 Cases Analyzed and Lessons Learned Part 2 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
8
2010
California Court of Appeal Extends Wrongful Termination Cause of Action Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
15
2016
Federal Circuit is In Sync with Patent’s Validity Under Section 101 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
25
2022
California and Georgia Reach Settlement with Rent-to-Own Companies Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
3
2010
Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies Law Regarding Standing of Plaintiff-Shareholders to Bring a Post-Merger Double Derivative Action Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
19
2010
Fifth Circuit Rejects Section 10(B) Scheme Liability in Absence of Explicit Attribution of Conduct or Statements to Defendant Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
23
2021
LG Chem’s Win In $1 Billion Electric Vehicle Trade Secret Dispute Upheld by International Trade Commission Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
23
2013
Tenth Circuit Finds that Jury Must Determine Whether “Notes Are Securities” in a Securities Fraud Action Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
5
2013
Proposed New York Law Would Extend State Anti-Discrimination Protections to Unpaid Interns Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
30
2011
NFL Fans - Are You Ready for Some... Antitrust Litigation? Players Sue, Claiming Lockout is a Group Boycott Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
11
2011
Final Decision Suspends California's AB 32 GHG Regulations: What Now? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
21
2020
The Impact of COVID-19 on International Arbitration Hearings Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
22
2023
Fifth Circuit Upends 30 Years of Title VII Precedent, Making it Easier for Employees to Bring Discrimination Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
7
2014
New Commercial Division Rule Seeks to Streamline Privilege Log Requirements for New York Litigants Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
16
2015
Pay to Play: Appellate Division Upholds Ruling that Payment is Required to Qualify for Champerty Safe Harbor Provision Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
6
2013
$2.3 Million Trial Verdict Against Newegg Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
22
2015
Whew! That Was Close – D.C. Circuit Reaffirms Application of Attorney-Client Privilege and Attorney Work Product Doctrine in Internal Investigations Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
14
2022
Less is More: Brevity is the Soul of Wit Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
26
2011
Ninth Circuit Rejects Consumer Antitrust Challenge To Cable Television Bundling Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
6
2011
June Proves To Be A Busy Month For ARB And Its Proposed Cap-and-Trade Program Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
28
2015
Ninth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Challenge to Alleged Horizontal Adoption of Minimum Advertised Prices Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
19
2013
Plaintiffs Hit an Illinois Brick Wall: Indirect Purchasers of iPhone Apps Lack Standing to Bring Antitrust Suit Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
27
2014
Delaware Court of Chancery Rejects Contemporaneous Ownership Requirement For Creditors Asserting Derivative Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
30
2014
The EEOC’s Assault on Separation Agreements – A Bump in the Road, But It’s Far From Over Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
29
2022
DOJ’s Renewed Focus On Corporate Ethics & Compliance Programs Highlights Importance Of Organizational Integrity Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins