Litigation / Trial Practice

Litigation actions brought in the United States at the federal and state levels, cases in front of the  US Supreme Court (SCOTUS), and cases litigated before the different courts that comprise the US Court of Special Jurisdiction are among the different stories, news, and litigation, visitors to the National Law Review will read about on the litigation trial practice area of law.

Special jurisdictions including Federal Circuits, the Court of Special Jurisdictions, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), US Tax Court, the Patent and Trademark Appeals Board (PTAB), and other agency-related litigation and trial news is analyzed by the legal experts at the National Law Review. Actions and litigation brought to these special courts, coverage of tax appeals, bankruptcy proceedings, and international litigation which arise in the United States, Canada, China, the United Kingdom, and the European Union are also covered by the National Law Review.

Business and commercial litigation, patent litigation including inter partes reviews (IPRs), class action lawsuits, government actions, multi-party and multi-jurisdiction litigation, communications, environmental law, products liability claims, and trust and estate litigation, are topics that are covered on the site. Visitors can also read about the latest litigation in product liability claims, insurance claims, intellectual property, mergers and acquisition litigation, real estate development, and white-collar criminal actions, which involve prominent C-level executives and highly paid board members, on the National Law Review. Whistleblower litigation and stories of employees reporting high-level executives are also highly covered on the site. The impact of court cases across a variety of legal areas is analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review.

Along with breaking down the court’s decisions and opinions, NLR also covers information related to the trial and appellate-level practice in the United States. Evidentiary rules and hearings, eDiscovery claims, tort reform lawsuits, disputes arising out of the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA), and other state and federal appeals are covered online by the National Law Review.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Apr
14
2011
Municipalities Are Responsible For Discharges Of Stormwater Regardless Of The Ultimate Source Of Pollution Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
21
2020
The Impact of COVID-19 on International Arbitration Hearings Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
10
2014
Allegations that Defendants Provided Product for “Free” State Claims Under California’s Unfair Practices Act (UPA) and Unfair Competition Law (UCL), Notwithstanding that “Cost” of Product Was Recouped by Overcharging for Shipping Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
16
2011
Court Tosses Transpacific Air Passengers' Claims Based on Alleged Overcharges for Flights Originating in Asia Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
1
2016
Ninth Circuit Confirms Brazil v. Dole Decertification Due to Faulty Damages Model Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
26
2011
In Pineda's Wake: Constraints on Song-Beverly Class Action Litigation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
6
2013
Substantial Evidence Test Applies to Decision Not to Require Additional Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
1
2022
NLRB to Decide Whether Misclassification Is Standalone Violation of the NLRA Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
15
2016
No Protection for Network Marketing Provider That Had Knowledge and Authority to Control Deceptive Conduct of Affiliates Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
1
2015
Ninth Circuit Declares That Individualized Damages Issues Alone Never, Ever Preclude Certification of a Rule 23(b)(3) Class Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
23
2013
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Approves Consent Order Regarding “Made in USA” False Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
18
2022
Sow What Now?: Cal. Hispanic Chambers of Commerce et. al. v. Ross et. al., The U.S. Supreme Court, and California’s Proposition 12 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
27
2011
California Court of Appeal Refuses to Permit an Action for Rescission of a Strategic Transaction, Holding That a Board Has No Duty Under California Law to Include a "Fiduciary Out" Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
11
2014
Utah District Court Strikes Down Regulation of Purely Intrastate Species on Private Land Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
27
2011
Wax This! New York Court Finds Restrictive Covenant In Hair Removal Specialist's Employment Agreement Unreasonable and Unenforceable Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
5
2011
A Chapter 11 Diaspora? House Judiciary Committee Considers Chapter 11 Venue Reform Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
21
2011
Dispelling the Myth of MERS as a "Sham" Beneficiary Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
28
2011
OFAC, BIS Double Up Flow Serve: What the Flowserve Settlement Says About Corporate Compliance Programs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
5
2019
The US Supreme Court Finds that International Organizations’ Immunity Is On Par With That of Foreign Governments Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
12
2011
California Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument In Key Meal/Rest Period Case Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
22
2011
In Ninth Circuit, Whistleblowers Not Exempt From Confidentiality Agreements Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
16
2011
Cherchez les Catalogues Raisonné Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
30
2011
RIM Defeats Sherman Act Section 2 Claims At Pleading Stage Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
31
2022
Securities and Exchange Commission V. LBRY; Is Your Crypto Project Illegal? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
31
2012
The Ninth Circuit Applies the Brakes to Runaway Nationwide Class Actions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
25
2014
Everyone Gets To See The Evidence: The California Court Of Appeal Rejects an Attorneys’ Fee Award Based On The Trial Court’s In Camera Review Of Class Counsel’s Billing Records Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
15
2014
Clear Sailing Ahead For Class Counsel in California Settlement Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
24
2015
Ninth Circuit Severely Limits “Rogue Employee” Exception for Corporations in Securities Fraud Cases Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
18
2014
No Proof Necessary: SCOTUS Rules Defendant’s Notice Of Removal Under CAFA Need Not Include Evidence of The Amount In Controversy Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
25
2015
Clash of Civil and Common Law: Case Guidance System v. Stare Decisis Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
3
2017
California Supreme Court Holds Rest Periods Must Be Free From Duties And Employer Control Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
27
2021
Activision Files Lawsuit Over the Rights to Use the Word Warzone in the Call Of Duty Series Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
30
2014
Allegations That Designer Wedding Dress Line Constitutes A Relevant Product Market Found Implausible Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
30
2023
Think Twice Before Closing the Shop Doors Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
15
2020
Materiality Concerns For CARES Act Enforcement Cases Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins