July 2, 2022

Volume XII, Number 183

Advertisement
Advertisement

July 01, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 30, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 29, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

Age Discrimination and COVID-19: What to Do When Employees Are in High-Risk Groups

Earlier this year, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) addressed age discrimination issues related to COVID-19. Based on the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) explanation that individuals 65 years of age and older are at a higher risk for having a severe case of COVID-19 if they contract the virus, the EEOC encouraged employers to offer maximum flexibility to individuals in this age group. This flexibility was intended to offer older employees a way to continue to work even if they did not feel safe in the workplace.

However, the EEOC was clear that the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) prohibits employment discrimination against individuals age 40 and older. Accordingly, the EEOC said the ADEA prohibits an employer from involuntarily excluding an individual from the workplace based on the individual being age 65 or older. This prohibition encompasses situations in which an employer would not allow an employee in this age group to go into the workplace while allowing others more flexibility to go to the workplace. This is true even if the employer is trying to protect the employee and acting for benevolent reasons.

Priority in Vaccinations

Some employers have now asked if they should be concerned if they put employees age 65 or older in the front of the line for any COVID-19 vaccinations. First, it is important to note that states are making specific determinations as to groups that receive priority in receiving vaccinations, and it is clear that following the wave, one of the earlier groups that will be eligible for vaccinations before others, will be those who are of a specific age. Employers that decide to follow state priority determinations to allow for vaccinations of high-risk employees would likely not be at risk of creating any discrimination issues under the ADEA. Employers that mandate vaccinations for only employees in this age group but not younger employees or those without disabilities may face greater risks.

Key Takeaways

So, while an employer may be safe in encouraging or mandating its older employees to receive the vaccine when it becomes available to them, it may want to consider taking the same stance as the vaccine becomes available to other groups of its employees in order to avoid any ADEA issues.

Regardless of whether an employer addresses vaccinations as they become available to different groups or waits and mandates or encourages all employees to be vaccinated at the same time, employers may want to review or draft a vaccination policy now and be prepared for the issues that may arise.

© 2022, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume X, Number 352
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Katherine Dudley Helms, Ogletree Deakins Law Firm, Health and Employment Attorney
Office Managing Shareholder

Ms. Helms has extensive experience representing clients in employment matters as varied as the practice offers.  She has represented companies and individuals in both the private and public sectors ranging from production line supervisors to company executives.  Having represented clients in forums from mediation to the United State Supreme Court allows Ms. Helms the perspective and knowledge to work closely with her clients to offer creative solutions to age old problems.  Ms. Helms frequently guides clients to take what is learned through administrative complaints and/...

803-252-1300
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement