October 27, 2020

Volume X, Number 301

Advertisement

October 27, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 26, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Alliance of California Fitness Professionals Sues State Over Stay-at-Home Orders

In response to the ongoing state-imposed closures and limitations of gyms and other fitness establishments based on the COVID-19 pandemic, an organization representing the fitness industry has filed suit in Los Angeles Superior Court seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against Governor Gavin Newsom and other state entities and officials.

On March 19, 2020, the State of California was one of the first states to issue a stay-at-home order in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The order required all businesses to close, except for essential critical infrastructure. Since March, the state has gone from closure to reopening, to closure again. In July, the Governor ordered the closure of indoor operations of several industries, including gyms and fitness centers.

Now, seven months after the initial stay-at-home order, gyms and fitness centers in a majority of counties in the state can only open outdoors, with modifications, according to the “Safer Economy” slowed reopening announced at the end of August.

The Complaint filed by the California Fitness Alliance (CFA) states the CFA does not challenge the government’s ability to act to address a public health crisis. Instead, CFA is challenging “the duration, breadth, and arbitrariness” of the stay-at-home orders and reopening plans, especially as it pertains to the fitness industry.

CFA contends that orders exceeded the government’s authority under state law, including the California Emergency Services Act. The Complaint states that the Governor has acted arbitrarily in refusing to allow fitness establishments to remain open for indoor operations. As evidence, it notes a period between June and July in which indoor fitness operations were permitted to resume, with tailored guidance, and there was no evidence of outbreaks of COVID-19 linked to those facilities.

The CFA not only challenges the state’s orders, but also the Los Angeles County Health Order and Reopening Plan.

While the Complaint focuses on the fitness industry, if the court agrees with the CFA’s contentions, such a challenge could affect the validity of other closures issued by the State of California and other counties orders.

Jackson Lewis attorneys will continue to monitor this and similar actions pertaining to COVID-19 business orders.

Reopening orders contain extensive requirements creating compliance issues that can vary significantly depending on the specific state or local jurisdiction.

Jackson Lewis P.C. © 2020National Law Review, Volume X, Number 261
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Adam Siegel, Employment Attorney, Whistleblower claims, Jackson Lewis Law FIrm
Principal

Adam Y. Siegel is a Shareholder in the Los Angeles, California office of Jackson Lewis P.C.

Mr. Siegel focuses mainly in employment litigation and represents both private and public sector employers in all aspects of employment law, specializing in litigation and trial of harassment, discrimination, breach of contract, wage/hour, due process, and other employment related claims and has litigated cases in both state and federal court.  As part of his extensive public sector experience, Mr. Siegel has conducted and prepared Investigation Reports pursuant to the California Government...

213-630-8241
Cecilie E. Read KM Attorney Los Angeles
KM Attorney

Cecilie E. Read is the Knowledge Management (“KM”) Attorney for Jackson Lewis P.C.’s California Advice and Counsel Resource Group, and is based in the Los Angeles, California, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. She uses her expansive understanding of the complexities of California employment law to ensure all Jackson Lewis attorneys are consistently ahead of the curve and working efficiently to serve clients.

Prior to joining Jackson Lewis, Ms. Read defended employers in a wide range of industries in employment claims from single-plaintiff harassment claims to wage and hour class actions. She used her understanding of how claims play out in court and arbitration to counsel employers on compliance.

213-689-0404
Advertisement
Advertisement