June 2, 2020

June 01, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 30, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Bay Area Counties Implement Updated Shelter-in-Place Orders with April 2 Deadline for Compliance

As of 11:59 pm on March 31, 2020, and continuing through at least May 3, 2020, multiple Bay Area counties have implemented updated Shelter-in-Place orders in response to the worsening COVID-19 outbreak.  Updated Orders have been issued in Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Santa Clara, San Francisco, and San Mateo Counties, as well as the City of Berkeley. As with the previous Shelter-in-Place Orders, individuals must remain in their homes except for certain essential purposes. These new orders clarify, and in some cases limit, the types of businesses that are deemed essential.

Two new requirements will now apply to all Essential Businesses. First, all Essential Businesses remaining in operation must “prepare, post, and implement a Social Distancing Protocol at each of their facilities at which they are maintaining operations.” The Orders provide a sample Protocol for each business to complete, and mandate that each Protocol be posted at or near the entrance to the facility in plain view of the public and employees. Among other things, the Protocols must explain what steps the business is taking to protect the health of its employees, maintain social distancing among customers, and increase sanitization. Each employee must also be provided with a copy of the Protocol, and essential businesses must produce a copy to government authorities upon request. These Protocols must be in place no later than 11:59 pm on April 2, 2020. Second, essential businesses are directed to “maximize” the number of employees who work from home and may only require employees to work outside the home if they cannot perform their job duties at home.

Several other provisions limit which types of businesses and business functions may now be classified as “essential.”  First, businesses with both essential and non-essential components must now scale down operations to only their essential components. Second, all businesses are now prohibited from manufacturing or assembling non-essential products. Third, retail outlets selling both essential and non-essential goods may stay open only if their sales of essential products are a “significant” part of their business. Fourth, construction is now considered essential only under certain narrowly-defined conditions. Fifth, businesses that supply products needed for people to work from home are no longer essential businesses and must cease operations (except minimum basic operations) at their Bay Area facilities. For all businesses not classified as Essential, they may continue operating only as necessary to perform “Minimum Basic Operations.” These include activities necessary to maintain and protect the value of the business’s inventory and facilities, ensure safety, security, and sanitation, and process payroll and employee benefits.

These provisions are not comprehensive, and the requirements of these orders will vary depending upon the nature of the business and the particular duties of the employee. 

©2020 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Lindsay E. Hutner, San Francisco, Greenberg Traurig, Of Counsel, employment law, litigation, California, class action, wage and hour laws
Of Counsel

Lindsay E. Hutner focuses her practice on employment law, with an emphasis on litigation matters. She represents clients in both federal and state courts, as well as before administrative agencies, defending companies in both class actions and single-plaintiff cases involving employment discrimination, harassment, retaliation, wage and hour, unfair competition, enforcement of non-competes and other restrictive covenants, misappropriation of trade secrets, wrongful termination, and breach of contract.

To mitigate risk, Lindsay advises employers...

415-655-1312
Samuel Hyde Labor Lawyer Greenberg Traurig Law Firm
Associate

Samuel S. Hyde is a member of the Labor & Employment and Litigation practices in Greenberg Traurig's Sacramento office. He assists clients with general labor & employment and general litigation matters.

Prior to joining the firm, Samuel served as a law clerk for the Honorable Dale A. Drozd for the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, where he worked on a variety of civil cases including trade secret matters, employment disputes, property disputes, breaches of contract, civil rights, and habeas.

Sam has also acted as Special Counsel to the General Counsel for the National Security Agency (NSA). He provided legal and policy advice in direct support to NSA’s General Counsel. He drafted formal and informal legal briefings, defending the Agency’s positions in the interagency process, to Congress, and to the public. Through his work at NSA, Sam obtained a top-secret security clearance with access to sensitive compartmented information.

916-868-0675