Nov 4 2011 |
ARB Passes Final Regulations for Cap-And-Trade Program |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 13 2011 |
California Court of Appeal Clarifies Breach of Warranty Law in Class Actions and Vacates Order Certifying Class of Consumers in American Honda Motor Company, Inc. v. Superior Court |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Sep 6 2019 |
California Supreme Court Applies Notice-Prejudice Rule to Violation of First-Party Consent Provision as a Predicate to Policy Forfeiture, but Confirms that No Prejudice is Required to Enforce a Third-Party “No Voluntary Payments” Provision |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 8 2013 |
Dang v. San Francisco Forty Niners - Consumers Can Challenge Reebok's Exclusive NFL Apparel Deal Based Just on a Market of Garments Bearing NFL Team Logos |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 23 2019 |
AB 1291 Forces California Cannabis Companies To Sign “Labor Peace Agreements” With Unions, But Statute May be Unconstitutional |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 14 2019 |
Adventist – St. Joseph Merger: AG Concludes Merger is Not in the Public Interest |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 27 2019 |
The Death of One California Privacy Class Action, and the Birth of Another |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 29 2014 |
If It’s Not In Writing, It Didn’t Happen: Oral Promises To Modify A Loan Are Not Enforceable |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 29 2022 |
California Court of Appeal Limits the Permissibility of Time Rounding |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 12 2022 |
The City of Los Angeles’ Fair Work Week Ordinance Requires Predictable Scheduling |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 22 2022 |
Yahoo Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pitts.: Revisiting the Rules of Policy Interpretation |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 28 2014 |
Proposed California Legislation Would Limit and Possibly Punish Non-Disparagement Clauses in Online Consumer Contracts |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 3 2020 |
California State Court Declines to Expand Standing for Claims Under 1933 Act |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 10 2023 |
Momentum for Streamlining and Subsidizing Office-to-Residential Conversion Projects Builds in Sacramento and San Francisco |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 17 2020 |
City of San Francisco to Provide Paid Sick Leave for Private Sector Workers Impacted by COVID-19 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 18 2020 |
Governor Newsom Issues Executive Order Easing Restrictions on Commercial Drivers During COVID-19 Outbreak |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 20 2020 |
California Statewide Stay at Home Order March 19, 2020 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 6 2023 |
Fording Viking River, Another California Court of Appeal Holds That PAGA Plaintiffs Maintain Standing to Pursue “Representative” Claims Even if Compelled to Arbitrate “Individual” Claims |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 13 2023 |
Celebrity “Faces Off” Against Deep Fake AI App Over Right of Publicity |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 8 2020 |
State-Level Rent Relief Due to COVID-19 Impacts: California Governor Newsom’s Executive Order Explained |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 10 2014 |
Allegations that Defendants Provided Product for “Free” State Claims Under California’s Unfair Practices Act (UPA) and Unfair Competition Law (UCL), Notwithstanding that “Cost” of Product Was Recouped by Overcharging for Shipping |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 28 2023 |
It Is Time to Check Your Onboarding Documents – Employer’s Confidentially Agreement Renders Its Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 15 2014 |
UPDATE: San Francisco Retail Workers’ Bill of Rights |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 31 2014 |
City of Los Angeles Outsources Defense of CEQA/Land Use Lawsuits To Private Law Firms – Developers To Foot The Bill |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 17 2023 |
OSHA’s New National Emphasis Program Aimed at Preventing Warehouse Injury and Heat Hazards and Its Possible Implications on California |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 30 2023 |
Are Third-Party Diminished Value Damages Claims Covered in California? |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 15 2020 |
San Francisco Enacts a Temporary Ordinance Granting Workers Laid Off Due to COVID-19 a Right to Reinstatement |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 29 2015 |
REMINDER: California Family Rights Act Amendments Go Into Effect July 1, 2015 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Sep 23 2020 |
Mother of All Presumptions 2.0: Expanding Workers Compensation Benefits to Employees That Test Positive for COVID-19 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Sep 30 2020 |
California Housing Legislation 2020 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 6 2020 |
AB 1947’S New Filing Period for DLSE Claims and Attorney’s Fees Provisions: Coronavirus Legislation in Sheep’s Clothing? |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 25 2020 |
California Property Tax Changes to Parent-Child Exclusion |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 10 2016 |
Ramirez v. Dependable Highway Express: The Reasonable Accommodation of an Employee’s Family |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 25 2024 |
The CPPA Signals Focus on Data Minimization and Consumer Requests |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 9 2020 |
Cal/OSHA’s COVID-19 Emergency Standards Create New Complications and Costs for Retail Employers |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |